北京大学学报(医学版) ›› 2017, Vol. 49 ›› Issue (1): 142-147. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1671-167X.2017.01.026

• 论著 • 上一篇    下一篇

膝关节置换术后连续收肌管阻滞与股神经阻滞的疗效比较

赵旻暐1, 王宁2, 曾琳3, 李民2, 赵中凯1, 张菡1, 田华1△   

  1. (北京大学第三医院1. 骨科,2. 麻醉科,3. 临床流行病学研究中心,北京100191)
  • 出版日期:2017-02-18 发布日期:2017-02-18
  • 通讯作者: 田华 E-mail:tianhua@bjmu.edu.cn

Comparision for clinical efficiency of continuous adductor canal block and femoral nerve block in total knee arthroplasty

ZHAO Min-wei1, WANG Ning2, ZENG Lin3, LI Min2, ZHAO Zhong-kai1, ZHANG Han1, TIAN Hua1△   

  1. (1. Department of Orthopedics, 2. Department of Anesthesiology, 3. Research center of Clinical Epidemiology, Peking University Third Hospital, Beijing 100191, China)
  • Online:2017-02-18 Published:2017-02-18
  • Contact: TIAN Hua E-mail:tianhua@bjmu.edu.cn

摘要:

目的: 比较连续收肌管阻滞(adductor canal block, ACB)与连续股神经阻滞(femoral nerve block, FNB)在全膝关节置换术后的临床效果。方法: 前瞻性观察2016年4—9月因重度退行性骨关节炎行单侧、初次膝关节置换的患者,随机分为ACB组和FNB组。记录患者术后2、6、12、24、48 h静息及运动状态下运用疼痛数字分级法(numeric pain rating scales, NPRS)进行的镇痛评分、术前及术后24、48 h股四头肌肌力、术后48 h内阿片类药物追加使用量、术后不良反应等。结果: 共纳入40例患者,每组各20例,男 ∶女=7 ∶33,年龄(63.8±10.1)岁,体重指数(body mass index,BMI)为(28.5±3.5)kg/m2。两组患者在美国麻醉学会(American Society of Anesthesiologists, ASA)评分、术前畸形程度、疼痛评分、股四头肌肌力、手术时间和止血带使用时间方面差异无统计学意义。除术后2 h的静息痛[ACB=0.0(0,6),FNB=3.0(0,5),P=0.004]和术后12 h的运动痛[ACB=3.0(3,0), FNB=5.5(0,10),P=0.004)外,其他时点两组疼痛评分差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05)。术后24、48 h股四头肌肌力,ACB组为(85.3±27.6) N和(82.0±30.1) N,FNB组为(69.0±29.4) N和(64.4±32.0) N,两组均随时间变化呈下降趋势,尽管具体数值ACB组高于FNB组,但组间差异无统计学意义(F=2.703,P=0.108)。术后24 h内追加使用盐酸哌替啶(100 mg/次)者,ACB组有4例,FNB组有5例;术后24~48 h内追加者,ACB组3例,FNB组2例;所有追加均为1次。ACB组中,5例患者出现术后恶心,另有1例感到口干;FNB组恶心者4例,均同时伴有呕吐,另有口干者3例,下肢肌间血栓患者2例。结论: 膝关节置换术后,连续ACB的镇痛效果并不优于连续FNB,但ACB减小了对术后股四头肌力的影响,有利于术后早期活动。

关键词: 收肌管阻滞, 膝关节置换, 治疗结果, 镇痛, 股四头肌肌力

Abstract:

Objective: To compare the pain control efficiency of continuous adductor canal block (ACB) and femoral nerve block (FNB) in total knee arthroplasty. Methods: From April to September 2016, patients with severe knee osteoarthritis undergoing primary unilateral total knee arthroplasty (TKA) were prospectively observed, and all the patients were randomized received ultrasound-guided continuous ACB or FNB after surgery. Numeric pain rating scales(NPRS)pain scores in rest and activity 2, 6, 12, 24 and 48 h after surgery were collected, and the preoperative and postoperative quadriceps strength at 24 and 48 h were analyzed. Opioids consumption and anesthesia related adverse effects were also recorded. Results: In the study, 40 patients were enrolled, with 20 patients in each group, male ∶female=7 ∶33, the age: (63.8±10.1) years , and the body mass index (BMI): (28.5±3.5) kg/m2.The general conditions were comparable between the two groups. Though the rest pain 2 h after surgery [ACB=0.0(0,6), FNB=3.0(0,5), P=0.004] and activity pain 12 h post operation [ACB=3.0(3,0), FNB=5.5(0,10), P=0.004] were lower in ACB group compared with FNB group, there was no statistical difference in the other pain checking points between the two groups. The quadriceps strength 24 h and 48 h after surgery were(85.3±27.6) N and (80.0±30.1) N in ACB group, (69.0±29.4) N and (64.4±32.0) N in FNB group, both of them were declined by time. The exact data were higher in ACB group, however, there was no statistical difference between the two group by repeated measurements variance analysis(F=2.703, P=0.108).Four patients in ACB group and five in FNB acquired additional use of dolantin once (100 mg/per time) within 24 h. And among them, three patients acquired once dolantin in ACB, two in FNB, from 24 to 48 h postoperation. There were five patients who suffered nausea postoperation in ACB group, and one who reported xerostomia. Four patients in FNB had nausea with vomiting, and three experienced xerostomia. Deep vein thrombosis appeared in 2 patients in FNB group, but no one in ACB group. Conclusion: Continuous ACB is not superior in pain control after TKA compared with FNB, and the quadriceps strength could be reserved more by this method, which performed early benefits in fast rehabilitation.

Key words: Adductor canal block, Total knee arthroplasty, Treatment outcome, Analgesia, Quadriceps strength

中图分类号: 

  • R781.3
[1] 王江静,魏顺依,敖英芳,杨渝平. 前交叉韧带重建术后三种不同药物镇痛早期疗效的对比[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2024, 56(2): 293-298.
[2] 李文菁,张保宙,李恒,赖良鹏,杜辉,孙宁,龚晓峰,李莹,王岩,武勇. 胫距跟融合治疗终末期踝和后足病变的中短期临床结果[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2024, 56(2): 299-306.
[3] 安思兰,郑群怡,王锴,高姗. 全膝关节置换术后患者早期疼痛的特点及其影响因素[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2024, 56(1): 167-173.
[4] 邹雪,白小娟,张丽卿. 艾拉莫德联合托法替布治疗难治性中重度类风湿关节炎的疗效[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2023, 55(6): 1013-1021.
[5] 薛蔚,董樑,钱宏阳,费笑晨. 前列腺癌新辅助治疗与辅助治疗的现状及进展[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2023, 55(5): 775-780.
[6] 邱敏,宗有龙,王滨帅,杨斌,徐楚潇,孙争辉,陆敏,赵磊,卢剑,刘承,田晓军,马潞林. 腹腔镜肾部分切除术治疗中高复杂程度肾肿瘤的效果[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2023, 55(5): 833-837.
[7] 王磊,韩天栋,江卫星,李钧,张道新,田野. 主动迁移技术与原位碎石技术在输尿管软镜治疗1~2 cm输尿管上段结石中的安全性和有效性比较[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2023, 55(3): 553-557.
[8] 李伟浩,李伟,张学民,李清乐,焦洋,张韬,蒋京军,张小明. 去分支杂交手术和传统手术治疗胸腹主动脉瘤的结果比较[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2022, 54(1): 177-181.
[9] 朱正达,高岩,何汶秀,方鑫,刘洋,魏攀,闫志敏,华红. 红色诺卡氏菌细胞壁骨架治疗糜烂型口腔扁平苔藓的疗效及安全性[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2021, 53(5): 964-969.
[10] 王鑫光,耿霄,李杨,吴天晨,李子剑,田华. 便携式导航与计算机导航辅助在全膝关节置换力线对准和手术时间的比较[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2021, 53(4): 728-733.
[11] 李潇,苏家增,张严妍,张丽琪,张亚琼,柳登高,俞光岩. 131I相关唾液腺炎的炎症分级及内镜治疗[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2020, 52(3): 586-590.
[12] 王菲,赵阳阳,关明,王晶,许向亮,刘宇,翟新利. 静脉给药镇静技术在2 582例口腔外科门诊手术中的临床应用[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2020, 52(1): 181-186.
[13] 詹颖,杜祎甜,仰浈臻,张春丽,齐宪荣. 紫杉醇微球-原位凝胶的制备及其局部注射的抗肿瘤药效[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2019, 51(3): 477-486.
[14] 邓莹,李岩,姚瑶,冯丹丹,徐懋. 颈5-6神经根阻滞技术用于肩关节镜术后镇痛的随机对照研究[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2019, 51(1): 177-181.
[15] 杨泽川,刘朝旭,林阳,胡伟华,陈文坚,李锋,曾恒. 颈后路单开门椎管扩大成形术全钛板与交替钛板、缝线固定治疗颈椎病的对比研究[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2019, 51(1): 187-193.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!