北京大学学报(医学版) ›› 2018, Vol. 50 ›› Issue (3): 395-400. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1671-167X.2018.03.002

• 论著 • 上一篇    下一篇

纳米二氧化钛与脂多糖对小鼠肝脏抗氧化性能的影响

段淑敏,张永亮,王云△   

  1. (北京大学公共卫生学院劳动卫生与环境卫生学系, 北京100191)
  • 出版日期:2018-06-18 发布日期:2018-06-18
  • 通讯作者: 王云 E-mail:wangyun@bjmu.edu.cn
  • 基金资助:
    北京市自然科学基金(7172116)、国家自然科学基金(31400863)资助

Effects of titanium dioxide nanoparticles and lipopolysaccharide on antioxidant function of liver tissues in mice

DUAN Shu-min, ZHANG Yong-liang, WANG Yun△   

  1. (Department of Occupational and Environmental Health Sciences, Peking University of School of Public Health, Beijing 100191, China)
  • Online:2018-06-18 Published:2018-06-18
  • Contact: WANG Yun E-mail:wangyun@bjmu.edu.cn
  • Supported by:
    Supported by the Beijing Natural Science Foundation (7172116) and the National Natural Science Foundation of China (31400863)

摘要: 目的:比较慢性经口暴露不同尺寸二氧化钛(titanium dioxide, TiO2)对小鼠肝脏组织抗氧化性能的影响,并探讨纳米TiO2在小鼠肝脏中对脂多糖(lipopolysaccharide, LPS)易感性的影响。方法:将90只4 周龄清洁级雄性ICR小鼠分为18组,分别饲喂维持饲料、1%(质量分数)纳米TiO2(34 nm)饲料、1%(质量分数)亚微米TiO2(125 nm)饲料1个月、3个月、6个月,饲养结束后的第2天再分别灌胃给予0或10 mg/kg LPS,4 h后处死小鼠,记录体重及肝重,并计算肝脏系数,取肝组织制备匀浆测定抗氧化指标,包括总抗氧化能力(total antioxidant capacity,T-AOC)、总超氧化物歧化酶(total superoxide dismutase,T-SOD)、谷胱甘肽过氧化物酶(glutathione peroxidase,GSHPX)、丙二醛(malondialdehyde,MDA)。结果:小鼠的体重改变仅在染毒1个月的情况下出现,表现为各处理组的体重与对照组相比显著下降,肝脏系数在各组均未发生明显变化。染毒1个月、6个月小鼠纳米TiO2+LPS处理组、亚微米TiO2+LPS处理组与对照组、纳米TiO2处理组、亚微米TiO2处理组和LPS处理组相比,肝脏T-AOC、T-SOD、MDA三项指标有不同程度的升高。染毒3个月小鼠不同尺寸TiO2处理组的肝脏MDA活性降低。染毒1个月与6个月小鼠不同尺寸TiO2处理组下各项指标结果间差异无统计学意义,与对照组间差异也无统计学意义。结论:长期口服纳米TiO2和亚微米TiO2对成长期小鼠肝脏更容易产生损伤,且损伤既可能是还原损伤也可能是氧化损伤,小尺寸TiO2会提高小鼠肝脏对LPS的易感性,并随着暴露时间的增加而提高。

关键词: 二氧化钛, 纳米颗粒, 抗氧化剂,

Abstract: Objective: To compare the effects of different sized titanium dioxide (titanium dioxide, TiO2) on the antioxidant function of liver tissues in mice, and study the effect of TiO2 nanoparticles on the susceptibility of lipopolysaccharide (LPS) on liver tissues. Methods: Ninety 4-week-old clean-grade male ICR mice were divided into 18 groups, in which the mice were fed for different feed involving ordinary feed, nanometer TiO2 feed which meant the feed including 1% (mass fraction) TiO2 nanoparticles, and submicron TiO2 feed which meant the feed including 1% (mass fraction) TiO2 submicron particles. Respectively, they were fed for 1 month, 3 months and 6 months. On the second day after the feeding, respectively, 0 and 10 mg/kg LPS were given by gavage. The mice were harvested after 4 h and the body weight and liver weight for calculating the liver coefficient were recorded. Then the liver tissue homogenates were prepared for determining the antioxidant indexes including the total antioxidant capacity (T-AOC), total superoxide dismutase (T-SOD), glutathione peroxidase (GSH-PX), and malondialdehyde (MDA). Results: The change of body weight in mice was only discovered in group fed for 1 month, which showed significant decrease of body weight in treatment groups compared with control group. And there was no significant change of the liver coefficient in each group. Compared with control groups, nanometer TiO2 groups and submicron TiO2 group, the activity of T-AOC, T-SOD and MDA of nanometer TiO2+LPS group and submicron TiO2+LPS group in which the mice were fed for 1 month and 6 months increased in different degree. And another result was also existing. The MDA activity of liver in different sized treatment groups fed for 3 months decreased. Neither significant difference between the results of different sized TiO2 treatment groups, nor significant difference among different sized TiO2 groups and the control groups were observed. Conclusion: Long-term peroral TiO2 nanoparticles and TiO2 submicron particles are more likely to cause damage to the liver in the growing mice, and the damage may be either reductive or oxidative. In addition, small sized TiO2 can increase the susceptibility of mice liver to LPS and the susceptibility will increase with the increase of exposure time.

Key words: Titanium dioxide, Nanoparticles, Antioxidants, Liver

中图分类号: 

  •  
[1] 王楠楠, 袁大晋, 朱昱冰, 丁磊. 结直肠癌根治术后肝转移风险多中心列线图预测模型的构建与验证[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2026, 58(2): 290-300.
[2] 李嘉临, 陈力侨, 唐家天, 吴艳, 王安强. 胃肝样腺癌转化治疗1例[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2026, 58(2): 399-404.
[3] 宋畅, 冯琦琛, 杨广鑫, 刘启佳, 王昌明, 李选. 液-固兼用曲张静脉栓塞技术联合专用支架在经颈内静脉肝内门体分流术中的应用[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2025, 57(5): 1010-1013.
[4] 唐少海, 杨宝明, 李建坤, 赵丽丽, 王仪凡, 王顺祥. HDAC2介导H3K27ac修饰促进肝癌细胞的增殖和迁移[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2025, 57(5): 884-894.
[5] 高亚东, 朱安, 李璐迪, 李盈姿, 王旗. 左金丸中吴茱萸生物碱和小檗碱联合用药对HepG2细胞毒性的影响[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2025, 57(5): 926-933.
[6] 秦秋实, 李蕊, 周妍希, 张玥, 韩铭, 朱鏐娈. 敲减Blimp1基因表达对CCl4诱导的小鼠肝纤维化模型早期肝损伤的保护作用[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2025, 57(4): 727-734.
[7] 杨树涵, 李奕昕, 崔浩亮, 王佑新, 吴玉莹, 王明月, 杨依凡, 恩卡尔·努尔, 杨磊, 王辉. 代谢相关脂肪性肝病及其心脏代谢风险指标异常与不良妊娠结局的相关性[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2025, 57(3): 487-495.
[8] 王燕磊, 段敏, 肖建中, 赵文惠. 垂体瘤合并肝硬化患者生长激素反常升高1例[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2025, 57(2): 400-402.
[9] 罗丹, 黄海建, 陈新, 陈小岩. 原发子宫肝样腺癌2例临床病理分析及文献复习[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2024, 56(6): 1126-1131.
[10] 王磊,金香淑,董慧君,欧国敏,赖鑫源,庄辉,李彤,向宽辉. 基于COL1A1启动子和增强型绿色荧光蛋白基因建立人肝星状细胞活化的细胞模型[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2023, 55(5): 876-885.
[11] 田慈,白颐,马青变,葛洪霞. 7例肝门静脉积气的临床特征分析[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2023, 55(4): 743-747.
[12] 史佳琪,马莺,张奕,陈章健,贾光. 纳米二氧化钛颗粒对人肝癌细胞HepG2中circRNA表达谱的影响[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2023, 55(3): 392-399.
[13] 梁秀睿,闪雪纯,关晶,张锐,杨静,张怡,金佳琦,张誉馨,徐凡,傅继华. 高血糖诱导肝星状细胞5-羟色胺降解在2型糖尿病致肝脏炎症和纤维化时的作用[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2022, 54(6): 1141-1150.
[14] 王雷婕,李明蔚,刘燕娜,陈香梅,赵景民,刘树红,鲁凤民. 慢性乙型肝炎病毒感染的自然病程特征[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2022, 54(5): 920-926.
[15] 张家赫, 史佳琪, 陈章健, 贾光. 基于人消化道微生态体外模拟系统观察纳米二氧化钛对肠道菌群的影响[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2022, 54(3): 468-476.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!