应用于无牙颌种植修复设计的三维面部扫描配准方法的对比

doi:10.19723/j.issn.1671-167X.2021.01.013

北京大学学报（医学版） ›› 2021, Vol. 53 ›› Issue (1): 83-87. doi: 10.19723/j.issn.1671-167X.2021.01.013

应用于无牙颌种植修复设计的三维面部扫描配准方法的对比

国丹妮¹,潘韶霞^1,^Δ(),衡墨笛²,屈健²,魏秀霞²,周永胜¹

1.北京大学口腔医学院·口腔医院, 修复科, 国家口腔疾病临床医学研究中心口腔数字化医疗技术和材料国家工程实验室口腔数字医学北京市重点实验室,北京 100081
2.北京大学口腔医学院·口腔医院,义齿加工中心国家口腔疾病临床医学研究中心口腔数字化医疗技术和材料国家工程实验室口腔数字医学北京市重点实验室,北京 100081

收稿日期:2020-10-12 出版日期:2021-02-18 发布日期:2021-02-07
通讯作者: 潘韶霞 E-mail:panshaoxia@vip.163.com
基金资助:
国家重点研发计划项目(2020YFC2009000);国家重点研发计划项目(2020YFC2009005);北京大学口腔医学院临床新技术新疗法项目(PKUSSNCT-20G03)

Comparison of the registration methods for the three-dimensional facial scans applied to the design of full-arch implant supported restoration

GUO Dan-ni¹,PAN Shao-xia^1,^Δ(),HENG Mo-di²,QU Jian²,WEI Xiu-xia²,ZHOU Yong-sheng¹

1. Department of Prosthodontics, Peking University School and Hospital of Stomatology & National Clinical Research Center for Oral Diseases & National Engineering Laboratory for Digital and Material Technology of Stomatology & Beijing Key Laboratory of Digital Stomatology, Beijing 100081, China
2. Dental Laboratory, Peking University School and Hospital of Stomatology & National Clinical Research Center for Oral Diseases & National Engineering Laboratory for Digital and Material Technology of Stomatology & Beijing Key Laboratory of Digital Stomatology, Beijing 100081, China

Received:2020-10-12 Online:2021-02-18 Published:2021-02-07
Contact: Shao-xia PAN E-mail:panshaoxia@vip.163.com
Supported by:
National Key Research and Development Program of China(2020YFC2009000);National Key Research and Development Program of China(2020YFC2009005);Program for New Clinical Techniques Therapies of Peking University and School and Hospital of Stomatology(PKUSSNCT-20G03)

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

目的: 比较无牙颌种植修复设计三维面部扫描配准的5种方法的配准精度,探究适宜的配准方法。方法: 依据标准共纳入10名受试者,每位受试者戴有具有特征标志点的蜡堤。利用FaceScan三维面部扫描仪获取10位拟行无牙颌种植修复患者的自然大笑位和开口器牵拉暴露口内蜡堤的三维面部扫描数据,将扫描数据导入数字化分析软件Geomagic Qualify 2012中,建立局部坐标系,分别利用面部解剖标志点对齐、面部不动区域对齐、面部点对齐与区域对齐结合、增加面部特征点对齐、增加面部和口内特征标记对齐5种方法将两个面部扫描数据重合,计算同一选定区域的三维偏差,三维偏差越小代表配准精度越高。采用SPSS22.0软件进行统计学分析,面部解剖标志点对齐、面部不动区域对齐、面部点对齐与区域对齐结合3组间差异进行Frideman检验,是否增加面部特征点对齐和是否增加口内特征标记对齐的两组进行配对t检验比较。结果: 直接选择面部解剖标志点对齐[(1.501 2±0.406 1) mm],面上1/3选中区域三维偏差平均值显著大于面部不动区域对齐[(0.629 1±0.150 6) mm]及两种方法相结合[(0.603 5±0.493 4) mm]的偏差(P<0.001);增加面部特征点可显著减小配准后偏差(t=1.001 3, P<0.001),其余组间差异无统计学意义。结论: 面上1/3不动区域应用于无牙颌种植修复设计的三维面部扫描配准是临床可行的,面部扫描操作时可尽量暴露前额区域,增加面部特征点,并利用面部不动区域最佳拟合对齐提高配准精度。

关键词: 成像, 三维, 种植, 面部标志点, 配准, 配准精度

Abstract:

Objective: To compare the registration accuracy of three-dimensional (3D) facial scans for the design of full-arch implant supported restoration by five methods and to explore the suitable registration method.Methods: According to the criteria, ten patients with maxillary edentulous jaw or end-stage dentition requiring implant supported restorations were enrolled in this study. A special rim with individual feature marks reflected appropriate occlusal relationship and esthetic characteristics was made for each patient. Both 3D facial scan data of natural laughter and with opener traction to expose the teeth or occlusal rim of each patient were acquired by facial scan and input to the digital analysis software Geomagic Qualify 2012. The dataset was superimposed by five different methods: seven facial anatomical landmark points alignment, facial immobile area alignment (forehead and nasal area), facial anatomical landmark points and immobile area combining alignment, facial feature points alignment, facial and intraoral feature points alignment with the same local coordinate system. The three-dimensional deviation of the same selected area was calculated, the smaller the deviation, the higher the registration accuracy. The 3D deviation was compared among the three registration methods of facial anatomical landmark points, facial immobile area alignment and the combination of the above two methods. Friedman test was performed to analyze the difference among the three methods (α=0.05). The effect of the aid of the facial and intraoral feature points were evaluated. Paired t test were performed to analyze the difference (P<0.05).Results: The average three-dimensional deviation of the selected area after alignment with the facial anatomical landmarks was (1.501 2±0.406 1) mm, significantly larger than that of the facial immobile area best-fit alignment [(0.629 1±0.150 6) mm] and the combination of the two methods[(0.629 1±0.150 6) mm] (P<0.001). The aid of the facial feature points could significantly reduce the deviation (t=1.001 3, P<0.001). There was no significant statistical difference in the remaining groups.Conclusion: The forehead area of the 3D facial scan can be exposed as much as possible. The establishment of facial characteristic landmark points and the use of the invariant area alignment can improve the accuracy of registration. It should be clinically feasible to apply three-dimensional facial scan to the design of full-arch implant supported restoration with the registration of the immobile area on the face especially the forehead area.

Key words: Imaging, Three-dimensional, Implant, Facial landmarks, Registration, Registration accuracy

中图分类号:

R783.4

国丹妮,潘韶霞,衡墨笛,屈健,魏秀霞,周永胜. 应用于无牙颌种植修复设计的三维面部扫描配准方法的对比[J]. 北京大学学报（医学版）, 2021, 53(1): 83-87.

GUO Dan-ni,PAN Shao-xia,HENG Mo-di,QU Jian,WEI Xiu-xia,ZHOU Yong-sheng. Comparison of the registration methods for the three-dimensional facial scans applied to the design of full-arch implant supported restoration[J]. Journal of Peking University (Health Sciences), 2021, 53(1): 83-87.

图/表 3

图1

图2

图4

参考文献 25

[1]	Wong JY, Oh AK, Ohta E, et al. Validity and reliability of craniofacial anthropometric measurement of 3D digital photogrammetric images[J]. Cleft Palate Craniofac J, 2008,45(3):232-239. doi: 10.1597/06-175 pmid: 18452351
[2]	Knoops PG, Beaumont CA, Borghi A, et al. Comparison of three-dimensional scanner systems for craniomaxillofacial imaging[J]. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg, 2017,70(4):441-449. doi: 10.1016/j.bjps.2016.12.015 pmid: 28161205
[3]	Artopoulos A, Buytaert JA, Dirckx JJ, et al. Comparison of the accuracy of digital stereophotogrammetry and projection moiré profilometry for three-dimensional imaging of the face[J]. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg, 2014,43(5):654-662. doi: 10.1016/j.ijom.2013.10.005 pmid: 24225265
[4]	Secher JJ, Darvann TA, Pinholt EM. Accuracy and reproducibility of the DAVID SLS-2 scanner in three-dimensional facial imaging[J]. J Craniomaxillofac Surg, 2017,45(10):1662-1670. doi: 10.1016/j.jcms.2017.07.006 pmid: 28847623
[5]	Sforza C, de Menezes M, Ferrario V. Soft- and hard-tissue facial anthropometry in three dimensions: what’s new[J]. J Anthropol Sci, 2013,91:159-184. doi: 10.4436/JASS.91007
[6]	Zhao YJ, Xiong YX, Wang Y. Three-dimensional accuracy of facial scan for facial deformities in clinics: a new evaluation method for facial scanner accuracy[J]. PLoS One, 2017,12(1):e0169402. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0169402 pmid: 28056044
[7]	Jang KS, Bayome M, Park JH, et al. A three-dimensional photogrammetric analysis of the facial esthetics of the miss Korea pageant contestants[J]. Korean J Orthod, 2017,47(2):87-99. doi: 10.4041/kjod.2017.47.2.87 pmid: 28337418
[8]	刘云松, 叶红强, 谷明, 等. 患者参与的数字化设计在前牙美学修复中的应用[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2014,46(1):90-94.
[9]	Hassan B, Gimenez Gonzalez B, Tahmaseb A, et al. A digital approach integrating facial scanning in a CAD-CAM workflow for complete-mouth implant-supported rehabilitation of patients with edentulism: A pilot clinical study[J]. J Prosthet Dent, 2017,117(4):486-492. doi: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2016.07.033 pmid: 27881321
[10]	Coachman C, Calamita MA, Coachman FG, et al. Facially generated and cephalometric guided 3D digital design for complete mouth implant rehabilitation: a clinical report[J]. J Prosthet Dent, 2017,117(5):577-586. doi: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2016.09.005 pmid: 27836143
[11]	Hassan B, Greven M, Wismeijer D. Integrating 3D facial scanning in a digital workflow to CAD/CAM design and fabricate complete dentures for immediate total mouth rehabilitation[J]. J Adv Prosthodont, 2017,9(5):381-386. doi: 10.4047/jap.2017.9.5.381 pmid: 29142646
[12]	Ritschl LM, Wolff KD, Erben P, et al. Simultaneous, radiation-free registration of the dentoalveolar position and the face by combining 3D photography with a portable scanner and impression-taking[J]. Head Face Med, 2019,15(1):28. doi: 10.1186/s13005-019-0212-x pmid: 31767030
[13]	Bohner L, Gamba DD, Hanisch M, et al. Accuracy of digital technologies for the scanning of facial, skeletal, and intraoral tissues: a systematic review[J]. J Prosthet Dent, 2019,121(2):246-251. doi: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2018.01.015 pmid: 30017156
[14]	赵一姣, 熊玉雪, 杨慧芳, 等. 2种三维颜面部扫描仪测量精度的定量评价[J]. 实用口腔医学杂志, 2016,32(1):37-42.
[15]	苏莉, 王红梅, 白玉兴. 基于激光扫描的面部软组织三维模型的重叠和分析方法的建立[J]. 北京口腔医学, 2015,23(3):135-140.
[16]	熊玉雪, 杨慧芳, 赵一姣, 等. 两种评价面部三维表面数据不对称度方法的比较[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2015,47(2):340-343. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1671-167X.2015.02.030
[17]	Pérez-Giugovaz MG, Park SH, Revilla-León M. Three-dimen-sional virtual representation by superimposing facial and intraoral digital scans with an additively manufactured intraoral scan body [J/OL]. J Prosthet Dent, 2020[2020-09-25]. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2020.07.012.
[18]	Lepidi L, Galli M, Grammatica A, et al. Indirect digital workflow for virtual cross-mounting of fixed implant-supported prostheses to create a 3d virtual patient [J/OL]. J Prosthodont, 2020 [2020-8-31]. https://doi.org/10.1111/jopr.13247.
[19]	彭菊香, 江久汇, 赵一姣, 等. 结构光扫描对骨性Ⅲ类错牙合正畸正颌联合治疗前后软组织三维变化的初步评价[J], 北京大学学报(医学版), 2015,47(1):98-103.
[20]	Germec-Cakan D, Canter HI, Nur B, et al. Comparison of facial soft tissue measurements on three-dimensional images and models obtained with different methods[J]. J Craniofac Surg, 2010,21(5):1393-1399. doi: 10.1097/SCS.0b013e3181ec6976 pmid: 20856027
[21]	Hajeer MY, Ayoub AF, Millett DT, et al. Three-dimensional imaging in orthognathic surgery: the clinical application of a new method[J]. Int J Adult Orthodon Orthognath Surg, 2002,17(4):318-330. pmid: 12593004
[22]	苏莉, 曹丽, 龚宇田. 基于激光扫描的面部软组织三维模型三种重叠方法的对比[J], 北京口腔医学, 2018,26(1):33-36.
[23]	Revilla-León M, Campbell HE, Meyer MJ, et al. Esthetic dental perception comparisons between 2D- and 3D-simulated dental discrepancies[J]. J Prosthet Dent, 2020[2020-01-22]. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2019.11.015. doi: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2020.09.060 pmid: 33455728
[24]	Ghoddousi H, Edler R, Haers P, et al. Comparison of three methods of facial measurement[J]. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg, 2007,36(3):250-258. doi: 10.1016/j.ijom.2006.10.001 pmid: 17113754
[25]	Knoops PG, Beaumont CA, Borghi A, et al. Comparison of three-dimensional scanner systems for craniomaxillofacial imaging[J]. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg, 2017,70(4):441-449. doi: 10.1016/j.bjps.2016.12.015 pmid: 28161205

Metrics

Viewed

Full text

Abstract

Cited

Shared

Discussed

应用于无牙颌种植修复设计的三维面部扫描配准方法的对比

Comparison of the registration methods for the three-dimensional facial scans applied to the design of full-arch implant supported restoration

RICH HTML

PDF (PC)

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

图/表 3

参考文献 25

相关文章 15

Metrics

本文评价

推荐阅读 10

[1]	孙菲,李思琪,危伊萍,钟金晟,王翠,胡文杰. 种植体周病非手术治疗中联合应用甘氨酸粉喷砂的临床效果评价[J]. 北京大学学报（医学版）, 2022, 54(1): 119-125.
[2]	李熠,尉华杰,邱立新. 种植体折裂的临床分型与临床治疗方案[J]. 北京大学学报（医学版）, 2022, 54(1): 126-133.
[3]	刘思民,赵一姣,王晓燕,王祖华. 动态导航下不同深度环钻定位精确度的体外评价[J]. 北京大学学报（医学版）, 2022, 54(1): 146-152.
[4]	邱淑婷,朱玉佳,王时敏,王飞龙,叶红强,赵一姣,刘云松,王勇,周永胜. 姿势微笑位口唇对称参考平面的数字化构建及初步应用验证[J]. 北京大学学报（医学版）, 2022, 54(1): 193-199.
[5]	王鹃,尉华杰,孙井德,邱立新. 预成刚性连接杆用于无牙颌种植即刻印模制取的应用评价[J]. 北京大学学报（医学版）, 2022, 54(1): 187-192.
[6]	任国勇,吴雪梅,李颖,李婕妤,孙伟平,黄一宁. 大血管闭塞性脑卒中亚急性期磁敏感血管征的表现[J]. 北京大学学报（医学版）, 2021, 53(6): 1133-1138.
[7]	李媛,林红,张铁军. 对比传统成像与数字成像对牙科复合树脂X射线阻射性的影响[J]. 北京大学学报（医学版）, 2021, 53(5): 995-1001.
[8]	杨刚,胡文杰,曹洁,柳登高. 牙周健康的上颌前牙唇侧嵴顶上牙龈的三维形态分析[J]. 北京大学学报（医学版）, 2021, 53(5): 990-994.
[9]	梁峰,吴敏节,邹立东. 后牙区单牙种植修复5年后的临床修复疗效观察[J]. 北京大学学报（医学版）, 2021, 53(5): 970-976.
[10]	邵振兴,宋庆法,赵宇晴,崔国庆. 一种结合线袢固定的关节镜下“嵌入式”喙突移位术:手术技术及术后影像学分析[J]. 北京大学学报（医学版）, 2021, 53(5): 896-901.
[11]	吴一凡,张晓圆,任爽,玉应香,常翠青. 基于磁共振的青年男性股四头肌的测量和评估[J]. 北京大学学报（医学版）, 2021, 53(5): 843-849.
[12]	李新飞, 彭意吉, 余霄腾, 熊盛炜, 程嗣达, 丁光璞, 杨昆霖, 唐琦, 米悦, 吴静云, 张鹏, 谢家馨, 郝瀚, 王鹤, 邱建星, 杨建, 李学松, 周利群. 肾部分切除术前CT三维可视化评估标准的初步探究[J]. 北京大学学报（医学版）, 2021, 53(3): 613-622.
[13]	胡迪,张苗,康惠颖,彭芸. 0~2岁婴幼儿磁共振脑白质模板的建立及验证[J]. 北京大学学报（医学版）, 2021, 53(2): 341-347.
[14]	陈迪,徐翔宇,汪明睿,李芮,臧根奥,张悦,钱浩楠,闫光荣,范田园. 熔融沉积成型3D打印盐酸维拉帕米胃漂浮制剂的制备与体外评价[J]. 北京大学学报（医学版）, 2021, 53(2): 348-354.
[15]	刘晓强,杨洋,周建锋,刘建彰,谭建国. 640例单牙种植术对血压和心率影响的队列研究[J]. 北京大学学报（医学版）, 2021, 53(2): 390-395.