恶性肿瘤患儿完全植入式静脉输液港手术并发症

doi:10.19723/j.issn.1671-167X.2022.06.018

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

目的: 总结完全植入式静脉输液港(totally implantable venous access port，TIVAP)在恶性肿瘤患儿中应用的手术经验，探讨其手术并发症的应对方法。方法: 回顾性分析北京大学第一医院小儿外科2017年1月至2019年12月期间165例接受TIVAP植入术的恶性肿瘤患儿病例资料，记录并统计TIVAP植入的手术过程、并发症及并发症处理情况。结果: 本组患儿按手术方式不同分为颈外静脉切开组(n=27)和颈内静脉穿刺组(n=138)，后者又分为超声引导穿刺组(n=95)和盲穿刺组(n=43)。颈外静脉切开组无穿刺并发症发生，其平均置管成功所用时间和导管进入上腔静脉所用顺管次数均多于颈内静脉穿刺组[(9.26±1.85) min vs. (5.76±1.56) min，(1.93±0.87)次vs. 1次]，差异有统计学意义。超声引导颈内静脉穿刺组平均置管成功所用时间、一次穿刺成功率、平均穿刺次数和穿刺并发症发生率均优于盲穿刺组[(5.36±1.12) min vs. (6.67±1.99) min，93.68%(89/95) vs. 74.42%(32/43)，(1.06±0.24)次vs. (1.29±0.55)次，2.11%(2/95) vs. 11.63%(5/43)]，差异有统计学意义。本组总并发症发生率12.12%(20/165)，其中气胸1例，误穿动脉1例，局部血肿5例，输液港相关性感染4例(输液港局部感染2例、导管相关性血流感染2例)，港座表面皮下组织变菲薄2例，港座翻转1例，输液不畅4例(导管弯折1例、导管堵塞3例)，皮下管路周围排异物聚集2例，未发生导管断裂、脱落和导管夹闭综合征等并发症。结论: TIVAP能为恶性肿瘤患儿提供安全有效的输液通道，颈外静脉切开和超声引导颈内静脉穿刺是小儿TIVAP植入的可靠术式。手术医师应对TIVAP并发症有充分的认识，采取措施减少并发症的发生，正确处置已发生的并发症。

关键词: 完全植入式静脉输液港, 导管插入术, 手术后并发症, 儿童

Abstract:

Objective: To summarize the surgical experience of totally implantable venous access port in children with malignant tumors, and to explore the coping methods of surgical complications. Methods: The clinical data of 165 children with malignant tumors implanted in totally implantable venous access port in Department of Pediatric Surgery, Peking University First Hospital from January 2017 to December 2019 were retrospectively analyzed. The operation process, complications and treatment of complications were observed and counted. Results: The children in this group were divided into external ju-gular vein incision group (n=27) and internal jugular vein puncture group (n=138) according to different surgical methods, and the latter was divided into ultrasound guided puncture group (n=95) and blind puncture group (n=43). No puncture complications occurred in the external jugular vein incision group, and the average time for successful catheterization and the number of times for catheter to enter the superior vena cava were more than those in the internal jugular vein puncture group [(9.26±1.85) min vs. (5.76±1.56) min, (1.93±0.87) times vs. 1 time], with statistical significance. The average time of successful catheterization, the success rate of one puncture, the average number of punctures and the incidence of puncture complications in the ultrasound guided right internal jugular vein puncture group were better than those in the blind puncture group [(5.36±1.12) min vs. (6.67±1.99) min, 93.68% (89/95) vs. 74.42% (32/43), (1.06±0.24) times vs. (1.29±0.55) times, 2.11% (2/95) vs. 11.63% (5/43)], with statistically significant differences. The total incidence of complications in this study was 12.12% (20/165). Pneumothorax occurred in 1 case, artery puncture by mistake in 1 case, local hematoma in 5 cases, venous access port related infection in 4 cases (venous access port local infection in 2 cases, catheter related blood flow infection in 2 cases), subcutaneous tissue thinning on the surface of port seat in 2 cases, port seat overturning in 1 case, poor transfusion in 4 cases (catheter discount in 1 case, catheter blockage in 3 cases), and foreign bodies gathered around the subcutaneous pipeline in 2 cases. There were no complications, such as catheter rupture, detachment and catheter clamping syndrome. Conclusion: Totally implantable venous access port can provide safe and effective infusion channels for children with malignant tumors. Right external jugular vein incision and ultrasound-guided right internal jugular vein puncture are reliable surgical methods for children's totally implantable venous access port implantation. Surgeons should fully understand the complications of the venous access port, take measures to reduce the occurrence of complications, and properly handle the complications that have occurred.

Key words: Totally implantable venous access port, Catheterization, Postoperative complications, Child

中图分类号:

R726

李辉,高阳旭,王书磊,姚红新. 恶性肿瘤患儿完全植入式静脉输液港手术并发症[J]. 北京大学学报（医学版）, 2022, 54(6): 1167-1171.

Hui LI,Yang-xu GAO,Shu-lei WANG,Hong-xin YAO. Surgical complications of totally implantable venous access port in children with malignant tumors[J]. Journal of Peking University (Health Sciences), 2022, 54(6): 1167-1171.

图/表 3

表1

表2

图1

参考文献 17

1	Zhang P , Du J , Fan CS , et al. Utility of totally implantable venous access ports in patients with breast cancer[J]. Breast J, 2020, 26 (2): 333- 334. doi: 10.1111/tbj.13595
2	Xu HP , Chen R , Jiang CJ , et al. Implanting totally implantable venous access ports in the upper arm is feasible and safe for patients with early breast cancer[J]. J Vasc Access, 2020, 21 (5): 609- 614. doi: 10.1177/1129729819894461
3	余磊, 张英妹, 黄种文, 等. 经颈静脉及锁骨下静脉输液港植入术并发症的比较分析[J]. 当代医学, 2021, 27 (3): 112- 114. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1009-4393.2021.03.044
4	李颖, 姜浩, 韩哲洙, 等. 颈内静脉与锁骨下静脉植入输液港并发症发生率的对比分析[J]. 实用放射学杂志, 2020, 36 (9): 1496- 1499. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1002-1671.2020.09.035
5	Sundaram J , Agarwal P , Ramasundaram M , et al. Implantable venous access devices in pediatric malignancies: Institutional expe-rience in a developing nation[J]. J Indian Assoc Pediatr Surg, 2020, 25 (5): 286- 290. doi: 10.4103/jiaps.JIAPS_121_19
6	Zhang KC , Chen L , Chinese Research Hospital Association Digestive Tumor Committee , et al. Chinese expert consensus and practice guideline of totally implantable access port for digestive tract carcinomas[J]. World J Gastroenterol, 2020, 26 (25): 3517- 3527. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v26.i25.3517
7	中国医师协会介入医师分会. 植入式给药装置介入专家共识[J]. 中华医学杂志, 2019, 99 (7): 484- 490. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.0376-2491.2019.07.002
8	周涛, 唐甜甜, 耿翠芝, 等. 植入式静脉输液港植入手术2007例分析[J]. 中国实用外科杂志, 2014, 34 (4): 348- 350.
9	Caterina G , Maria A , Alessandro C , et al. Totally implantable venous access devices in children with medical complexity: Preliminary data from a tertiary care hospital[J]. J Vasc Access, 2017, 18 (5): 426- 429. doi: 10.5301/jva.5000727
10	Philomena CD , Shiyam K , Annupam K , et al. Complications and management of totally implantable central venous access ports in cancer patients at a university hospital in Oman[J]. Sultan Qaboos Univ Med J, 2021, 21 (1): e103- e109. doi: 10.18295/squmj.2021.21.01.014
11	黄一敏, 徐伟珏, 吴一波, 等. 小儿完全植入式静脉输液港导管相关性血流感染的诊治——附4例报道[J]. 临床小儿外科杂志, 2020, 19 (10): 939- 942.
12	Taveira MRV , Lima LS , Araújo CC , et al. Risk factors for central line-associated bloodstream infection in pediatric oncology patients with a totally implantable venous access port: A cohort study[J]. Pediatr Blood Cancer, 2017, 64 (2): 336- 342. doi: 10.1002/pbc.26225
13	Choksi A , Finnegan K , Etezadi V . Does systemic antibiotic prophylaxis prior to the placement of totally implantable venous access devices reduce early infection? A retrospective study of 1 485 cases at a large academic institution[J]. Am J Infect Control, 2020, 48 (1): 95- 99. doi: 10.1016/j.ajic.2019.06.028
14	周荻, 葛峰, 缪长虹, 等. 复旦大学附属中山医院完全植入式静脉输液港植入与维护规范(v1.2020)[J]. 中国临床医学, 2020, 27 (4): 697- 703.
15	余超, 葛坤元, 蒋晓东, 等. 3种不同途径植入静脉输液港的临床应用比较[J]. 复旦学报(医学版), 2021, 48 (2): 229- 234. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1672-8467.2021.02.013
16	Ding XY , Ding F , Wang YG , et al. Shanghai expert consensus on totally implantable access ports 2019[J]. J Intervent Med, 2019, 2 (4): 141- 145. doi: 10.1016/j.jimed.2019.10.008
17	Chou PL , Fu JY , Cheng CH , et al. Current port maintenance strategies are insufficient: View based on actual presentations of implanted ports[J]. Medicine (Baltimore), 2019, 98 (44): e17757. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000017757

相关文章 15

[1]	王晓林, 郭邵逸, 陈大召, 温锡杰, 华勇, 张亮, 张秦. 全髋关节置换术治疗系统性红斑狼疮继发股骨头缺血性坏死的随访研究[J]. 北京大学学报（医学版）, 2025, 57(6): 1081-1088.
[2]	李宗瀚, 黄洋阅, 李宁, 李明磊, 宋宏程, 张潍平, 刘超. 国产单孔蛇形臂机器人手术系统在儿童肾盂成形术中的应用[J]. 北京大学学报（医学版）, 2025, 57(4): 662-665.
[3]	左超, 王国立, 杨昆霖, 车新艳, 孟一森, 张凯. 前列腺体积不同的患者经尿道光纤铥激光前列腺剜除术的有效性及安全性比较[J]. 北京大学学报（医学版）, 2025, 57(4): 711-716.
[4]	赵兆, 张维宇, 杨文博, 张勇杰, 张晓鹏, 赵慧颖, 周刚, 王强. 低龄、低体重儿童肾移植2例[J]. 北京大学学报（医学版）, 2025, 57(4): 803-807.
[5]	张依航, 蔡珊, 陈子玥, 刘云飞, 党佳佳, 师嫡, 李佳欣, 黄天彧, 宋逸. 基于RE-AIM框架儿童青少年近视与肥胖共病综合干预实施性研究结局指标的构建[J]. 北京大学学报（医学版）, 2025, 57(3): 436-441.
[6]	唐孟利, 刘扬, 秦冉, 郭欣, 李宏田. 我国10省幼儿园5~6岁儿童近视和近视前期流行特征[J]. 北京大学学报（医学版）, 2025, 57(3): 442-447.
[7]	刘光旭, 张良, 赵厚宇, 邓思危, 杨君婷, 李宁, 马瑞, 何艳, 许国章, 刘志科, 詹思延. 2015—2021年宁波市6岁以下儿童热性惊厥的流行病学特征[J]. 北京大学学报（医学版）, 2025, 57(3): 584-591.
[8]	李琳, 廖津津. 应用ROC曲线评估久坐行为对儿童青少年视力不良的预测价值[J]. 北京大学学报（医学版）, 2025, 57(3): 614-619.
[9]	王紫薇, 李闵, 高慧, 邓芳. 链球菌感染与过敏性紫癜肾炎患儿肾损害的相关性[J]. 北京大学学报（医学版）, 2025, 57(2): 284-290.
[10]	邓敏婷, 王楠, 夏斌, 赵玉鸣, 朱俊霞. 儿童及青少年挫入恒前牙自行再萌出的相关影响因素[J]. 北京大学学报（医学版）, 2025, 57(1): 148-153.
[11]	杨颖婷, 李若竹, 窦桂丽, 雷玥, 夏斌. iRoot BP Plus用于年轻恒牙外伤部分牙髓切断治疗的临床随机对照研究[J]. 北京大学学报（医学版）, 2024, 56(6): 1083-1088.
[12]	赵双云, 邹思雨, 李雪莹, 沈丽娟, 周虹. 中文版口腔健康素养量表简版(HeLD-14)在学龄前儿童家长中应用的信度和效度评价[J]. 北京大学学报（医学版）, 2024, 56(5): 828-832.
[13]	陈心心, 唐哲, 乔艳春, 荣文笙. 北京市密云区4岁儿童患龋状况及其与龋活跃性检测的相关性[J]. 北京大学学报（医学版）, 2024, 56(5): 833-838.
[14]	万利, 张周沧, 丁嘉祥, 王梅. 中心静脉导管拔除后静脉空气栓塞1例[J]. 北京大学学报（医学版）, 2024, 56(5): 938-941.
[15]	岳芷涵,韩娜,鲍筝,吕瑾莨,周天一,计岳龙,王辉,刘珏,王海俊. 儿童早期体重指数轨迹与超重风险关联的前瞻性队列研究[J]. 北京大学学报（医学版）, 2024, 56(3): 390-396.

Metrics

Viewed

Full text

Abstract

Cited

Shared

Discussed

Related indexes of catheterization	External jugular vein incision group (n=27)	Internal jugular vein puncture group (n=138)	χ²/t	P
Successful catheterization time/min, ${\bar x}$±s	9.26±1.85	5.76±1.56	10.820	0.012
Number of catheter placement, ${\bar x}$±s	1.93±0.87	1	240.382	< 0.001
Catheterization success rate/%	100.00	99.28	0.197	0.657

Related indexes of catheterization	Blind internal jugular vein puncture group (n=43)	Ultrasound-guided internal jugular vein puncture group (n=95)	χ²/t	P
Successful catheterization time/min, ${\bar x}$±s	6.67±1.99	5.36±1.12	12.491	0.001
Catheterization success rate/%	97.67 (42/43)	100.00	2.225	0.136
One-time puncture success rate/%	74.42 (32/43)	93.68 (89/95)	10.172	0.001
Number of puncture, ${\bar x}$±s	1.29±0.55	1.06±0.24	44.398	< 0.001
Puncture complication rate/%	11.63 (5/43)	2.11 (2/95)	5.390	0.020