北京大学学报(医学版) ›› 2014, Vol. 46 ›› Issue (6): 931-935.

• 论著 • 上一篇    下一篇

体外受精-胚胎移植辅助生殖技术对学龄前期儿童体格及智力发育的影响

左娜,梁潇,王义贤,沈娟,王晓莉,王秀霞△   

  1. (中国医科大学附属盛京医院辅助生殖中心,沈阳110004)
  • 出版日期:2014-12-18 发布日期:2014-12-18

Influence of in vitro fertilization and embryo transfer on the physical and intellectual development of the children at pre-school age

左娜,梁潇,王义贤,沈娟,王晓莉,王秀霞△   

  1. (Assisted Reproduction Center, Shengjing Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang 110004, China)
  • Online:2014-12-18 Published:2014-12-18

摘要: 目的:探讨体外受精胚胎移植(in vitro fertilization and embryo transfer, IVF-ET)辅助生殖技术是否影响学龄前期儿童的体格及智力发育。方法:收集曾经IVF-ET技术助孕生产的学龄前期儿童50例(生产时足月及近足月,IVF-ET组),随机抽取出生情况、婚姻状况、家庭收入、父母文化程度等外在因素相匹配的同期自然受孕出生的儿童48例,采用回顾性队列研究比较两组儿童的体格发育及智力发育情况。结果:在语言测试中,IVF-ET组四项分测试成绩略高于自然受孕对照组,其中常识、词汇、类同词、理解分别较对照组高1.35、1.05、1.32、1.32,算术题成绩较对照组低1.21。对照组的语言总成绩较IVF-ET组高1.91分,但两组差异无统计学意义(P=0.153)。操作类题目中,IVFET组较对照组高5.5,其中迷津及几何图形分测试中,IVF-ET组分别比对照组高0.40、0.38分,而动物房、画图补缺及木块图案中,对照组比IVFET组分别高1.04、0.54、0.68分,两组操作测试总成绩差异无统计学意义(P=0.094)。总体测试成绩两组差异甚小,分别为115.8及114.6(P=0.104)。两组总成绩分等级比较差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。IVF-ET组与对照组儿童的身高在中等以上的比例分别为30%、31%,体重在中等以上的比例分别为30%、23%,IVF-ET组体重大者相对更多。两组儿童的体格生长发育差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。结论:辅助生殖技术不会造成IVF-ET儿童的体格及智力发育迟缓,家长的重视及耐心的教育更能促进儿童生长发育。

关键词: 受精, 体外, 胚胎移植, 智力, 生长和发育, 儿童, 学龄前

Abstract: Objective: To study whether the assisted reproductive technology [ in vitro fertilization and embryo transfer (IVF-ET)] has influence on the physical and intellectual development of the children at the preschool age. Methods: The study group included 50 IVF-ET children, and the control group was a match cohort of 48 children born after being naturally conceived. A matched retrospective cohort study was performed on physical and intellectual development of the two children groups. The control group was matched according to home economics situation, parents’ educational level, etc. Results:In the adjusted analysis, the differences of the physical and the intellectual development between the two groups were not statistically significant (P>0.05). In the language test, the scores of the IVF-ET group was 1.35, 1.05, 1.32, 1.32 higher than those of the control group in the subject of general knowledge, words, synonyms, understanding ability. The IVF-ET group was 1.21 lower than that of the control group in the subject of arithmetics, 1.91 lower than that of the control group in the language subject, 5.5 higher than that of the control group in the operation subject, and 0.40, 0.38 higher than those of the control group in the subject of the maze and geometry. The scores of the control group were 1.04, 0.54, and 0.68 higher than those of the IVF-ET group in the animal house, drawing of vacancy, and block pattern, respectively. The final results of the IVF-ET group and the control group was 115.8 and 114.6, respectively. The ratio of the above medium height of the IVF-ET group and the control group was 30% and 31%, respectively. The ratio of the above medium weight was 30% and 23%, respectively. The IVF-ET group was a little fatter. There was no statistical difference between the two groups in the body development. Conclusion: The assisted reproduction technology is not associated with poorer physical and intellectual development. The family pay more attention to the children may promote their development.

Key words: Fertilization in vitro, Embryo transfer, Intelligence, Growth and development, Child, preschool

[1] 李宗瀚, 黄洋阅, 李宁, 李明磊, 宋宏程, 张潍平, 刘超. 国产单孔蛇形臂机器人手术系统在儿童肾盂成形术中的应用[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2025, 57(4): 662-665.
[2] 赵兆, 张维宇, 杨文博, 张勇杰, 张晓鹏, 赵慧颖, 周刚, 王强. 低龄、低体重儿童肾移植2例[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2025, 57(4): 803-807.
[3] 张依航, 蔡珊, 陈子玥, 刘云飞, 党佳佳, 师嫡, 李佳欣, 黄天彧, 宋逸. 基于RE-AIM框架儿童青少年近视与肥胖共病综合干预实施性研究结局指标的构建[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2025, 57(3): 436-441.
[4] 唐孟利, 刘扬, 秦冉, 郭欣, 李宏田. 我国10省幼儿园5~6岁儿童近视和近视前期流行特征[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2025, 57(3): 442-447.
[5] 刘光旭, 张良, 赵厚宇, 邓思危, 杨君婷, 李宁, 马瑞, 何艳, 许国章, 刘志科, 詹思延. 2015—2021年宁波市6岁以下儿童热性惊厥的流行病学特征[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2025, 57(3): 584-591.
[6] 李琳, 廖津津. 应用ROC曲线评估久坐行为对儿童青少年视力不良的预测价值[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2025, 57(3): 614-619.
[7] 王紫薇, 李闵, 高慧, 邓芳. 链球菌感染与过敏性紫癜肾炎患儿肾损害的相关性[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2025, 57(2): 284-290.
[8] 邓敏婷, 王楠, 夏斌, 赵玉鸣, 朱俊霞. 儿童及青少年挫入恒前牙自行再萌出的相关影响因素[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2025, 57(1): 148-153.
[9] 杨颖婷, 李若竹, 窦桂丽, 雷玥, 夏斌. iRoot BP Plus用于年轻恒牙外伤部分牙髓切断治疗的临床随机对照研究[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2024, 56(6): 1083-1088.
[10] 赵双云, 邹思雨, 李雪莹, 沈丽娟, 周虹. 中文版口腔健康素养量表简版(HeLD-14)在学龄前儿童家长中应用的信度和效度评价[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2024, 56(5): 828-832.
[11] 陈心心, 唐哲, 乔艳春, 荣文笙. 北京市密云区4岁儿童患龋状况及其与龋活跃性检测的相关性[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2024, 56(5): 833-838.
[12] 岳芷涵,韩娜,鲍筝,吕瑾莨,周天一,计岳龙,王辉,刘珏,王海俊. 儿童早期体重指数轨迹与超重风险关联的前瞻性队列研究[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2024, 56(3): 390-396.
[13] 费秀文,刘斯,汪波,董爱梅. 成人及儿童组织坏死性淋巴结炎临床特征及治疗[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2024, 56(3): 533-540.
[14] 俞光岩. 儿童唾液腺疾病[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2024, 56(1): 1-3.
[15] 闫晓晋,刘云飞,马宁,党佳佳,张京舒,钟盼亮,胡佩瑾,宋逸,马军. 《中国儿童发展纲要(2011-2020年)》实施期间中小学生营养不良率变化及其政策效应分析[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2023, 55(4): 593-599.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!