北京大学学报(医学版) ›› 2016, Vol. 48 ›› Issue (1): 121-125. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1671-167X.2016.01.022

• 论著 • 上一篇    下一篇

即刻种植术后牙槽突骨板改建及美学效果评价

王莺, 林野, 陈波△, 张宇, 邸萍   

  1. (北京大学口腔医学院·口腔医院种植科,北京100081)
  • 出版日期:2016-02-18 发布日期:2016-02-18
  • 通讯作者: 陈波 E-mail:md_bochen@sina.com
  • 基金资助:

    第五期中央保健科研课题(W2013BJ42)资助

Evaluation of alveolar ridge reconstruction and esthetic result following immediate implant

WANG Ying, LIN Ye, CHEN Bo△, ZHANG Yu, DI Ping   

  1. (Department of Oral Implantology, Peking University School and Hospital of Stomotology, Beijing 100081, China)
  • Online:2016-02-18 Published:2016-02-18
  • Contact: CHEN Bo E-mail:md_bochen@sina.com
  • Supported by:

    Supported by the Fifth Central Healthcare Research Projects(W2013BJ42)

摘要:

目的:通过锥形束CT观察测量上颌切牙即刻种植的手术当日与术后6个月牙槽嵴骨板水平向和垂直向的变化量,为前牙即刻种植治疗设计提供临床参考。方法: 选取2010年8月至2011年11月于北京大学口腔医院种植科行上颌切牙即刻种植患者20例(其中男性7例,女性13例),平均年龄(28.41±10.22)岁(20~40岁),共即刻植入23颗种植体于上前牙新鲜拔牙窝内,不进行即刻修复。术后即刻及术后6个月拍摄锥形束CT, 分别测量种植体肩台下0、2、4、6、8 mm处[分别设为测量点1(measuring point 1,MP1)、MP2、MP3、MP4、MP5]牙槽嵴宽度变化及牙槽间隔中心点垂直向高度的变化。术前及永久修复后1年,通过临床检查对牙间乳头高度和唇侧丰满度进行评分。使用SPSS 20.0进行相关统计学分析。结果:所有种植体在永久修复后追踪两年,存留率100%。所有患牙位术后各个位点牙槽嵴水平向宽度均发生了一定程度的吸收改建,在种植体肩台下0、2、4、6 mm等处4个位点术前与术后比较差异均有统计学意义。各位点牙槽嵴水平向宽度分别为:MP1术前为(7.68±0.70) mm,术后为(7.00±0.76) mm;MP2术前为(7.81±0.87) mm,术后为(7.30±0.96) mm;MP3术前为(8.12±1.14) mm,术后为(7.62±1.20) mm;MP4术前为(8.48±1.57) mm,术后为(7.73±1.35) mm,P值分别为0.004,0.034,0.018,和0.016,均<0.05,术后与术前值相减为牙槽嵴宽度减少量,变化程度较大的测量点为M1和M4,分别为(-0.89±2.06) mm 和(-0.74±1.28) mm。牙槽间隔垂直向吸收量在不同系统结果不同:Ankylos系统为(-0.42±1.24) mm,Repalce系统为(-0.91±1.96) mm,经过配对t检验,差异无统计学意义。种植术前唇侧丰满度指数(labial convexity score, LCS)为3的有18个牙位,LCS为4的有2个;永久修复后1年LCS为2的有14个,LCS为3的有5个。术前牙间乳头指数(papilla index score, PSI)为2的有5个牙位,PSI为3的有15个牙位;永久修复后1年PSI为2的有7个牙位,PSI为3的有13个牙位,经过Willcoxon秩和检验,术前与永久修复后1年LCS比较差异均有统计学意义(P<0.001),PSI术前与永久修复后1年比较变化差异无统计学意义(P=0.157)。结论:即刻种植术后不能避免牙槽嵴改建而导致的牙槽骨改建吸收;即刻种植后切牙牙间乳头高度可以得到较好的维持,唇侧软组织丰满度由于牙槽骨改建而难以维持;即刻种植修复存在美学风险。

关键词: 牙种植, 美学, 牙科, 牙槽突, 锥束计算机体层摄影术

Abstract:

Objective: To evaluate the bone alteration subject to remodeling and analyze the esthetic result following immediate implant placement of incisors. Methods: In this study, 20 patients (13 women, 7 men) were involved, who needed implants for incisors of maxilla. The patients received 23 immediate implants totally. On the day of surgery and 6 months after the implants were placed, Cone beam CT (CBCT) was taken. The thickness of the alveolar ridge and the vertical change of marginal bone levels onthe mesial and distal aspects of theimplants were measured using the computer software  (PlanmecaRomexis Viewer 3.6.0.R). The evaluation of esthetic result by labial convexity score (LCS) and papilla index score (PIS) were analyzed pre-operation and one year after the final crown was delivered. The statistics with paired-t test for the measurement data and Willcoxon test for rating data were done by SPSS 20.0. Results: The survival rate in the two-year follow-up was 100%. The measuring point 1 (MP1), MP2, MP3 and MP4 (0, 2, 4, 6 mm apical to the implant platform, respectively) got significant alterations after 6 months of the follow-up. These differences were statistically significant (P<0.05).The major alteration happened at MP1 and MP4, which got (-0.89±2.06) mm and (-0.75±1.28) mm reduction of the alveolar, respectively. The marginal alveolar ridge resorption was (-0.42±1.24) mm and(-0.91±1.96) mm for Ankylos System and Replace System, respectively, and the difference was not statistical significant . The esthetic results were quite acceptable. Before treatment, 18 incisors rated 3 for LCS,and 2 incisors rated 4 for LCS;after final restoration, only 5 incisors rated 3 for LCS, and 14 incisors rated 2 for LCS. Before treatment, 15 incisors rated 3 for PIS; after final restoration, 13 incisors rated 3 for PIS. There was no statistically significant difference for the PIS pre-operation and 1 year after final restoration, while there was statistically significant negative change for LCS. Conclusion: Even following the proper surgical technique, the alveolar ridge wall still can’t be maintained after immediate implant placed in fresh socket of incisors. The inter-dental papilla could be well maintained, while due to the remodeling of labial bone, labial convexity will inevitably collapse. Therefore immediate implant still has esthetic risk.

Key words: Dental implantation, Esthetics, dental, Alveolar process, Cone-beam computed tomography

中图分类号: 

  • R783.4
[1] 吕梁,张铭津,温奧楠,赵一姣,王勇,李晶,杨庚辰,柳大为. 应用三维软组织空间线角模板法评价颏部对称性[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2024, 56(1): 106-110.
[2] 凌晓彤,屈留洋,郑丹妮,杨静,闫雪冰,柳登高,高岩. 牙源性钙化囊肿与牙源性钙化上皮瘤的三维影像特点[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2024, 56(1): 131-137.
[3] 王聪伟,高敏,于尧,章文博,彭歆. 游离腓骨瓣修复下颌骨缺损术后义齿修复的临床分析[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2024, 56(1): 66-73.
[4] 李穗,马雯洁,王时敏,丁茜,孙瑶,张磊. 上前牙种植单冠修复体切导的数字化设计正确度[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2024, 56(1): 81-87.
[5] 刘晓强,周寅. 牙种植同期植骨术围术期高血压的相关危险因素[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2024, 56(1): 93-98.
[6] 段登辉,WANGHom-Lay,王恩博. 可吸收胶原膜在颊侧袋形瓣引导性骨再生手术中的作用: 一项回顾性影像学队列研究[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2023, 55(6): 1097-1104.
[7] 丁茜,李文锦,孙丰博,谷景华,林元华,张磊. 表面处理对氧化钇和氧化镁稳定的氧化锆种植体晶相及断裂强度的影响[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2023, 55(4): 721-728.
[8] 欧蒙恩,丁云,唐卫峰,周永胜. 基台边缘-牙冠的平台转移结构中粘接剂流动的三维有限元分析[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2023, 55(3): 548-552.
[9] 孙菲,刘建,李思琪,危伊萍,胡文杰,王翠. 种植体黏膜下微生物在健康种植体和种植体周炎中的构成与差异:一项横断面研究[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2023, 55(1): 30-37.
[10] 刘云松,周倜,叶红强. 前牙美学修复的整体策略及细节剖析[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2022, 54(1): 1-6.
[11] 孙菲,李思琪,危伊萍,钟金晟,王翠,胡文杰. 种植体周病非手术治疗中联合应用甘氨酸粉喷砂的临床效果评价[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2022, 54(1): 119-125.
[12] 李怡,王丽瑜,刘晓强,周倜,吕季喆,谭建国. 不同材料及厚度椅旁CAD/CAM瓷贴面的边缘特征[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2022, 54(1): 140-145.
[13] 王鹃,尉华杰,孙井德,邱立新. 预成刚性连接杆用于无牙颌种植即刻印模制取的应用评价[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2022, 54(1): 187-192.
[14] 邱淑婷,朱玉佳,王时敏,王飞龙,叶红强,赵一姣,刘云松,王勇,周永胜. 姿势微笑位口唇对称参考平面的数字化构建及初步应用验证[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2022, 54(1): 193-199.
[15] 徐欣然,霍芃呈,和璐,孟焕新,朱筠轩,靳东思奇. 伴与不伴糖尿病的牙周炎患者牙周基础治疗的疗效比较及其与白细胞水平的相关分析[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2022, 54(1): 48-53.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!