北京大学学报(医学版) ›› 2018, Vol. 50 ›› Issue (1): 110-116. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1671-167X.2018.01.019

• 论著 • 上一篇    下一篇

锥形束CT用于评估牙槽骨骨缺损的情况和骨再生区域骨密度的变化

曹婕1,孟焕新2△   

  1. (1.北京大学口腔医学院·口腔医院,第二门诊部口腔数字化医疗技术和材料国家工程实验室口腔数字医学北京市重点实验室, 北京100101; 2. 北京大学口腔医学院·口腔医院牙周科, 北京100081)
  • 出版日期:2018-02-18 发布日期:2018-02-18
  • 通讯作者: 孟焕新 E-mail: kqhxmeng@bjmu.edu.cn

Evaluation of using cone beam computed tomography as a regular test before and after periodontal regenerative surgery#br#

CAO Jie1, MENG Huan-xin2△   

  1. (1. Second Clinical Division, Peking University School and Hospital of Stomatology & National Engineering Laboratory for Digital and Material Technology of Stomatology & Beijing Key Laboratory of Digital Stomatology, Beijing 100101, China; 2. Department of Periodontology, Peking University School and Hospital of Stomatology, Beijing 100081, China)
  • Online:2018-02-18 Published:2018-02-18
  • Contact: MENG Huan-xin E-mail: kqhxmeng@bjmu.edu.cn

摘要: 目的:检验牙周再生性手术前用锥形束CT(cone beam computed tomography,CBCT)测量牙槽骨缺损高度和体积的精确性,通过比较手术前后CBCT测得的骨密度值来确定其评估牙周再生性手术疗效的检查时机。方法:对9例患者口内的10颗因牙周破坏造成的三壁骨袋进行再生性手术,术前拍摄CBCT和平行投照根尖片,测量骨缺损的高度,并利用CBCT数据测量骨缺损体积及骨缺损周边区域的骨密度。在牙周再生性手术过程中测量骨缺损的高度,并在术中充填骨蜡以获得缺损区域的体积。术后6、12、24周再次拍摄CBCT,测量原骨缺损区域的骨密度。结果:Wilcoxon检验非参数检验显示,术前用根尖片测量的骨缺损高度比术中测量结果高出(0.822±0.222)mm,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05),但术前CBCT测量结果只较术中测量结果降低(0.150±0.171)mm(P>0.05),可见CBCT测量结果比根尖片更精确。回归分析和BlandAltman图也提示CBCT测量结果较根尖片精确。Wilcoxon检验提示,术前CBCT测量的骨缺损体积与术中测量值的差值在0.38~2.83 mm3之间,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。CBCT测量的原骨缺损区域的骨密度(CT值)在再生性手术后第6、12和24周分别是原骨缺损周边区域的(0.49±0.03)倍、(0.74±0.09)倍和(1.16±0.11)倍,可见术后24周时骨再生区域骨密度更接近术前骨缺损周边区域骨密度。结论:CBCT可以在牙周再生性手术前精确测量牙槽骨缺损的高度和体积,可选择在术后24周时拍摄CBCT进行疗效评估。

关键词: 锥束计算机体层摄影术, 牙槽骨质丢失, 骨密度, 牙周组织, 再生

Abstract: Objective:To test the accuracy and credibility of cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) on measuring the height and volume of alveolar bone defects before periodontal regeneration surgery. By comparing the bone density measured by CBCT before and after the operation, the time to evaluate the efficacy of the periodontal regenerative surgery would be determined. Methods: Periodontal regenerative surgeries were performed on three-wall bone defects of ten teeth in nine patients. The height of bone defects was measured using both periapical film of distant parallel technique and CBCT before periodontal regenerative surgery. Before the surgery, CBCT data were used to measure the volume of the bone defects and the bone density around the defective areas. The height of the bone defects was measured during pe-riodontal regeneration surgery, and the volume of the defective areas was obtained with bone wax in opera-tion. CBCT was taken 6, 12 and 24 weeks after surgery to measure the bone density in the regenerated region. Results: The Wilcoxon test showed that the height of the bone defects measured preoperatively using periapical film was (0.822±0.222) mm deeper than the intraoperative measurement results, and the difference was statistically significant (P<0.05). Whereas CBCT measurement results was (0.150±0.171) mm less than the intraoperative measurement results, without statistical significant (P>0.05). The regression analysis and the Bland-Altman method also showed that the results of CBCT measurement were more accurate. The Wilcoxon test showed that the bone defect volume measured by CBCT preoperatively was accurate, and the difference between the preoperative and the intraoperative measurements was not statistically significant, ranging from 0.38 to 2.83 mm3 (P>0.05). The bone density of the regenerated areas measured by CBCT was (0.49±0.03) times in the sixth week, (0.74±0.09) times in the twelfth week and (1.16±0.11) times in the twentieth week as that of the areas around the bone defects after the surgery. Conclusion: The present data suggest that using CBCT before periodontal regenerative surgery could result in accurate measurement of height and volume of al-veolar bone defects. For the purpose of evaluating the effectiveness of regenerative surgery, CBCT could be taken 24 weeks after surgery.

Key words: Cone-beam computed tomography, Alveolar bone loss, Bone density, Periodontium, Regeneration

中图分类号: 

  • R781.42
[1] 李峥, 吕珑薇, 张晓, 夏丹丹, 张萍, 刘云松, 周永胜. 基于干细胞和生物材料调控的口腔颅颌面骨再生的研究进展[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2026, 58(2): 272-277.
[2] 张晗, 杨馥嘉, 杨瑞莉. 干细胞功能调控在颅颌面组织再生修复中的研究进展[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2026, 58(2): 285-289.
[3] 王昕莹, 程雪原, 张孟钧, 李菲, 段晋瑜, 乔静. 浓缩生长因子联合引导性组织再生术治疗下颌磨牙根分叉病变的疗效[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2026, 58(2): 372-379.
[4] 欧乾民, 李政诗, 牛露菡, 任倩慧, 刘欣雨, 毛学理, 施松涛. 口腔干细胞的生物学特性与转化研究[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2025, 57(5): 827-835.
[5] 王宇蓝, 曾浩, 张玉峰. 口腔种植中血浆基质的临床转化现状与前沿探索[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2025, 57(5): 836-840.
[6] 马保金, 李建华, 桑元华, 于洋, 仇吉川, 邵金龙, 李凯, 刘世岳, 杜密, 商玲玲, 葛少华. 基于微环境和干细胞调控的牙周组织再生关键技术的建立与应用[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2025, 57(5): 841-846.
[7] 王昕莹, 程雪原, 张勇, 李菲, 段晋瑜, 乔静. 浓缩生长因子与自固化磷酸钙人工骨联合治疗牙周骨下袋缺损的疗效:临床和影像学评价[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2025, 57(1): 42-50.
[8] 凌晓彤,屈留洋,郑丹妮,杨静,闫雪冰,柳登高,高岩. 牙源性钙化囊肿与牙源性钙化上皮瘤的三维影像特点[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2024, 56(1): 131-137.
[9] 赵菡,卫彦,张学慧,杨小平,蔡晴,宁成云,徐明明,刘雯雯,黄颖,何颖,郭亚茹,江圣杰,白云洋,吴宇佳,郭雨思,郑晓娜,李文静,邓旭亮. 口腔硬组织修复材料仿生设计制备和临床转化[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2024, 56(1): 4-8.
[10] 潘媛,顾航,肖涵,赵笠君,汤祎熳,葛雯姝. 泛素特异性蛋白酶42调节人脂肪干细胞成骨向分化[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2024, 56(1): 9-16.
[11] 刘晓强,周寅. 牙种植同期植骨术围术期高血压的相关危险因素[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2024, 56(1): 93-98.
[12] 段登辉,WANGHom-Lay,王恩博. 可吸收胶原膜在颊侧袋形瓣引导性骨再生手术中的作用: 一项回顾性影像学队列研究[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2023, 55(6): 1097-1104.
[13] 代云飞,刘鹤,彭楚芳,姜玺军. 年轻恒牙牙髓再生治疗术后36个月的临床疗效评估[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2023, 55(4): 729-735.
[14] 甄敏,孟焕新,胡文杰,武登诚,危伊萍. 改良牙冠延长术后组织愈合的动物实验研究[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2022, 54(5): 927-935.
[15] 敖英芳,曹宸喜. 解析与重塑软骨组织修复再生微环境[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2021, 53(5): 819-822.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!