北京大学学报(医学版) ›› 2018, Vol. 50 ›› Issue (1): 165-169. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1671-167X.2018.01.028

• 论著 • 上一篇    下一篇

口服洛索洛芬钠片在拔除阻生齿中的超前镇痛

孟甜,张智勇,张晓△,陈宇寰,李京琦,陈全,刘文曙,高巍   

  1. (北京大学口腔医学院·口腔医院,第一门诊部口腔数字化医疗技术和材料国家工程实验室口腔数字医学北京市重点实验室, 北京100034)
  • 出版日期:2018-02-18 发布日期:2018-02-18
  • 通讯作者: 张晓 E-mail:zhangxiao1965@vip.sina.com

Preemptive analgesia with loxoprofen sodiumorally in extraction of impacted teeth

MENG Tian, ZHANG Zhi-yong, ZHANG Xiao△, CHEN Yu-huan, LI Jing-qi, CHENG Quan, LIU Wen-shu, GAO Wei   

  1. (First Clinical Division, Peking University School and Hospital of Stomatology & National Engineering Laboratory for Digi-tal and Material Technology of Stomatology & Beijing Key Laboratory of Digital Stomatology, Beijing 100034,China)
  • Online:2018-02-18 Published:2018-02-18
  • Contact: ZHANG Xiao E-mail:zhangxiao1965@vip.sina.com

摘要: 目的:研究口服非甾体类抗炎药洛索洛芬钠片在下颌阻生第三磨牙拔除术中超前镇痛的临床效果。方法:2017年6—8月北京大学口腔医院第一门诊部向拔除下颌阻生第三磨牙的患者发放术后疼痛调查问卷。根据患者实际初次口服洛索洛芬钠片的时机,患者被分为3组:未服药组(术前、术后均未口服洛索洛芬钠片)、术前服药组(术前30 min口服洛索洛芬钠片60 mg)和术后服药组(术后30 min口服洛索洛芬钠片60 mg)。统计指标为手术时间,术后2、4、12、24、48 h的疼痛视觉模拟评分 (visual analogue scales, VAS),离院后服用洛索洛芬钠的人数以及药物不良反应。结果:3组手术时间均为15.0 (5.0,30.0) min,3组手术时间差异无统计学意义(P=0.848)。未服药组术后2、4、12、24、48 h的评分分别为1.75 (0.1,10.0)、6.25 (1.5,10.0)、2.00 (0.1,8.0)、2.00 (0.1,6.0)和0.5 (0.1,5.5), 差异有统计学意义(P<0.001),术后4 h评分高于其他时间点(P<0.005)。在术后4 h,术前服药组评分[2.0 (0.1,10.0)]和术后服药组评分[2.0 (0.1,5.0)]均低于于未服药组评分[6.25 (1.5,10.0)],差异有统计学意义(P<0.001)。离院后服用洛索洛芬钠片的人数未服药组9人(40.9%),术前服药组5人(21.8%),术后服药组7人(33.3%)。术前服药组药物不良反应发生率(3/23,13.0%)和术后服药组药物不良反应发生率(4/21,19.0%)低于未服药组药物不良反应发生率(8/22,36.4%)。结论:两种超前镇痛的方案,即术前30 min口服洛索洛芬钠片60 mg和术后30 min口服洛索洛芬钠片60 mg,在下颌阻生第三磨牙拔除中都可以有效减轻术后疼痛。

关键词: 阻生齿, 超前镇痛, 非甾体类抗炎药

Abstract: Objective:To investigate the effectiveness of preemptive analgesia with loxoprofen sodium orally, which was a kind of non-steroid anti-inflammatory drugs, in extractions of mandibular impacted third teeth. Methods: There were questionnaires about postoperative pain for patients whose mandibular impacted third teeth were extracted from July 2017 to August 2017 in First Clinical Division of Peking University School and Hospital of Stomatology. All the patients did their routine clinical examinations and imaging examinations. After their mandibular impacted third teeth were extracted, the questionnaires were sent to them. The questionnaires were filled in by the patients on their own and returned one week later. There were 120 questionnaires that were sent and 105 questionnaires returned, of which 98 questionnaires were filled in completely. According to the inclusive criteria and exclusion criteria, 66 questionnaires were totally selected in this study. According to the time when the patients took their loxoprofen sodium orally firstly, the patients were divided into 3 groups. The first group was for patients who didn’t take loxoprofen sodium during their extractions (non-medicine group). The second group was for patients who took 60 mg loxoprofen sodium 30 min before their extractions (preoperative group). The third group was for patients who took 60 mg loxoprofen sodium 30 min after their extractions (postoperative group). The operation time among the 3 groups was analyzed by Kruskal-Wallis method. The postoperative time points were 2, 4, 12,24 and 48 h after operation. The scores of visual analogue scales (VAS) for postoperative pain in each group at different postoperative time points were analyzed by Friedman method. At each postoperative time point, VAS scores in the different groups were analyzed by Kruskal-Wallis me-thod. The numbers of the patients taking loxoprofen sodium home and drug adverse reactions were also analyzed. Results: The operation time of the 3 groups was 15.0 (5.0,30.0) min and had no significant differences (P=0.848).VAS scores of non-medicine group 2,4, 12,24 and 48 h after operation were 1.75 (0.1,10.0), 6.25 (1.5,10.0), 2.00 (0.1,8.0), 2.00 (0.1,6.0) and 0.5 (0.1,5.5) separately and had significant differences (P<0.001).The VAS score at 4 h after operation was higher than the VAS scores at other time points after operation (P<0.005). Four hours after the operations, the VAS scores of preoperative group [2.0 (0.1,10.0)] and postoperative group [2.0 (0.1,5.0)] were lower significantly than those of non-medicine group [6.25 (1.5,10.0)] (P<0.001).The numbers of the patients taking loxoprofen sodium home were 9(40.9%) in non-medicine group,5(21.8%) in preoperative group and 7(33.3%) in postoperative group. The number of the patients who had drug adverse reactions in preoperative group (n=3,13.0%) and in postoperative group (n=4,19.0%) was less than the number of the patients who had drug adverse reactions in non-medicine group (n=8,36.4%). Conclusion: There were two protocols of preemptive analgesia with loxoprofen sodium orally in extractions of mandibular impacted third teeth, which were taking 60 mg loxoprofen sodium orally 30 min before the extractions and taking 60 mg loxoprofen sodium orally 30 min after the extractions. Both of the two preemptive analgesia protocols could decrease the postoperative pain significantly.

Key words: Impacted tooth, Preemptive analgesia, Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs

中图分类号: 

  • R782.1
[1] 王月, 梁宇红. 繁茂型牙骨质-骨结构不良1例[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2026, 58(1): 220-224.
[2] 张斯巧, 刘建, 徐涛, 胡文杰, 张浩筠, 危伊萍. 异种骨与人工合成骨在磨牙拔牙同期微翻瓣牙槽嵴保存术中的临床效果比较[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2026, 58(1): 74-83.
[3] 于子杨, 郭厚佐, 蒋析, 韩玮华, 林野. 穿颧种植体上颌窦段成骨的影像学研究[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2025, 57(5): 967-974.
[4] 宋凤岐, 徐心雨, 刘筱菁, 李自力. 上颌骨前部和整体顺时针旋转改善骨性Ⅲ类牙颌面畸形患者鼻旁凹陷的对比[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2025, 57(5): 980-988.
[5] 仇师禹, 练洋, 康一帆, 张雷, 蔡义望, 单小峰, 蔡志刚. 基于下颌骨数据库和全连接神经网络的三维检索模型辅助下的下颌骨个性化重建[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2025, 57(2): 360-368.
[6] 王菲, 张馨月, 刘木清, 王恩博, 段登辉. 顺牙长轴拔牙法在下颌近中与水平智齿拔除术中的应用及三维有限元分析[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2025, 57(1): 106-112.
[7] 石宇彤, 危伊萍, 胡文杰, 徐涛, 张浩筠. 罹患重度牙周炎下颌磨牙拔牙微翻瓣牙槽嵴保存效果评价[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2025, 57(1): 33-41.
[8] 李穗,马雯洁,王时敏,丁茜,孙瑶,张磊. 上前牙种植单冠修复体切导的数字化设计正确度[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2024, 56(1): 81-87.
[9] 刘晓强,周寅. 牙种植同期植骨术围术期高血压的相关危险因素[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2024, 56(1): 93-98.
[10] 段登辉,WANGHom-Lay,王恩博. 可吸收胶原膜在颊侧袋形瓣引导性骨再生手术中的作用: 一项回顾性影像学队列研究[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2023, 55(6): 1097-1104.
[11] 甄敏,孟焕新,胡文杰,武登诚,危伊萍. 改良牙冠延长术后组织愈合的动物实验研究[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2022, 54(5): 927-935.
[12] 姜又升,冯琳,高学军. 垫底材料弹性模量对髓腔固位冠修复后上颌前磨牙应力分布的影响[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2021, 53(4): 764-769.
[13] 黄丽东,宫玮玉,董艳梅. 生物活性玻璃对人脐静脉血管内皮细胞增殖及成血管的作用[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2021, 53(2): 371-377.
[14] 王思雯,尤鹏越,刘玉华,王新知,唐琳,王梅. 两种可吸收生物膜联合去蛋白牛骨基质植入犬拔牙窝成骨的影像学评价[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2021, 53(2): 364-370.
[15] 姜楠,包旭东,岳林. 全冠预备体终止线局部扫描正确度对整体的影响[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2021, 53(1): 102-108.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!