北京大学学报(医学版) ›› 2020, Vol. 52 ›› Issue (4): 614-620. doi: 10.19723/j.issn.1671-167X.2020.04.003

• 论著 • 上一篇    下一篇

血浆游离型甲氧基肾上腺素类物质检测正常的嗜铬细胞瘤和副神经节瘤的临床特点

刘鹭1,田杰2,吴恺1,高莹1,(),张争2,(),张俊清1,郭晓蕙1   

  1. 1.北京大学第一医院 内分泌科,北京 100034
    2.北京大学第一医院 内分泌科泌尿外科,北京 100034
  • 收稿日期:2020-03-16 出版日期:2020-08-18 发布日期:2020-08-06
  • 通讯作者: 高莹,张争 E-mail:bjgaoying@yahoo.com;doczhz@aliyun.com
  • 基金资助:
    北京大学临床研究项目(PUCRP201302);北京大学医学交叉研究种子基金(BMU2018MX026);北京大学第一医院科研种子基金(2018SF066)

Clinical profile of pheochromocytoma and paraganglioma with normal plasma free metanephrines

Lu LIU1,Jie TIAN2,Kai WU1,Ying GAO1,(),Zheng ZHANG2,(),Jun-qing ZHANG1,Xiao-hui GUO1   

  1. 1. Department of Endocrinology, Peking University First Hospital, Beijing 100034, China
    2. Department of Urology, Peking University First Hospital, Beijing 100034, China
  • Received:2020-03-16 Online:2020-08-18 Published:2020-08-06
  • Contact: Ying GAO,Zheng ZHANG E-mail:bjgaoying@yahoo.com;doczhz@aliyun.com
  • Supported by:
    PUHSC Clinical Research Project(PUCRP201302);Interdisciplinary Medicine Seed Fund of Peking University(BMU2018MX026);the Scientific Research Seed Fund of Peking University First Hospital(2018SF066)

RICH HTML

  

摘要:

目的: 分析散发嗜铬细胞瘤和副神经节瘤(pheochromocytoma and paraganglioma,PPGL)患者中血浆游离型甲氧基肾上腺素类物质(metanephrines,MNs)正常者的临床特点,MNs已作为PPGL的首选检测方法在临床中广泛应用,MNs正常的PPGL较少见。方法: 选择2015年3月—2020年1月于北京大学第一医院行泌尿外科手术,病理确诊为PPGL的散发患者共104例,所有患者均有术前血浆游离型MNs检测结果,其中8例(7.69%)MNs正常。回顾MNs正常患者的就诊原因,临床表现,术前检测血浆游离型MNs、3-甲氧基酪胺(3-methoxytyramine, 3-MT)、血儿茶酚胺和嗜铬粒蛋白A(chromograninA, CgA)的结果,影像学表现,术前诊断,术前用药准备,术中血压波动情况及肿瘤组织病理学特点,并与同期MNs升高的PPGL患者相比较。对MNs正常患者进行术后随访。结果: MNs正常的8例PPGL患者中,最常见的临床症状为多汗(3/8)、腰腹痛(3/8)、头痛(2/8)、心悸(2/8)和疲乏(2/8)。对比MNs正常组和升高组患者的其他生化检验结果,血3-MT、儿茶酚胺诊断阳性率组间差异无统计学意义,血浆CgA诊断阳性率在MNs正常组显著下降(2/5 vs.41/43,P=0.005)。两组患者增强CT出现典型表现的比例差异无统计学意义。在8例MNs正常患者中,6例因明确的PPGL既往史,或典型的症状及CT表现,3-MT、CgA升高,PET-CT阳性等原因诊断为PPGL,2例误诊为无功能腺瘤或原发性醛固酮增多症。全部MNs正常患者均应用α受体阻滞剂术前准备,其中1例出现术中平均动脉压<60 mmHg。8例术后随访的中位时间为1.5(0.5~4.5)年,增强CT检查均未见新发肿瘤证据。2例MNs正常患者术后复查3-MT和(或)CgA降至正常。结论: 对于出现PPGL典型症状的肾上腺或腹膜后肿瘤患者及有PPGL既往史患者,MNs检测正常不能作为排除PPGL的充分依据。血3-MT、儿茶酚胺、CgA及影像学检查或对PPGL的诊断有帮助。怀疑MNs正常的PPGL患者推荐应用α受体阻滞剂术前准备,但应避免过量。MNs正常患者的术后随访应重点监测术前阳性的生化指标。

关键词: 嗜铬细胞瘤, 副神经节瘤, 甲氧基肾上腺素类物质, 诊断

Abstract:

Objective: Plasma free metanephrines (MNs) have been widely used as an initial test for pheochromocytoma and paraganglioma (PPGL). PPGL without MNs elevation has been reported on rare occasions. The objective of this study was to analyze the clinical profile of sporadic PPGL patients with normal MNs. Methods: In the study, 104 patients with sporadic PPGL diagnosed by histopathology in Peking University First Hospital from March 2015 to January 2020 were enrolled. All the patients had plasma MNs result, of whom, eight (7.69%) were with normal MNs. The reasons for their medical visits, clinical manifestations, the levels of plasma free MNs, 3-methoxytyramine (3-MT), catecholamines and chromogranin A (CgA), and the imaging findings were documented. Their preoperative diagnosis, perioperative medical management, and intraoperative blood pressure were analyzed. All the data mentioned above were compared with the MNs elevated group. The postoperative follow-up for MNs normal patients were applied. Results: For the eight PPGL patients with normal plasma MNs, the most common clinical symptoms were sweating (3/8), abdominal and back pain (3/8), headache (2/8), palpitations (2/8), and fatigue (2/8). There were no significant differences in plasma free 3-MT and catecholamines’ diagnostic positive rate between the MNs normal group and MNs elevated group, but the rate for plasma CgA was significantly decreased in the MNs normal group (2/5 vs. 41/43, P=0.005). No significant difference was found for the incidence of typical findings by enhanced CT between the two groups. In these eight MNs normal patients, six were diagnosed with PPGL by the previous history of PPGL, typical symptoms and CT findings, or elevation of 3-MT, CgA levels or positive results of PET-CT; two patients were misdiagnosed as nonfunctioning adenoma or primary aldosteronism. All these MNs normal patients underwent preoperative management with alpha adrenergic receptor blockers, of whom, one had an average intraoperative arterial pressure <60 mmHg during surgery. The median follow-up time for the eight patients was 1.5 (0.5-4.5) years. No evidence of new tumors was found on the enhanced CT scans. Two MNs normal patients’ plasma 3-MT and (or) CgA decreased to normal. Conclusion: For patients with adrenal or retroperitoneal tumors, typical symptoms or a previous history of PPGL, normal plasma MNs is not a sufficient exclusion for PPGL. Plasma 3-MT, catecholamine, CgA results and the imaging findings are helpful for the diagnosis of PPGL. We recommend patients with suspected MNs normal PPGL take alpha adrenergic receptor blockers as preoperative blockade, but should avoid overdose. Postoperative follow-up for patients with normal MNs should focus on the positive biochemical markers before surgery.

Key words: Pheochromocytoma, Paraganglioma, Metanephrines, Diagnosis

中图分类号: 

  • R736

表1

血浆游离型MNs正常的PPGL患者的临床特点"

表2

血浆游离型MNS正常的PPGL患者围手术期和随访资料"

表3

MNs正常与MNs升高PPGL患者临床资料的比较"

Items All patients MNs normal MNs elevated P value
Total, n 104 8 96
Male/female 49/55 2/6 47/49 0.349
Age/years 46(11-76) 55(23-70) 46(11-76) 0.494
Initial/recurrence, n/N 100/4 6/2 94/2 0.029
PCC/PGL, n/N 80/24 6/2 74/22 1.000
Metastasis, n 4 1 3 0.278
Symptoms, n/N
Headache 42/104 2/8 40/96 0.584
Palpitations 42/104 2/8 40/96 0.584
Sweating 37/104 3/8 34/96 1.000
Dizziness 18/104 1/8 17/96 1.000
Abdominal/back pain 17/104 3/8 14/96 0.235
Pallor 10/104 0/8 10/96 1.000
Nausea/vomiting 11/104 1/8 10/96 1.000
Fatigue 7/104 2/8 5/96 0.090
Hypertension 80/104 7/8 73/96 0.762
Classic triad, n/N
3 presented 14/104 1/8 13/96 1.000
1-2 presented 54/104 3/8 51/96 0.630
None presented 36/104 4/8 32/96 0.572
BMI/(kg/m2) 22.65(15.77-32.53) 25.56(17.67-27.85) 22.42(15.77-32.53) 0.118
Tumor diameter/cm 5.00(1.20-14.00) 4.75(1.20-6.00) 5.00(1.50-14.00) 0.081

表4

MNs正常与MNs升高PPGL患者生化检测及影像学指标"

MNs normal MNs elevated P value
MN/(nmol/L) 0.11(<0.08-0.22) 0.71(<0.08->20.56)
MN, n/N 0/8 45/96 0.028
NMN/(nmol/L) 0.395(0.20-0.71) 4.87(0.42->20.56)
NMN, n/N 0/8 94/96 0.000
3-MT/(nmol/L) <0.08(<0.08-2.27) 0.12(<0.08-0.46)
3-MT, n/N 2/7 6/93 0.096
E/(pmol/L) 0.049(0.027-0.169) 0.087(0.027-89.138)
E, n/N 0/3 6/40 1.000
NE/(pmol/L) 8.523(0.467-22.367) 9.836(0.284-147.23)
NE, n/N 2/3 31/40 0.558
DA/(pmol/L) 0.052(0.039-0.157) 0.056(0.033-1.18)
DA, n/N 0/3 2/40 1.000
CgA/(μg/L) 60.02(34.37-1295.36) 369.37(36.85-1669.96)
CgA, n/N 2/5 41/43 0.005
Classic findings of CT, n/N 5/8 85/96 0.125
[1] Lenders JW, Pacak K, Walther MM, et al. Biochemical diagnosis of pheochromocytoma: which test is best[J]. JAMA, 2002,287(11):1427-1434.
doi: 10.1001/jama.287.11.1427 pmid: 11903030
[2] Unger N, Pitt C, Schmidt IL, et al. Diagnostic value of various biochemical parameters for the diagnosis of pheochromocytoma in patients with adrenal mass[J]. Eur J Endocrinol, 2006,154(3):409-417.
pmid: 16498054
[3] Hickman PE, Leong M, Chang J, et al. Plasma free metanephrines are superior to urine and plasma catecholamines and urine catecholamine metabolites for the investigation of phaeochromocytoma[J]. Pathology, 2009,41(2):173-177.
[4] Grouzmann E, Drouard-Troalen L, Baudin E, et al. Diagnostic accuracy of free and total metanephrines in plasma and fractionated metanephrines in urine of patients with pheochromocytoma[J]. Eur J Endocrinol, 2010,162(5):951-960.
pmid: 20142367
[5] Unger N, Hinrichs J, Deutschbein T, et al. Plasma and urinary metanephrines determined by an enzyme immunoassay, but not serum chromogranin A for the diagnosis of pheochromocytoma in patients with adrenal mass[J]. Exp Clin Endocrinol Diabetes, 2012,120(8):494-500.
doi: 10.1055/s-0032-1309007 pmid: 22696168
[6] Lenders JW, Duh QY, Eisenhofer G, et al. Pheochromocytoma and paraganglioma: an endocrine society clinical practice guideline[J]. J Clin Endocrinol Metab, 2014,99(6):1915-1942.
[7] 中华医学会内分泌学分会肾上腺学组. 嗜铬细胞瘤和副神经节瘤诊断治疗的专家共识[J]. 中华内分泌代谢杂志, 2016,32(3):181-187.
[8] Plouin PF, Amar L, Dekkers OM, et al. European society of endocrinology clinical practice guideline for long-term follow-up of patients operated on for a phaeochromocytoma or a paraganglioma[J]. Eur J Endocrinol, 2016,174(5):G1-G10.
[9] Bozin M, Lamb A, Putra LJ. Pheochromocytoma with negative metanephrines: a rarity and the significance of dopamine secreting tumors[J]. Urol Case Rep, 2017,12:51-53.
pmid: 28337414
[10] 曹万里, 黄宝星, 成康, 等. 血浆游离甲氧肾上腺素和甲氧基去甲肾上腺素正常的嗜铬细胞瘤/副神经节瘤患者的临床特点[J]. 中华临床医师杂志: 电子版, 2015,9(2):200-205.
[11] 刘颖姝, 李乐乐, 窦京涛, 等. 偶发嗜铬细胞瘤患者术中血流动力学变化的相关因素[J]. 中华医学杂志, 2018,98(36):2905-2909.
[12] Poudyal S, Pradhan M, Chapagain S, et al. Marker-negative pheochromocytoma associated with inferior vena cava thrombosis[J/OL]. Case Rep Urol, 2017, 2017: 6270436(2017-06-15)[2020-03-01]. https://www.hindawi.com/journals/criu/2017/6270436/.
[13] Lopez-Gomez J, Salazar-Alvarez MA, Adame RY, et al. Metasta-tic pheochromocytoma to liver without elevation of metanephrines and catecholamines[J]. Int J Surg Case Rep, 2016,29:71-75.
pmid: 27821293
[14] Kota SK, Kota SK, Panda S, et al. Pheochromocytoma: an uncommon presentation of an asymptomatic and biochemically silent adrenal incidentaloma[J]. Malays J Med Sci, 2012,19(2):86-91.
[15] Heavner MG, Krane LS, Winters SM, et al. Pheochromocytoma diagnosed pathologically with previous negative serum markers[J]. J Surg Oncol, 2015,112(5):492-495.
pmid: 26384104
[16] Eisenhofer G, Lenders JW, Goldstein DS, et al. Pheochromocytoma catecholamine phenotypes and prediction of tumor size and location by use of plasma free metanephrines[J]. Clin Chem, 2005,51(4):735-744.
pmid: 15718487
[17] Pillai D, Ross HA, Kratzsch J, et al. Proficiency test of plasma free and total metanephrines: report from a study group[J]. Clin Chem Lab Med, 2009,47(6):786-790.
pmid: 19445649
[18] Pillai D, Callen S. Pilot quality assurance programme for plasma metanephrines[J]. Ann Clin Biochem, 2010,47(Pt 2):137-142.
[1] 陈心心, 唐哲, 乔艳春, 荣文笙. 北京市密云区4岁儿童患龋状况及其与龋活跃性检测的相关性[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2024, 56(5): 833-838.
[2] 钟华, 李原, 徐丽玲, 白明欣, 苏茵. 18F-FDG PET/CT在风湿免疫病中的应用[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2024, 56(5): 853-859.
[3] 李正芳,罗采南,武丽君,吴雪,孟新艳,陈晓梅,石亚妹,钟岩. 抗氨基甲酰化蛋白抗体在诊断类风湿关节炎中的应用价值[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2024, 56(4): 729-734.
[4] 姚海红,杨帆,唐素玫,张霞,何菁,贾园. 系统性红斑狼疮及成人Still病合并巨噬细胞活化综合征的临床特点及诊断指标[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2023, 55(6): 966-974.
[5] 熊焰,李鑫,梁丽,李东,鄢丽敏,李雪迎,邸吉廷,李挺. 甲状腺粗针穿刺活检病理诊断的准确性评估[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2023, 55(2): 234-242.
[6] 哈雪梅,姚永正,孙莉华,辛春杨,熊焰. 实性肺胎盘样变形1例及文献复习[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2023, 55(2): 357-361.
[7] 宁博涵,张青霞,杨慧,董颖. 伴间质细胞增生、玻璃样变性及索状结构的子宫内膜样腺癌1例[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2023, 55(2): 366-369.
[8] 陈适,刘田. 重视系统性血管炎的早期识别和个体化治疗[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2022, 54(6): 1065-1067.
[9] 曹瑞洁,姚中强,焦朋清,崔立刚. 不同分类标准对中国大动脉炎的诊断效能比较[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2022, 54(6): 1128-1133.
[10] 徐朝焰,林长艺,叶达梅,吴培埕,宋明辉,刘有添,邓琼,黄雪艳,范忠晓,游雪兰. 感染性关节炎诊断分析[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2022, 54(6): 1234-1237.
[11] 郝哲,岳蜀华,周利群. 拉曼技术在泌尿系统肿瘤检测中的应用[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2022, 54(4): 779-784.
[12] 于博,赵扬玉,张喆,王永清. 妊娠合并感染性心内膜炎1例[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2022, 54(3): 578-580.
[13] 孟广艳,张筠肖,张渝昕,刘燕鹰. IgG4相关性疾病中枢神经系统受累的临床特点分析[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2021, 53(6): 1043-1048.
[14] 翟莉,邱楠,宋惠. 多中心网状组织细胞增生症1例[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2021, 53(6): 1183-1187.
[15] 刘磊,秦艳春,王国良,张树栋,侯小飞,马潞林. 嗜铬细胞瘤和副神经节瘤二次手术策略[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2021, 53(4): 793-797.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!