三维图像融合技术评价上颌全牙列种植固定修复前后的鼻唇软组织形态变化

doi:10.19723/j.issn.1671-167X.2020.05.022

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

目的:探讨利用面部与义齿三维(three dimensional,3D)图像融合方法评估全牙列种植固定修复前后鼻唇区软组织形态变化的可行性。方法:选择于北京大学口腔医院种植科就诊的上颌无牙颌患者共12例(女性4例、男性8例),平均年龄(54.82±5.50)岁(45~62岁)。于上颌植入4~6枚种植体,6个月后为患者佩戴全牙列固定义齿,捕捉患者佩戴义齿前后的3D面相及义齿形态数据。将三维数据置于同一坐标系中,对义齿和软组织标志点进行测量,分别比较各标志点[左口角点(cheilion left, CHL)、右口角点(cheilion right, CHR)、左唇峰点(crista philtri left,CPHL)、右唇峰点(crista philtri right, CPHR)、上唇缘点(labrale superius, LS)、鼻下点(subnasale, SN)、口裂正中点(stomion,STO)、上中切牙点(upper incisor, UI)、义齿上边缘顶点(F-point, F)]的位移量及标志点间线距[人中长度(SN-LS)、双唇峰间距(CPHR-CPHL)、口裂宽(CHR-CHL)、上唇红高度(LS-STO)]变化。结果:义齿与软组织拟合后,义齿上边缘顶点与鼻下点直线距离(F-SN)三次测量结果的一致性检验显示该方法可重复性好,组内相关系数(intraclass correlation coefficient, ICC)为0.983 (95%CI:0.957~0.995)。佩戴义齿后,软组织各标志点均发生前徙变化,鼻底区域变化最小,SN前后方向上的位移为(0.61±0.44) mm,LS前后向位移为(3.12±1.38) mm。在垂直方向上,SN、LS、CPHL、CPHR均向上移动,STO、CHL、CHR向下方少量移动。除SN-LS略微减小外,CHR-CHL、CPHR-CPHL、LS-STO均增大(P<0.01)。SN与F、LS与UI的Z轴坐标值均呈现高度相关(r=0.904 3、r=0.958 4)。结论:三维面像与义齿图像融合方法可重复性好,经该方法检测,义齿与软组织标志点的前后向位移之间存在高度相关性。

关键词: 人体测量术, 上颌牙列缺失, 牙种植, 图像处理, 计算机辅助

Abstract:

Objective: To explore the applicability of integration between three-dimensional (3D) facial and dental data to evaluate the nasolabial morphology variation before and after the cross-arch fixed restoration of the maxillary implant-supported prostheses. Methods: Twelve patients (4 women and 8 men), mean age (54.82±5.50) years (from 45 to 62 years) referred to the Department of Oral Implan-tology, Peking University School and Hospital of Stomatology, were selected and diagnosed with edentulous maxilla. For all the patients, 4 to 6 implants were inserted into the maxilla. Six months later, the final cross-arch fixed prostheses were delivered. The 3D facial images were collected before and after the final restoration. The 3D data of prostheses were also captured. All the 3D data were registered and measured in the same coordinate system. Then the displacement of all the landmarks [cheilion left (CHL), cheilion right (CHR), crista philtri left (CPHL), crista philtri right (CPHR), labrale supe-rius (LS), subnasale (SN), stomion (STO), upper incisor (UI), upper flange border of the prostheses (F-point, F)], and the variation of the distances between these landmarks (SN-LS, CPHR-CPHL, CHR-CHL, LS-STO) were analyzed and compared. Results: The consistency test among three measurements of the length of F-SN indicated that the integration method of the dental prostheses and soft tissue had the good repetitiveness, ICC=0.983 (95%CI: 0.957-0.995). After wearing the final cross-arch maxillary implant-supported prostheses, all the landmarks on the soft tissue moved forward. The nasal base area changed minimally, and the shift of SN in the sagittal direction was only (0.61±0.44) mm. But the sagittal shift of LS was (3.12±1.38) mm. In the vertical direction, SN, LS, CPHL, and CPHR moved upward. But STO, CHL, and CHR moved downward a little. Except for the slight decrease of the length of philtrum (SN-LS), the length of CHL-CHR, CPHL-CPHR, and the height of upper lip were increased together (P<0.01). In the direction of Z axis, the strong correlations were found not only between the movements of SN and F (r=0.904 3) but also between the movements of LS and UI (r=0.958 4). Conclusion: The integration method of 3D facial and dental data showed good repetitiveness. And the strong correlations between the landmarks of prostheses and nasolabial soft tissue in the sagittal direction were found by this new method.

Key words: Anthropometry, Edentulous maxilla, Dental implantation, Image processing, computer-assisted

中图分类号:

R783

郝柯屹,罗佳,邸萍,郭厚佐,沈惠丹,刘焱萍,张宇,林野. 三维图像融合技术评价上颌全牙列种植固定修复前后的鼻唇软组织形态变化[J]. 北京大学学报（医学版）, 2020, 52(5): 924-930.

Ke-yi HAO,Jia LUO,Ping DI,Hou-zuo GUO,Hui-dan SHEN,Yan-ping LIU,Yu ZHANG,Ye LIN. Validation of the digital integration technology for evaluating the nasolabial morphology variation after the cross-arch fixed restoration of maxillary implant-supported prostheses[J]. Journal of Peking University (Health Sciences), 2020, 52(5): 924-930.

图/表 8

图1

图2

图3

表1

图4

图5

表2

图6

参考文献 20

[1]	Kau CH, Richmond S, Zhurov A, et al. Use of 3-dimensional surface acquisition to study facial morphology in 5 populations[J]. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 2010,137(4 Suppl):S56-57. pmid: 20381762
[2]	Karatas OH, Toy E. Three-dimensional imaging techniques: A literature review[J]. Eur J Dent, 2014,8(1):132-140. pmid: 24966761
[3]	Maló P, de Araújo Nobre M, Lopes A, et al. “All-on-4” imme-diate-function concept for completely edentulous maxillae: a clinical report on the medium (3 years) and long-term (5 years) outcomes[J]. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res, 2012,14(Suppl 1):e139-150. doi: 10.1111/j.1708-8208.2011.00395.x
[4]	Lopes A, Maló P, de Araújo Nobre M, et al. The NobelGuide^® All-on-4^® treatment concept for rehabilitation of edentulous jaws: a retrospective report on the 7-years clinical and 5-years radiographic outcomes [J]. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res, 2017,19(2):233-244. pmid: 27758069
[5]	张宇, 林野, 刘洋, 等. 牙周炎晚期伴上颌牙槽骨前突畸形患者即刻种植全牙列固定修复的侧貌变化初探[J]. 中华口腔医学杂志, 2017,52(10):625-630.
[6]	邸萍, 林野, 李健慧, 等. 单颌拔牙后即刻种植即刻修复的临床回顾研究[J]. 中华口腔医学杂志, 2013,48(4):216-222.
[7]	Holzinger D, Seemann R, Matoni N, et al. Effect of dental implants on bisphosphonate-related osteonecrosis of the jaws[J]. J Oral Maxillofac Surg, 2014, 72(10): 1937.e1-8.
[8]	Tian K, Li Q, Wang X, et al. Reproducibility of natural head position in normal Chinese people[J]. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 2015,148(3):503-510. pmid: 26321348
[9]	Huang Y, Zhang X, Fan Y, et al. Reshaping 3D facial scans for facial appearance modeling and 3D facial expression analysis[J]. Image and Vision Computing, 2012,30(10):750-761. doi: 10.1016/j.imavis.2011.12.008
[10]	Littlefield T, Kelly K, Cherney J, et al. Development of a new three-dimensional cranial imaging system[J]. J Craniofac Surg, 2004,15(1):175-181. pmid: 14704586
[11]	Rangel FA, Maal TJ, Bergé SJ, et al. Integration of digital dental casts in 3-dimensional facial photographs[J]. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 2008,134(6):820-826. pmid: 19061810
[12]	Rosati R, De Menezes M, Rossetti A, et al. Digital dental cast placement in 3-dimensional, full-face reconstruction: a technical evaluation[J]. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 2010,138(1):84-88. pmid: 20620838
[13]	Avrampou M, Mericske-Stern R, Blatz MB, et al. Virtual implant planning in the edentulous maxilla: criteria for decision making of prosjournal design[J]. Clin Oral Implants Res, 2013,24(Suppl A100):152-159. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2011.02407.x
[14]	Mu CQ, Wang SQ, Liu Y, et al. Development of a facescan 3D facial reconstruction technology method for quantitative evaluation of cheilitis granulomatosa[J]. Sci Rep, 2017,7(1):1295. pmid: 28465526
[15]	Kamashita Y, Kamada Y, Kawahata N, et al. Influence of lip support on the soft-tissue profile of complete denture wearers[J]. J Oral Rehabil, 2006,33(2):102-109. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2842.2006.01575.x pmid: 16457669
[16]	Fourie Z, Damstra J, Gerrits PO, et al. Evaluation of anthropometric accuracy and reliability using different three-dimensional scanning systems[J]. Forensic Sci Int, 2011,207(1-3):127-134. doi: 10.1016/j.forsciint.2010.09.018
[17]	Metzger TE, Kula KS, Eckert GJ, et al. Orthodontic soft-tissue parameters: a comparison of cone-beam computed tomography and the 3dMD imaging system[J]. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 2013,144(5):672-681. pmid: 24182583
[18]	Desesa CR, Metzler P, Sawh-Martinez R, et al. Three-dimensional nasolabial morphologic alterations following Le Fort I[J]. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open, 2016,4(8):e848. pmid: 27622116
[19]	Mccollum AGH, Dancaster JT, Evans WG, et al. Sagittal soft-tissue changes related to the surgical correction of maxillary-deficient Class III malocclusions[J]. Seminars in Orthodontics, 2009,15(3):172-184. doi: 10.1053/j.sodo.2009.03.003
[20]	卫彦, 陈贵, 韩冰, 等. 三维照相定量评价总义齿修复前后面部软组织变化[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2014,46(1):100-103.

相关文章 15

[1]	李怡,王丽瑜,刘晓强,周倜,吕季喆,谭建国. 不同材料及厚度椅旁CAD/CAM瓷贴面的边缘特征[J]. 北京大学学报（医学版）, 2022, 54(1): 140-145.
[2]	邱淑婷,朱玉佳,王时敏,王飞龙,叶红强,赵一姣,刘云松,王勇,周永胜. 姿势微笑位口唇对称参考平面的数字化构建及初步应用验证[J]. 北京大学学报（医学版）, 2022, 54(1): 193-199.
[3]	王鹃,尉华杰,孙井德,邱立新. 预成刚性连接杆用于无牙颌种植即刻印模制取的应用评价[J]. 北京大学学报（医学版）, 2022, 54(1): 187-192.
[4]	梁峰,吴敏节,邹立东. 后牙区单牙种植修复5年后的临床修复疗效观察[J]. 北京大学学报（医学版）, 2021, 53(5): 970-976.
[5]	李新飞, 彭意吉, 余霄腾, 熊盛炜, 程嗣达, 丁光璞, 杨昆霖, 唐琦, 米悦, 吴静云, 张鹏, 谢家馨, 郝瀚, 王鹤, 邱建星, 杨建, 李学松, 周利群. 肾部分切除术前CT三维可视化评估标准的初步探究[J]. 北京大学学报（医学版）, 2021, 53(3): 613-622.
[6]	刘晓强,杨洋,周建锋,刘建彰,谭建国. 640例单牙种植术对血压和心率影响的队列研究[J]. 北京大学学报（医学版）, 2021, 53(2): 390-395.
[7]	黄新瑞,李莎,高嵩. 冷冻电镜成像中噪声的滤波方法进展[J]. 北京大学学报（医学版）, 2021, 53(2): 425-433.
[8]	周培茹, 蒋析, 华红. 口腔黏膜病患者口腔种植的时机及注意事项[J]. 北京大学学报（医学版）, 2021, 53(1): 5-8.
[9]	岳兆国,张海东,杨静文,侯建霞. 数字化评估CAD/CAM个性化基台与成品基台影响粘接剂残留的体外研究[J]. 北京大学学报（医学版）, 2021, 53(1): 69-75.
[10]	李蓬,朴牧子,胡洪成,王勇,赵一姣,申晓婧. 经嵴顶上颌窦底提升术后不植骨同期种植的影像研究[J]. 北京大学学报（医学版）, 2021, 53(1): 95-101.
[11]	徐啸翔,曹烨,赵一姣,贾璐,谢秋菲. 数字化个齿托盘制取下颌全牙列全冠预备体印模的体外评价[J]. 北京大学学报（医学版）, 2021, 53(1): 54-61.
[12]	李峥,柳玉树,王时敏,张瑞,贾璐,叶红强,胡文杰,赵文艳,刘云松,周永胜. 数字化方法复制暂时修复体牙合面形态在重度磨耗病例中的应用[J]. 北京大学学报（医学版）, 2021, 53(1): 62-68.
[13]	房硕博,杨广聚,康艳凤,孙玉春,谢秋菲. 数字化辅助确定再定位牙合垫颌位方法的探索和精度评价[J]. 北京大学学报（医学版）, 2021, 53(1): 76-82.
[14]	罗佳,张宇,崔宏燕,祝宁,沈惠丹,邸萍,林野. 锥度固位结合数字化技术在后牙连续多牙种植即刻修复中的应用[J]. 北京大学学报（医学版）, 2020, 52(5): 964-970.
[15]	魏菱,邹东,陈虎,潘韶霞,孙玉春,周永胜. 一种数字化全口义齿的临床疗效评价[J]. 北京大学学报（医学版）, 2020, 52(4): 762-770.

Metrics

Viewed

Full text

Abstract

Cited

Shared

Discussed

Rank	D/mm	X/mm	Y/mm	Z/mm
SN	1.30±0.28	-0.74±0.35	-0.64±0.38	0.61±0.44
LS	4.36±1.07	-1.18±0.75	-2.02±1.69	3.12±1.38
STO	3.54±1.16	-1.12±0.77	1.78±1.35	2.16±1.62
CPHL	3.92±0.84	-1.16±0.78	-1.95±1.51	2.68±1.05
CPHR	3.99±1.37	1.19±1.08	-1.77±1.30	2.97±1.36
CHL	3.39±0.67	-2.06±0.49	1.84±1.06	1.41±1.06
CHR	2.87±0.80	1.59±0.76	1.57±0.80	1.53±0.68

Soft tissue-to-prostheses relationship	Pearson correlation (r)	Coefficient of determination (R²)	P value for Pearson correlations
SN-F^a	0.904 3	0.817 8	<0.001^#
LS-UI^b	0.958 4	0.918 6	<0.001^#