CT能谱曲线在脊柱转移瘤和感染性病变中的鉴别诊断价值

doi:10.19723/j.issn.1671-167X.2021.01.027

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

目的: 探讨CT能谱曲线在脊柱转移瘤和感染性病变中鉴别诊断的价值。方法: 收集经手术、穿刺组织病理检查或临床治疗证实的29例脊柱转移瘤和18例脊柱感染性病变的能谱CT增强静脉期扫描图像,经后处理获得单能量图像,生成病变感兴趣区(region of interest,ROI)CT能谱曲线,计算40~140 keV不同能级水平(每10 keV)下的CT值和能谱曲线斜率,同时在传统混合能量图像的同一ROI测量CT值,对所得CT值、能谱曲线斜率及其诊断效能进行统计学分析。结果: 脊柱转移瘤和感染性病变的中位年龄分别为58岁和64岁,两组差异无统计学意义(U=171,P=0.4)。40~100 keV各能级下脊柱转移瘤的CT值分别为281.79 (143.67, 446.19) HU、199.68 (100.04, 321.49) HU、151.54 (81.47, 243.49) HU、(122.64±27.72) HU、(99.90±23.88) HU、(85.82±21.61) HU、(75.94±20.27) HU,脊柱感染性疾病的CT值分别为185.29 (164.19, 277.03) HU、138.44 (124.98, 238.56) HU、105.46 (92.94, 169.53) HU、(93.77±15.55) HU、(79.15±12.84) HU、(68.99±11.75) HU、(62.22±11.71) HU。脊柱转移瘤在同一能级的CT值显著高于脊柱感染性病变(P均<0.05),110~140 keV能量水平下的CT值差异无统计学意义(P均>0.05)。混合能量图像测量的CT值差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。脊柱转移瘤的能谱曲线斜率为2.43±0.58,高于脊柱感染性疾病的能谱曲线斜率1.50±0.40(P<0.001)。当静脉期能谱曲线斜率阈值取1.72、40 keV CT值取248.80 HU时,曲线下面积分别为0.905、0.892,灵敏度分别为88.0%、80.0%,特异度分别为76.9%、92.3%。结论: CT能谱曲线能够对鉴别脊柱转移瘤及感染性病变提供有价值的半定量信息,可以作为传统CT影像学的补充。

关键词: 脊椎肿瘤, 细菌感染, 体层摄影术, X线计算机, 诊断, 鉴别

Abstract:

Objective: To evaluate the value of CT spectral curve in differentiating spinal tumor metastasis (STM) from spinal infections (SI).Methods: In the study, 29 STM and 18 SI patients proved pathologically and clinically were examined by dual energy spectral CT (DESCT). The monochromatic images and CT spectral curves were generated automatically by GSI Viewer software. The attenuation values at different energy levels (40-140 keV, every 10 keV), the attenuation values of the lesions on the conventional polychromatic CT images and the gradients of the curve were calculated and compared between STM and SI.Results: The median age of STM and SI (58 years vs. 64 years) were not significantly different (U=171, P=0.4). The attenuation values of STM at 40-100 keV were 281.79 (143.67, 446.19) HU, 199.68 (100.04, 321.49) HU, 151.54 (81.47, 243.49) HU, (122.64±27.72) HU, (99.90±23.88) HU, (85.82±21.61) HU, and (75.94±20.27) HU, respectively, which were significantly higher than SI: 185.29 (164.19, 277.03) HU, 138.44 (124.98, 238.56) HU, 105.46 (92.94, 169.53) HU, (93.77±15.55) HU, (79.15±12.84) HU, (68.99±11.75) HU, and (62.22±11.71) HU (all P<0.05). The attenuation values at 110-140 keV and the attenuation value on the conventional CT images were not significantly different between STM and SI. The gradient of CT spectral curve of STM was 2.43±0.58, which was higher than the value of 1.50±0.40 for SI (P<0.001). Using 1.72 and 248.80 HU as the threshold value for CT spectral curve slope and the attenuation value at 40 keV, could obtain the area under receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve of 0.905 and 0.892, sensitivity of 88.0% and 80.0%, and specificity of 76.9% and 92.3%.Conclusion: CT spectral curve provides valuable semi-quantitative information for the differential diagnosis of STM and SI, which can be used as a supplement to traditional CT imaging.

Key words: Spinal neoplasms, Bacterial infections, Tomography, X-ray computed, Diagnosis, differential

中图分类号:

R738.1

袁源,郎宁,袁慧书. CT能谱曲线在脊柱转移瘤和感染性病变中的鉴别诊断价值[J]. 北京大学学报（医学版）, 2021, 53(1): 183-187.

YUAN Yuan,LANG Ning,YUAN Hui-shu. CT spectral curve in differentiating spinal tumor metastasis and infections[J]. Journal of Peking University (Health Sciences), 2021, 53(1): 183-187.

图/表 6

图1

图2

图3

表1

表2

图4

参考文献 22

[1]	Lee SH, Lee JM, Kim KW, et al. Dual-energy computed tomography to assess tumor response to hepatic radiofrequency ablation: potential diagnostic value of virtual noncontrast images and iodine maps[J]. Invest Radiol, 2011,46(2):77-84. doi: 10.1097/RLI.0b013e3181f23fcd pmid: 20856125
[2]	Lang N, Yuan H, Yu HJ, et al. Diagnosis of spinal lesions using heuristic and pharmacokinetic parameters measured by dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI[J]. Acad Radiol, 2017,24(7):867-875. doi: 10.1016/j.acra.2016.12.014 pmid: 28162875
[3]	Babic M, Simpfendorfer CS. Infections of the Spine[J]. Infect Dis Clin North Am, 2017,31(2):279-297. doi: 10.1016/j.idc.2017.01.003 pmid: 28366222
[4]	Dong Y, Zheng S, Machida H, et al. Differential diagnosis of osteoblastic metastases from bone islands in patients with lung cancer by single-source dual-energy CT: advantages of spectral CT imaging[J]. Eur J Radiol, 2015,84(5):901-907. doi: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2015.01.007 pmid: 25661696
[5]	Ko JP, Brandman S, Stember J, et al. Dual-energy computed tomography: concepts, performance, and thoracic applications[J]. J Thorac Imaging, 2012,27(1):7-22. doi: 10.1097/RTI.0b013e31823fe0e9 pmid: 22189245
[6]	Flais J, Coiffier G, Brillet E, et al. Atypical presentation of spine bone metastasis in prostate cancer mimicking Pott’s disease[J]. Clin Cases Miner Bone Metab, 2017,14(2):239-240. doi: 10.11138/ccmbm/2017.14.1.239 pmid: 29263741
[7]	袁源, 张艳, 郎宁, 等. CT能谱曲线鉴别诊断脊柱肿瘤及肿瘤样病变[J]. 中国医学影像技术, 2015,31(4):600-603.
[8]	Avrin DE, Macovski A, Zatz LE. Clinical application of Compton and photo-electric reconstruction in computed tomography: preliminary results[J]. Invest Radiol, 1978,13(3):217-222. doi: 10.1097/00004424-197805000-00007 pmid: 711396
[9]	Dilmanian FA. Computed tomography with monochromatic X rays[J]. Am J Physiol Imaging, 1992,7(3/4):175-193.
[10]	Riederer SJ, Mistretta CA. Selective iodine imaging using K-edge energies in computerized X-ray tomography[J]. Med Phys, 1977,4(6):474-481. doi: 10.1118/1.594357 pmid: 927384
[11]	Silva AC, Morse BG, Hara AK, et al. Dual-energy (spectral) CT: applications in abdominal imaging[J]. Radiographics, 2011,31(4):1031-1050. doi: 10.1148/rg.314105159 pmid: 21768237
[12]	雷立昌, 陈建宇. 能谱CT的临床应用与研究进展[J]. 中国医学影像技术, 2013,29(1):146-149.
[13]	林晓珠, 沈云, 陈克敏. CT能谱成像的基本原理与临床应用研究进展[J]. 中华放射学杂志, 2011,45(8):798-800.
[14]	张靖, 周新社. 脊柱肿瘤的诊断和外科分期研究进展[J]. 中华全科医学, 2011,9(2):277-279.
[15]	Go SW, Lee HY, Lim CH, et al. Atypical disseminated skeletal tuberculosis mimicking metastasis on PET-CT and MRI[J]. Intern Med, 2012,51(20):2961-2965. doi: 10.2169/internalmedicine.51.8347 pmid: 23064577
[16]	Mittal S, Khalid M, Sabir AB, et al. Comparison of magnetic resonance imaging findings between pathologically proven cases of atypical tubercular spine and tumour metastasis: A retrospective study in 40 patients[J]. Asian Spine J, 2016,10(4):734-743. doi: 10.4184/asj.2016.10.4.734 pmid: 27559455
[17]	Sezgin B, Atilganoglu U, Yigit O, et al. Concomitant cutaneous metastatic tuberculous abscesses and multifocal skeletal tuberculosis[J]. Indian J Dermatol, 2008,53(3):149-153. doi: 10.4103/0019-5154.43208 pmid: 19882018
[18]	Chang DS, Rafii M, McGuinness G, et al. Primary multifocal tuberculous osteomyelitis with involvement of the ribs[J]. Skeletal Radiol, 1998,27(11):641-645. doi: 10.1007/s002560050451 pmid: 9867183
[19]	Lang N, Su MY, Yu HJ, et al. Differentiation of tuberculosis and metastatic cancer in the spine using dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI[J]. Eur Spine J, 2015,24(8):1729-1737. doi: 10.1007/s00586-015-3851-z pmid: 25749725
[20]	Zheng S, Dong Y, Miao Y, et al. Differentiation of osteolytic metastases and Schmorl’s nodes in cancer patients using dual-energy CT: Advantage of spectral CT imaging[J]. Eur J Radiol, 2014,83(7):1216-1221. doi: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2014.02.003 pmid: 24820064
[21]	Gupta S, Wagner-Bartak N, Jensen CT, et al. Dual-energy CT of pancreatic adenocarcinoma: Reproducibility of primary tumor measurements and assessment of tumor conspicuity and margin sharpness[J]. Abdom Radiol (NY), 2016,41(7):1317-1324.
[22]	Ramon A, Bohm-Sigrand A, Pottecher P, et al. Role of dual-energy CT in the diagnosis and follow-up of gout: systematic analysis of the literature[J]. Clin Rheumatol, 2018,37(3):587-595. doi: 10.1007/s10067-017-3976-z pmid: 29350330

相关文章 15

[1]	陈心心, 唐哲, 乔艳春, 荣文笙. 北京市密云区4岁儿童患龋状况及其与龋活跃性检测的相关性[J]. 北京大学学报（医学版）, 2024, 56(5): 833-838.
[2]	钟华, 李原, 徐丽玲, 白明欣, 苏茵. ¹⁸F-FDG PET/CT在风湿免疫病中的应用[J]. 北京大学学报（医学版）, 2024, 56(5): 853-859.
[3]	李正芳,罗采南,武丽君,吴雪,孟新艳,陈晓梅,石亚妹,钟岩. 抗氨基甲酰化蛋白抗体在诊断类风湿关节炎中的应用价值[J]. 北京大学学报（医学版）, 2024, 56(4): 729-734.
[4]	凌晓彤,屈留洋,郑丹妮,杨静,闫雪冰,柳登高,高岩. 牙源性钙化囊肿与牙源性钙化上皮瘤的三维影像特点[J]. 北京大学学报（医学版）, 2024, 56(1): 131-137.
[5]	段登辉,WANGHom-Lay,王恩博. 可吸收胶原膜在颊侧袋形瓣引导性骨再生手术中的作用: 一项回顾性影像学队列研究[J]. 北京大学学报（医学版）, 2023, 55(6): 1097-1104.
[6]	姚海红,杨帆,唐素玫,张霞,何菁,贾园. 系统性红斑狼疮及成人Still病合并巨噬细胞活化综合征的临床特点及诊断指标[J]. 北京大学学报（医学版）, 2023, 55(6): 966-974.
[7]	熊焰,李鑫,梁丽,李东,鄢丽敏,李雪迎,邸吉廷,李挺. 甲状腺粗针穿刺活检病理诊断的准确性评估[J]. 北京大学学报（医学版）, 2023, 55(2): 234-242.
[8]	哈雪梅,姚永正,孙莉华,辛春杨,熊焰. 实性肺胎盘样变形1例及文献复习[J]. 北京大学学报（医学版）, 2023, 55(2): 357-361.
[9]	宁博涵,张青霞,杨慧,董颖. 伴间质细胞增生、玻璃样变性及索状结构的子宫内膜样腺癌1例[J]. 北京大学学报（医学版）, 2023, 55(2): 366-369.
[10]	付玉,胡鑫浓,崔圣洁,施捷. 骨性Ⅱ类高角错患者术前正畸下前牙去代偿效果及牙槽骨改建分析[J]. 北京大学学报（医学版）, 2023, 55(1): 62-69.
[11]	陈适,刘田. 重视系统性血管炎的早期识别和个体化治疗[J]. 北京大学学报（医学版）, 2022, 54(6): 1065-1067.
[12]	曹瑞洁,姚中强,焦朋清,崔立刚. 不同分类标准对中国大动脉炎的诊断效能比较[J]. 北京大学学报（医学版）, 2022, 54(6): 1128-1133.
[13]	徐朝焰,林长艺,叶达梅,吴培埕,宋明辉,刘有添,邓琼,黄雪艳,范忠晓,游雪兰. 感染性关节炎诊断分析[J]. 北京大学学报（医学版）, 2022, 54(6): 1234-1237.
[14]	郝哲,岳蜀华,周利群. 拉曼技术在泌尿系统肿瘤检测中的应用[J]. 北京大学学报（医学版）, 2022, 54(4): 779-784.
[15]	于博,赵扬玉,张喆,王永清. 妊娠合并感染性心内膜炎1例[J]. 北京大学学报（医学版）, 2022, 54(3): 578-580.

Metrics

Viewed

Full text

Abstract

Cited

Shared

Discussed

Group	Slope	40 keV	50 keV	60 keV	70 keV	80 keV
Spinal infections/HU	1.50±0.40	185.29 (164.19, 277.03)	138.44 (124.98, 238.56)	105.46 (92.94, 169.53)	93.77±15.55	79.15±12.84
Spinal metastases/HU	2.43±0.58	281.79 (143.67, 446.19)	199.68 (100.04, 321.49)	151.54 (81.47, 243.49)	122.64±27.72	99.90±23.88
t or U value	-5.790	290	276	274	-3.467	-2.910
P value	<0.001	<0.001	<0.001	0.001	0.001	0.006
Group	90 keV	100 keV	110 keV	120 keV	130 keV	140 keV
Spinal infections/HU	68.99±11.75	62.22±11.71	57.66±11.81	54.46±12.05	51.84±12.21	48.48±13.17
Spinal metastases/HU	85.82±21.61	75.94±20.27	68.86±19.61	63.79±19.33	59.58±19.65	56.65±19.43
t or U value	-2.604	-2.044	-1.882	-1.582	-1.291	-1.359
P value	0.013	0.031	0.068	0.122	0.205	0.183

Items	AUC (95%CI)	Threshold	Sensitivity	Specificity
Slope	0.905 (0.806, 1.000)	1.72	88.0%	76.9%
40 keV CT value	0.892 (0.780, 1.000)	248.80	80.0%	92.3%
50 keV CT value	0.849 (0.714, 0.985)	174.09	80.0%	84.6%
60 keV CT value	0.843 (0.710, 0.976)	132.36	76.0%	84.6%
70 keV CT value	0.809 (0.671, 0.948)	105.04	72.0%	84.6%
80 keV CT value	0.766 (0.617, 0.915)	91.67	64.0%	84.6%
90 keV CT value	0.738 (0.580, 0.897)	74.65	68.0%	76.9%
100 keV CT value	0.698 (0.532, 0.865)	68.55	64.0%	76.9%