膀胱扩大术两种不同术式的疗效及并发症比较

doi:10.19723/j.issn.1671-167X.2019.02.018

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

目的: 通过回顾膀胱扩大术患者的病历资料并进行随访,探究肠道膀胱扩大术和小肠黏膜下层(small intestinal submucosa,SIS)组织工程补片膀胱扩大术两种手术的效果及并发症情况,为进一步治疗提供依据。方法: 对北京大学人民医院自2011年11月1日至2016年12月30日期间收治的10例接受肠道膀胱扩大术或SIS组织工程补片膀胱扩大术的患者进行回顾性分析。患者的病历资料包括:临床病史、手术方法、围手术期检查结果及并发症、术后恢复情况,并进行定期随访。肠道膀胱扩大术组6例,SIS组织工程补片膀胱扩大术组4例,分析两种手术方法的效果及并发症情况。结果: 5例行乙状结肠膀胱扩大术,1例行回肠膀胱扩大术,4例行SIS组织工程补片膀胱扩大术,10例患者均完成随访。平均手术时间(302.0±66.6) min,术中平均出血(167.0±135.0) mL。SIS组织工程补片组在手术时长、肠道恢复时间、术后住院日及引流拔除时间等方面均优于肠道膀胱扩大组。两种术式手术前后国际前列腺症状评分、膀胱过度活动症评分、国际尿失禁咨询委员会尿失禁问卷表简表、O’Leary-Sant问卷表评分均有改善。术后2例行规律清洁自家间歇导尿,2例长期留置尿管。术后短期并发症包括:2例术后感染,1例轻度肠梗阻,1例代谢性酸中毒。长期并发症包括:1例输尿管吻合口狭窄,行吻合口球囊扩张术,3例反复发作的泌尿系感染,需抗生素治疗。结论: 肠道膀胱扩大术及SIS组织工程补片膀胱扩大术对于症状的改善和上尿路功能的保护均具有确切意义,无严重并发症发生。对于难治性间质性膀胱炎/膀胱疼痛综合征患者,进行SIS组织工程补片膀胱扩大术者膀胱黏膜再生良好,术后有效缓解了患者尿频、憋尿后下腹痛的症状。但本研究患者数量较少,随访时间较短,缺乏尿动力学检查结果,尚有待前瞻对照研究,纳入更大的样本量和进行更长期的随访结果以进一步验证SIS组织工程补片在膀胱扩大术中的疗效。

关键词: 膀胱疾病, 生物相容性材料, 组织工程, 泌尿外科手术, 术后并发症

Abstract:

Objective: To compare the effectiveness and complications between enterocystoplasty and small intestinal submucosa (SIS) cystoplasty through follow-ups of patients with augmentation cystoplasty in Peking University People’s Hospital, offering alternative approach for future treatment.Methods: In this study, retrospective analyses were carried out in 10 patients who underwent enterocystoplasty or SIS cystoplasty in Peking University People’s Hospital from November 2011 to December 2016. Clinical data were collected including medical history, surgical procedures, laboratory examinations and complications. And then regular follow-ups were developed. Ten patients were separated into groups of enterocystoplasty (n=6) and SIS cystoplasty (n=4), to compare their outcomes.Results: Ten patients all completed the follow-up interview. Five cases underwent augmentation cystoplasty with sigmoid colon, one with ileum and four with SIS cystoplasty successfully. The mean operative time was (302.0±66.6) min, and blood loss was (167.0±135.0) mL. The outcomes of the group of SIS cystoplasty were better in respects of the time of operation, intestinal function recovery, postoperative hospitalization duration and drainage removal. The average scores of American Urological Association symptom score (AUASS), overactive bladder syndrome score (OABSS), International Consultation on Incontinence questionnaire short form (ICI-Q-SF), and O’Leary-Sant Questionnaire were all improved in two groups. Two cases carried clean intermittent self catheterazion and two used long-term indwelling catheter. There were three patients with dilations of renal pelvises and ureters consistently or during bladder was filling preoperatively, and the situations were not going bad after the operations. The short-term complications included two cases of postoperative infection, one case of mild intestinal obstruction and one case of metabolic acidosis. The long-term complications included one case of ureteroinstestinal anastomosis strictures, three of urinary tract infection and one of long-term metabolic acidosis.Conclusion: Enterocystoplasty and SIS cystoplasty are both effective operations to improve symptoms and protect upper urinary function, with no severe complications. Cystoscopic results showed satisfactory mucosa regeneration after SIS cystoplaty in refractory interstitial cystitis/painful bladder syndrome. But the number of patients included were quite small and the follow-up period was not long enough. Prospective control study of larger number of patients with longer follow-ups are expected to find out the effectiveness and safety of SIS cystoplasty.

Key words: Urinary bladder diseases, Biocompatible materials, Tissue engineering, Urologic surgical procedures, Postoperative complications

中图分类号:

R699.5

梁晨,张维宇,胡浩,王起,方志伟,许克新. 膀胱扩大术两种不同术式的疗效及并发症比较[J]. 北京大学学报（医学版）, 2019, 51(2): 293-297.

Chen LIANG,Wei-yu ZHANG,Hao HU,Qi WANG,Zhi-wei FANG,Ke-xin XU. Comparison of effectiveness and complications between two different methods of augmentation cystoplasty[J]. Journal of Peking University(Health Sciences), 2019, 51(2): 293-297.

图/表 3

表1

两组不同术式患者术中和术后情况"

Items	Enterocystoplasty group	SIS cystoplasty group	P value
n	6	4
ASA classification, $x ?$ ±s	1.8±0.4	1.7±0.5	0.779
Duration of operation/min, $x ?$ ±s	318.0±21.4	170.0±14.1	<0.001
Intraoperative bleeding/mL, $x ?$ ±s	216.7±147.2	92.5±78.9	0.165
Intestinal function recovery/d, $x ?$ ±s	7.2±2.6	2.8±2.9	0.034
Postoperative hospitalization duration/d, $x ?$ ±s	12.2±2.2	8.0±0.8	0.008
Removal of abdominal drainage postoperatively/d, $x ?$ ±s	8.2±2.2
Removal of pelvic drainage postoperatively/d, $x ?$ ±s	8.3±1.5	5.3±2.1	0.025
Removal of suprapubic catheter postoperatively/d, $x ?$ ±s	24.2±20.5		0.132
Removal of urinary catheter postoperatively/d, $x ?$ ±s	27.5±15.1	37.5±9.6	0.278

表1

表2

肠道膀胱扩大术及生物补片膀胱扩大术患者手术前后症状评分"

Items	AUASS	OABSS	ICI-Q-SF	O’Leary-Sant score
Enterocystoplasty (n=6)
Preoperative, $x ?$ ±s	23.0±3.7	7.4±2.4	9.4±9.0
Postoperative, $x ?$ ±s	8.4±6.1	2.6±5.8	2.2±2.0
P value	0.001	0.007	0.059
SIS cystoplasty (n=4)
Preoperative, $x ?$ ±s	17.3±2.3	7.7±1.2	3.3±5.8	28.0±1.4
Postoperative, $x ?$ ±s	7.6±4.7	3.0±1.7	0.7±1.2	7.0±0.0
P value	0.017	0.009	<0.001	0.001

表2

图1

参考文献 16

[1]	Biers SM, Venn SN, Greenwell TJ . The past, present and future of augmentation cystoplasty[J]. BJU Int, 2012,109(9):1280-1293. doi: 10.1111/bju.2012.109.issue-9
[2]	Drake M, Apostolidis A, Emmanuel A , et al. Neurologicalurinary and faecal incontinence[M]. Paris: ICUD-EAU, 2013: 827-954.
[3]	Groen J, Pannek J, Castro DD , et al. Summary of European Association of Urology (EAU)guidelines on neurourology[J]. Eur Urol, 2016,69(2):324-333. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2015.07.071
[4]	Stohrer M, Goepel M, Kondo A , et al. The standardization of terminology in neurogenic lower urinary tract dysfunction: with suggestions for diagnostic procedures. International Continence Society Standardization Committee[J]. Neurourol Urodyn, 1999,18(2):139-158. doi: 10.1002/(ISSN)1520-6777
[5]	Manack A, Motsko SP, Haag-Molkenteller C , et al. Epidemiology and healthcare utilization of neurogenic bladder patients in a US claims database[J]. Neurourol Urodyn, 2011,30(3):395-401. doi: 10.1002/nau.v30.3
[6]	European Association Of Urology. Guidelines on neurogenic low urinary tract dysfunction (2012) [EB/OL]. [ 2016- 09- 25] .
[7]	Consortium for Spinal Cord Medicine. Bladder management for adults with spinal cord injury: a clinical practice guideline for health-care providers[J]. J Spinal Cord Med, 2006,29(5):527-573.
[8]	Abrams P, Cardozo L, Fall M , et al. The standardisation of terminology of lower urinary tract function: report from the Standardisation Sub-committee of the International Continence Society[J]. Am J Obstet Gynecol, 2002,187(1):116-126. doi: 10.1067/mob.2002.125704
[9]	Davis NF, Brady CM, Creagh T . Interstitial cystitis/painful bladder syndrome: epidemiology, pathophysiology and evidence-based treatment options[J]. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol, 2014,175:30-37. doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2013.12.041
[10]	Dahms SE, Piechota HJ, Dahiya R , et al. Composition and biomechanical properties of the bladder acellular matrix graft: comparative analysis in rat, pig and human[J]. Br J Urol, 1998,82(3):411-419. doi: 10.1046/j.1464-410X.1998.00748.x
[11]	Kropp BP . Small-intestinal submucosa for bladder augmentation: a review of preclinical studies[J]. World J Urol, 1998,16(4):262-267. doi: 10.1007/s003450050064
[12]	Kropp BP, Sawyer BD, Shannon HE , et al. Characterization of small intestinal submucosa regenerated canine detrusor: assessment of reinnervation, in vitro compliance and contractility[J]. J Urol, 1996,156(2 Pt 2):599-607. doi: 10.1016/S0022-5347(01)65761-6
[13]	Kropp BP, Cheng EY, Lin HK , et al. Reliable and reproducible bladder regeneration using unseeded distal small intestinal submucosa[J]. J Urol, 2004,172(4 Pt 2):1710-1713. doi: 10.1097/01.ju.0000139952.64753.27
[14]	Kropp BP, Cheng EY . Bioengineering organs using small intestinal submucosa scaffolds: in vivo tissue-engineering technology[J]. J Endourol, 2000,14(1):59-62. doi: 10.1089/end.2000.14.59
[15]	Liao L, Zhang F, Chen G . Midterm outcomes of protection for upper urinary tract function by augmentation enterocystoplasty in patients with neurogenic bladder[J]. Int Urol Nephrol, 2014,46(11):2117-2125. doi: 10.1007/s11255-014-0782-2
[16]	Lam Van Ba O, Aharony S, Loutochin O , et al. Bladder tissue engineering: a literature review[J]. Adv Drug Deliv Rev, 2015, 82-83:31-37. doi: 10.1016/j.addr.2014.11.013

相关文章 15

[1]	王明瑞,刘军,熊六林,于路平,胡浩,许克新,徐涛. 经皮微通道-微电子肾镜-微超声探针碎石术治疗1.5~2.5 cm肾结石的疗效和安全性[J]. 北京大学学报（医学版）, 2024, 56(4): 605-609.
[2]	陈晓颖,张一,李雨柯,唐琳,刘玉华. 不同种类聚合物对猪小肠黏膜下层支架仿生矿化的影响[J]. 北京大学学报（医学版）, 2024, 56(1): 17-24.
[3]	许素环,王蓓蓓,庞秋颖,钟丽君,丁炎明,黄燕波,车新艳. 等体温膀胱冲洗对经尿道前列腺电切术患者干预效果的meta分析[J]. 北京大学学报（医学版）, 2023, 55(4): 676-683.
[4]	李雨柯,王梅,唐琳,刘玉华,陈晓颖. 不同pH值对脱细胞小肠黏膜下层海绵支架螯合锶离子的影响[J]. 北京大学学报（医学版）, 2023, 55(1): 44-51.
[5]	李辉,高阳旭,王书磊,姚红新. 恶性肿瘤患儿完全植入式静脉输液港手术并发症[J]. 北京大学学报（医学版）, 2022, 54(6): 1167-1171.
[6]	李伟浩,李伟,张学民,李清乐,焦洋,张韬,蒋京军,张小明. 去分支杂交手术和传统手术治疗胸腹主动脉瘤的结果比较[J]. 北京大学学报（医学版）, 2022, 54(1): 177-181.
[7]	敖英芳,曹宸喜. 解析与重塑软骨组织修复再生微环境[J]. 北京大学学报（医学版）, 2021, 53(5): 819-822.
[8]	耿志宇,高为华,王东信. 全身麻醉气管插管患者术后声带运动不良的临床结局[J]. 北京大学学报（医学版）, 2021, 53(2): 337-340.
[9]	黄丽东,宫玮玉,董艳梅. 生物活性玻璃对人脐静脉血管内皮细胞增殖及成血管的作用[J]. 北京大学学报（医学版）, 2021, 53(2): 371-377.
[10]	王梅, 李博文, 王思雯, 刘玉华. 猪小肠黏膜下层海绵的制备及促成骨作用[J]. 北京大学学报（医学版）, 2020, 52(5): 952-958.
[11]	董文敏,王明瑞,胡浩,王起,许克新,徐涛. Allium覆膜金属输尿管支架长期留置治疗输尿管-回肠吻合口狭窄的初期临床经验及随访结果[J]. 北京大学学报（医学版）, 2020, 52(4): 637-641.
[12]	高健,胡立宝,陈尘,郅新,徐涛. 经皮肾镜去石术后出血的介入治疗[J]. 北京大学学报（医学版）, 2020, 52(4): 667-671.
[13]	吴唯伊,李博文,刘玉华,王新知. 复层猪小肠黏膜下层可吸收膜的降解性能[J]. 北京大学学报（医学版）, 2020, 52(3): 564-569.
[14]	马凯,曲星珂,许清泉,熊六林,叶雄俊,安立哲,陈伟男,黄晓波. 肾移植术后移植肾输尿管膀胱吻合口狭窄的腔内治疗:13例报道[J]. 北京大学学报（医学版）, 2019, 51(6): 1155-1158.
[15]	张维宇,夏秋翔,胡浩,陈京文,孙屹然,许克新,张晓鹏. 门诊女性下尿路症状患者尿动力学检查结果分析及逼尿肌无力患者的随访[J]. 北京大学学报（医学版）, 2019, 51(5): 856-862.

Metrics

Viewed

Full text

Abstract

Cited

Shared

Discussed