北京大学学报(医学版) ›› 2016, Vol. 48 ›› Issue (1): 126-132. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1671-167X.2016.01.023

• 论著 • 上一篇    下一篇

不同测量方法评价磨牙拔牙位点保存术后牙槽骨的变化

赵丽萍, 詹雅琳, 胡文杰△, 徐涛, 危伊萍, 甄敏, 王翠   

  1. (北京大学口腔医学院·口腔医院牙周科,北京100081)
  • 出版日期:2016-02-18 发布日期:2016-02-18
  • 通讯作者: 胡文杰 E-mail:huwenjie@pkuss.bjmu.edu.cn
  • 基金资助:

    首都卫生发展科研专项基金(2011-4025-04)和教育部留学回国人员科研启动基金(2012-45)资助

Evaluation with different measuring methods for the alveolar bone change of ridge preservation in molar sites

ZHAO Li-ping, ZHAN Ya-lin, HU Wen-jie△, XU Tao, WEI Yi-ping, ZHEN Min, WANG Cui   

  1. (Department of Periodontology, Peking University School and Hospital of Stomatology, Beijing 100081, China)
  • Online:2016-02-18 Published:2016-02-18
  • Contact: HU Wen-jie E-mail:huwenjie@pkuss.bjmu.edu.cn
  • Supported by:

    Supported by the Capital Foundation for Medical Research and Development (2011-4025-04), and the Scientific Research Staring Foundation for the Returned Overseas Chinese Scholars, Ministry of Education of China (2012-45)

摘要:

目的:采用临床直接测量、平行投照根尖片和锥形束CT(cone-beam computed tomography,CBCT)评价存在骨缺损的磨牙拔牙同期位点保存6个月后牙槽骨的变化,并分析不同方法的测量效果。方法:纳入20名患者共23颗因牙周病变拔除的磨牙,牙齿拔除后应用去骨蛋白牛骨基质(deproteinized boving bone mineral,DBBM,Bio-Oss)和可吸收膜(bioabsorbable collagen membrane, Bio-Gide)进行拔牙位点保存术,术中临床直接测量,术后即刻及术后6个月拍摄平行投照根尖片和CBCT,通过上述3种方法测量分析术后6个月牙槽骨高度和宽度的变化并比较测量效果的异同。结果:比较23个拔牙位点的牙槽骨高度在拔牙位点中央、远中中央、颊侧远中3个观察点的术中临床测量与CBCT测量的结果,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05),其他观察点的高度及宽度测量结果差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。术后6个月接受翻瓣再进入实施种植的10名患者中,拔牙位点中央相应观察点的牙槽骨高度显著增加,临床直接测量和CBCT测量分别增加(6.15±1.73) mm和(6.59±2.53) mm,牙槽骨宽度测量值分别为(8.45±1.18) mm和(8.52±1.27) mm,两种方法测量结果差异无统计学意义(P>0.05);应用平行投照根尖片观察术前和术后6个月拔牙位点中央的牙槽骨高度变化为增加(5.84±4.28) mm,测量数值与另两种方法接近。结论:存在骨缺损的磨牙应用BioOss与BioGide进行拔牙位点保存后,临床直接测量和CBCT测量两种方法对牙槽嵴顶骨高度和宽度变化的评价基本一致。

关键词: 位点保存, 磨牙, 牙周炎, 锥束计算机体层摄影术

Abstract:

Objective:To investigate the changes of the vertical height and width of the alveolar bone six months after the alveolar ridge preservation in periodontal compromised molar sites of severe alveolar bone defects with clinical direct measurement, parallel periapical radiographs, and cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT), and to analyze the effect of the three different methods of measurement. Methods: In this study, 20 subjects requiring tooth extraction on account of periodontal disease with a total of 23 extracted molars were enrolled. Extractions were performed atraumatically and patients were received alveolar ridge preservation procedure with Bio-Oss-and Bio-Gide-Clinical direct measurements were taken after tooth extraction and during the implant surgery 6 months later, CBCT scans and parallel periapical radiographs were taken immediately after ridge preservation and 6 months later. The changes of alveolar ridge width and vertical height after six months were measured and analyzed through the above-mentioned three methods and the similarities and differences of the measured effect were compared. Results: There were no significant difference of alveolar vertical height in the center of the extraction sites, the center of distal aspect, and distobuccal aspect between the clinical direct measurements and the CBCT measurements (P>0.05), alveolar vertical height in other points and alveolar width measurements were statically significant (P<0.05). After 6 months, 10 sites of 10 subjects were received a flap and reentered to perform dental implants surgery. The vertical height in the center of alveolar increased significantly and the changes of alveolar vertical height of clinical direct and CBCT measurement were (6.15±1.73) mm and (6.59±2.53) mm, respectively. The measurements of the width of the alveolar bone were (8.45±1.18) mm and (8.52±1.27) mm, respectively. The measurements of the two methods were not statistically significant (P>0.05). The change of the alveolar height in the center of the extraction socket after six months measured by parallel periapical was (5.84±4.28) mm, which was closed to the clinical direct measurement and the CBCT measurement. Conclusion: Clinical direct measurement and CBCT measurement were largely consistent in the evaluation of the alveolar bone height and width after the alveolar ridge preservation using deproteinized boving bone mineral (DBBM, Bio-OssR) and bioabsorbable collagen membrane (Bio-GideR) in periodontal compromised molar sites of severe bone defects.

Key words: Alveolar ridge preservation, Molar, Periodontitis, Cone-beam computed tomography

中图分类号: 

  • R782.13
[1] 胡玉如,刘娟,李文静,赵亦兵,李启强,路瑞芳,孟焕新. Ⅲ期或Ⅳ期牙周炎患者龈沟液中有机酸浓度与牙周炎的关系[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2024, 56(2): 332-337.
[2] 凌晓彤,屈留洋,郑丹妮,杨静,闫雪冰,柳登高,高岩. 牙源性钙化囊肿与牙源性钙化上皮瘤的三维影像特点[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2024, 56(1): 131-137.
[3] 陈晨,梁宇红. 复杂根管上颌磨牙的根管治疗3例[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2024, 56(1): 190-195.
[4] 张晗,秦亦瑄,韦帝远,韩劼. 牙周炎患者种植修复维护治疗依从性的影响因素[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2024, 56(1): 39-44.
[5] 殳畅,韩烨,孙雨哲,杨再目,侯建霞. Ⅲ期牙周炎患者牙周基础治疗前后炎症性贫血相关指标的变化[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2024, 56(1): 45-50.
[6] 段登辉,WANGHom-Lay,王恩博. 可吸收胶原膜在颊侧袋形瓣引导性骨再生手术中的作用: 一项回顾性影像学队列研究[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2023, 55(6): 1097-1104.
[7] 裴喜燕,阳雯,欧阳翔英,孙凤. 牙周内窥镜下根面清创与牙周翻瓣术疗效比较[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2023, 55(4): 716-720.
[8] 雷玥,杨颖婷,雷海华. 异位萌出诱导矫治器在第一恒磨牙异位萌出治疗中的应用[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2023, 55(4): 766-封三.
[9] 温静,欧阳翔英,裴喜燕,邱善湧,刘健如,刘文逸,曹采方. 重度牙周炎患者4年自然进展失牙的多因素分析[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2023, 55(1): 70-77.
[10] 田靖,秦满,陈洁,夏斌. 失活剂烧伤致乳磨牙早失及恒牙胚丧失2例[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2022, 54(2): 381-385.
[11] 陈震,谷宝鑫,汤玉芳,闫子玉,倪方端,崔念晖. 应用Delphi法构建下颌阻生第三磨牙拔除难度评分量表[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2022, 54(1): 100-104.
[12] 朱小玲,李文静,王宪娥,宋文莉,徐莉,张立,冯向辉,路瑞芳,释栋,孟焕新. 细胞色素B-245α链及胆固醇酯转运蛋白基因多态性与广泛型侵袭性牙周炎易感性的关系[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2022, 54(1): 18-22.
[13] 徐欣然,霍芃呈,和璐,孟焕新,朱筠轩,靳东思奇. 伴与不伴糖尿病的牙周炎患者牙周基础治疗的疗效比较及其与白细胞水平的相关分析[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2022, 54(1): 48-53.
[14] 杨刚,胡文杰,曹洁,柳登高. 牙周健康的上颌前牙唇侧嵴顶上牙龈的三维形态分析[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2021, 53(5): 990-994.
[15] 郜洪宇,孟焕新,侯建霞,黄宝鑫,李玮. 钙结合蛋白在健康牙周组织和实验性牙周炎组织的表达分布[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2021, 53(4): 744-749.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!