北京大学学报(医学版) ›› 2016, Vol. 48 ›› Issue (1): 126-132. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1671-167X.2016.01.023

• 论著 • 上一篇    下一篇

不同测量方法评价磨牙拔牙位点保存术后牙槽骨的变化

赵丽萍, 詹雅琳, 胡文杰△, 徐涛, 危伊萍, 甄敏, 王翠   

  1. (北京大学口腔医学院·口腔医院牙周科,北京100081)
  • 出版日期:2016-02-18 发布日期:2016-02-18
  • 通讯作者: 胡文杰 E-mail:huwenjie@pkuss.bjmu.edu.cn
  • 基金资助:

    首都卫生发展科研专项基金(2011-4025-04)和教育部留学回国人员科研启动基金(2012-45)资助

Evaluation with different measuring methods for the alveolar bone change of ridge preservation in molar sites

ZHAO Li-ping, ZHAN Ya-lin, HU Wen-jie△, XU Tao, WEI Yi-ping, ZHEN Min, WANG Cui   

  1. (Department of Periodontology, Peking University School and Hospital of Stomatology, Beijing 100081, China)
  • Online:2016-02-18 Published:2016-02-18
  • Contact: HU Wen-jie E-mail:huwenjie@pkuss.bjmu.edu.cn
  • Supported by:

    Supported by the Capital Foundation for Medical Research and Development (2011-4025-04), and the Scientific Research Staring Foundation for the Returned Overseas Chinese Scholars, Ministry of Education of China (2012-45)

摘要:

目的:采用临床直接测量、平行投照根尖片和锥形束CT(cone-beam computed tomography,CBCT)评价存在骨缺损的磨牙拔牙同期位点保存6个月后牙槽骨的变化,并分析不同方法的测量效果。方法:纳入20名患者共23颗因牙周病变拔除的磨牙,牙齿拔除后应用去骨蛋白牛骨基质(deproteinized boving bone mineral,DBBM,Bio-Oss)和可吸收膜(bioabsorbable collagen membrane, Bio-Gide)进行拔牙位点保存术,术中临床直接测量,术后即刻及术后6个月拍摄平行投照根尖片和CBCT,通过上述3种方法测量分析术后6个月牙槽骨高度和宽度的变化并比较测量效果的异同。结果:比较23个拔牙位点的牙槽骨高度在拔牙位点中央、远中中央、颊侧远中3个观察点的术中临床测量与CBCT测量的结果,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05),其他观察点的高度及宽度测量结果差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。术后6个月接受翻瓣再进入实施种植的10名患者中,拔牙位点中央相应观察点的牙槽骨高度显著增加,临床直接测量和CBCT测量分别增加(6.15±1.73) mm和(6.59±2.53) mm,牙槽骨宽度测量值分别为(8.45±1.18) mm和(8.52±1.27) mm,两种方法测量结果差异无统计学意义(P>0.05);应用平行投照根尖片观察术前和术后6个月拔牙位点中央的牙槽骨高度变化为增加(5.84±4.28) mm,测量数值与另两种方法接近。结论:存在骨缺损的磨牙应用BioOss与BioGide进行拔牙位点保存后,临床直接测量和CBCT测量两种方法对牙槽嵴顶骨高度和宽度变化的评价基本一致。

关键词: 位点保存, 磨牙, 牙周炎, 锥束计算机体层摄影术

Abstract:

Objective:To investigate the changes of the vertical height and width of the alveolar bone six months after the alveolar ridge preservation in periodontal compromised molar sites of severe alveolar bone defects with clinical direct measurement, parallel periapical radiographs, and cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT), and to analyze the effect of the three different methods of measurement. Methods: In this study, 20 subjects requiring tooth extraction on account of periodontal disease with a total of 23 extracted molars were enrolled. Extractions were performed atraumatically and patients were received alveolar ridge preservation procedure with Bio-Oss-and Bio-Gide-Clinical direct measurements were taken after tooth extraction and during the implant surgery 6 months later, CBCT scans and parallel periapical radiographs were taken immediately after ridge preservation and 6 months later. The changes of alveolar ridge width and vertical height after six months were measured and analyzed through the above-mentioned three methods and the similarities and differences of the measured effect were compared. Results: There were no significant difference of alveolar vertical height in the center of the extraction sites, the center of distal aspect, and distobuccal aspect between the clinical direct measurements and the CBCT measurements (P>0.05), alveolar vertical height in other points and alveolar width measurements were statically significant (P<0.05). After 6 months, 10 sites of 10 subjects were received a flap and reentered to perform dental implants surgery. The vertical height in the center of alveolar increased significantly and the changes of alveolar vertical height of clinical direct and CBCT measurement were (6.15±1.73) mm and (6.59±2.53) mm, respectively. The measurements of the width of the alveolar bone were (8.45±1.18) mm and (8.52±1.27) mm, respectively. The measurements of the two methods were not statistically significant (P>0.05). The change of the alveolar height in the center of the extraction socket after six months measured by parallel periapical was (5.84±4.28) mm, which was closed to the clinical direct measurement and the CBCT measurement. Conclusion: Clinical direct measurement and CBCT measurement were largely consistent in the evaluation of the alveolar bone height and width after the alveolar ridge preservation using deproteinized boving bone mineral (DBBM, Bio-OssR) and bioabsorbable collagen membrane (Bio-GideR) in periodontal compromised molar sites of severe bone defects.

Key words: Alveolar ridge preservation, Molar, Periodontitis, Cone-beam computed tomography

中图分类号: 

  • R782.13
[1] 王昕莹, 程雪原, 张孟钧, 李菲, 段晋瑜, 乔静. 浓缩生长因子联合引导性组织再生术治疗下颌磨牙根分叉病变的疗效[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2026, 58(2): 372-379.
[2] 王月, 梁宇红. 繁茂型牙骨质-骨结构不良1例[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2026, 58(1): 220-224.
[3] 潘莲菲, 李文静, 王瑞洋, 焦剑, 曹战强, 高丽, 释栋. 口服抗生素辅助牙周机械治疗对重度牙周炎的短期疗效及影响因素[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2026, 58(1): 30-36.
[4] 张斯巧, 刘建, 徐涛, 胡文杰, 张浩筠, 危伊萍. 异种骨与人工合成骨在磨牙拔牙同期微翻瓣牙槽嵴保存术中的临床效果比较[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2026, 58(1): 74-83.
[5] 马保金, 李建华, 桑元华, 于洋, 仇吉川, 邵金龙, 李凯, 刘世岳, 杜密, 商玲玲, 葛少华. 基于微环境和干细胞调控的牙周组织再生关键技术的建立与应用[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2025, 57(5): 841-846.
[6] 曹沛, 栾庆先. 牙周炎与全身系统性疾病的思考与探索[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2025, 57(5): 852-858.
[7] 包振英, 王雅杰. 炎症指标和细胞因子联合检测在慢性牙周炎中的应用[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2025, 57(4): 772-778.
[8] 王菲, 张馨月, 刘木清, 王恩博, 段登辉. 顺牙长轴拔牙法在下颌近中与水平智齿拔除术中的应用及三维有限元分析[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2025, 57(1): 106-112.
[9] 石宇彤, 危伊萍, 胡文杰, 徐涛, 张浩筠. 罹患重度牙周炎下颌磨牙拔牙微翻瓣牙槽嵴保存效果评价[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2025, 57(1): 33-41.
[10] 王昕莹, 程雪原, 张勇, 李菲, 段晋瑜, 乔静. 浓缩生长因子与自固化磷酸钙人工骨联合治疗牙周骨下袋缺损的疗效:临床和影像学评价[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2025, 57(1): 42-50.
[11] 李敬谦, 朱子璐, 焦剑, 施捷. 隐形矫治重度牙周炎患者前牙区病理性移位患牙的临床疗效[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2025, 57(1): 51-56.
[12] 胡玉如,刘娟,李文静,赵亦兵,李启强,路瑞芳,孟焕新. Ⅲ期或Ⅳ期牙周炎患者龈沟液中有机酸浓度与牙周炎的关系[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2024, 56(2): 332-337.
[13] 凌晓彤,屈留洋,郑丹妮,杨静,闫雪冰,柳登高,高岩. 牙源性钙化囊肿与牙源性钙化上皮瘤的三维影像特点[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2024, 56(1): 131-137.
[14] 陈晨,梁宇红. 复杂根管上颌磨牙的根管治疗3例[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2024, 56(1): 190-195.
[15] 张晗,秦亦瑄,韦帝远,韩劼. 牙周炎患者种植修复维护治疗依从性的影响因素[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2024, 56(1): 39-44.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!