北京大学学报(医学版) ›› 2018, Vol. 50 ›› Issue (4): 694-699. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1671-167X.2018.04.021

• 论著 • 上一篇    下一篇

上前牙即刻种植即刻修复负载3年后软、硬组织变化的临床观察

吴敏节△,邹立东,梁峰   

  1. (北京大学口腔医学院·口腔医院,第二门诊部国家口腔疾病临床医学研究中心口腔数字化医疗技术和材料国家工程实验室口腔数字医学北京市重点实验室, 北京100101)
  • 出版日期:2018-08-18 发布日期:2018-08-18
  • 通讯作者: 吴敏节 E-mail:dentwu@sohu.com

Clinical observation on soft and hard tissue changes of immediate implantation and immediate reconstruction in anterior region after loading 3 years

WU Min-jie△, ZOU Li-dong, LIANG Feng   

  1. (Department of Second Clinical Division, Peking University School and Hospital of Stomatology & National Clinical Research Center for Oral Diseases & National Engineering Laboratory for Digital and Material Technology of Stomatology & Beijing Key Laboratory of Digital Stomatology, Beijing 100101, China)
  • Online:2018-08-18 Published:2018-08-18
  • Contact: WU Min-jie E-mail:dentwu@sohu.com

摘要:  目的:观察上前牙区即刻种植即刻修复负载3年后软、硬组织的临床变化情况。方法:选择2008年10月至2012年10月期间就诊于北京大学口腔医院第二门诊部并拟在前牙区进行种植治疗的健康患者。观察即刻种植即刻修复及常规种植修复这两种方式的患者在修复即刻及3年后近远中牙龈乳头、唇侧龈缘水平高度以及种植体近远中侧骨水平的变化。结果:即刻种植组和常规种植组分别完成20例和24例,植入种植体分别为22颗和29颗。两组病例在永久修复时种植体稳定系数(implant stability quotient, ISQ)分别为76.32±3.20和76.93±3.36 (P>0.05)。即刻种植组和常规种植组在修复3年后近中龈乳头高度变化分别为(0.34±0.54) mm和(0.05±0.39) mm (P=0.07),远中龈乳头高度变化分别为(0.43±0.42) mm和(0.36±0.48) mm (P=0.13),唇侧龈缘水平变化分别为(0.70±0.40) mm和(0.62±0.34) mm (P=0.23),种植体骨吸收量在近中侧分别为(1.02±0.50) mm和(0.88±0.46) mm (P=0.53),远中侧分别为(1.05±0.34) mm和(0.95±0.47) mm (P=0.21),两组间差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05),但在修复即刻,两组间牙龈乳头指数的分布情况不论是近中还是远中差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论:上前牙即刻种植即刻修复3年后的软、硬组织的变化与常规种植修复基本相当,但前者在缩短疗程、获得理想的种植体周围软组织形态方面要优于后者。

关键词: 牙种植, 骨内, 即刻负荷牙种植体, 牙龈, 美学, 牙科

Abstract: Objective: To observe the change of soft and hard tissue in dental immediate implantation and immediate reconstruction in anterior region after loading 3 years. Methods: Patients with single anterior tooth loss in the Department of Second Dental Center, Peking University School and Hospital of Stomatology from October 2008 to October 2012 were enrolled. The gingival papilla height, labial gingival margin level and peri-implant bone level were measured immediately after the permanent restoration and 3 years later. Results: In the study, 20 patients were treated by immediate implantation and immediate reconstruction for 22 implants; 24 patients were treated by delayed implant for 29 implants. Implant stability quotient (ISQ) value of the two groups showed no significant difference before permanent restoration (P>0.05). In all the cases after loading 3 years, the average mesial gingival papilla height in implant area of the immediate group and delayed group changed by (0.34±0.54) mm and (0.05±0.39) mm respectively (P=0.07), the distal gingival papilla height changed by (0.43±0.42) mm and (0.36±0.48) mm respectively (P=0.13), while the labial gingival margin level shrinkages were (0.70±0.40) mm and (0.62±0.34) mm respectively (P=0.23). Periimplant bone losses in the mesial side were (1.02±0.50) mm and (0.88±0.46) mm respectively (P=0.53), while those in the distal side were (1.05±0.34) mm and (0.95±0.47) mm respectively (P=0.21). All these indicators showed no significant difference between the two groups (P>0.05); When the permanent prostheses delivered, the distributions of the gingival papilla index were different between the two groups whether in the mesial side or in the distal side (P<0.05). Conclusion: The changes of the soft and hard tissue of the immediate implantation and immediate reconstruction in anterior region after loading 3 years were basically equivalent to the conventional implant restoration. But, the former was obviously better than the latter in reducing the duration of treatment and in getting the ideal dental papilla aesthetic effect.

Key words: Dental implantation, endosseous, Immediate dental implant loading, Gingiva, Esthetics, dental

中图分类号: 

  • R782.12
[1] 吕梁,张铭津,温奧楠,赵一姣,王勇,李晶,杨庚辰,柳大为. 应用三维软组织空间线角模板法评价颏部对称性[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2024, 56(1): 106-110.
[2] 王聪伟,高敏,于尧,章文博,彭歆. 游离腓骨瓣修复下颌骨缺损术后义齿修复的临床分析[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2024, 56(1): 66-73.
[3] 李穗,马雯洁,王时敏,丁茜,孙瑶,张磊. 上前牙种植单冠修复体切导的数字化设计正确度[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2024, 56(1): 81-87.
[4] 刘晓强,周寅. 牙种植同期植骨术围术期高血压的相关危险因素[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2024, 56(1): 93-98.
[5] 卢汉,张建运,杨榕,徐乐,李庆祥,郭玉兴,郭传瑸. 下颌牙龈鳞状细胞癌患者预后的影响因素[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2023, 55(4): 702-707.
[6] 丁茜,李文锦,孙丰博,谷景华,林元华,张磊. 表面处理对氧化钇和氧化镁稳定的氧化锆种植体晶相及断裂强度的影响[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2023, 55(4): 721-728.
[7] 欧蒙恩,丁云,唐卫峰,周永胜. 基台边缘-牙冠的平台转移结构中粘接剂流动的三维有限元分析[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2023, 55(3): 548-552.
[8] 孙菲,刘建,李思琪,危伊萍,胡文杰,王翠. 种植体黏膜下微生物在健康种植体和种植体周炎中的构成与差异:一项横断面研究[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2023, 55(1): 30-37.
[9] 刘云松,周倜,叶红强. 前牙美学修复的整体策略及细节剖析[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2022, 54(1): 1-6.
[10] 孙菲,李思琪,危伊萍,钟金晟,王翠,胡文杰. 种植体周病非手术治疗中联合应用甘氨酸粉喷砂的临床效果评价[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2022, 54(1): 119-125.
[11] 李怡,王丽瑜,刘晓强,周倜,吕季喆,谭建国. 不同材料及厚度椅旁CAD/CAM瓷贴面的边缘特征[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2022, 54(1): 140-145.
[12] 王鹃,尉华杰,孙井德,邱立新. 预成刚性连接杆用于无牙颌种植即刻印模制取的应用评价[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2022, 54(1): 187-192.
[13] 邱淑婷,朱玉佳,王时敏,王飞龙,叶红强,赵一姣,刘云松,王勇,周永胜. 姿势微笑位口唇对称参考平面的数字化构建及初步应用验证[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2022, 54(1): 193-199.
[14] 袁临天,马利沙,刘润园,齐伟,张栌丹,王贵燕,王宇光. 计算机模拟亚甲基蓝与牙龈卟啉单胞菌部分蛋白的分子对接[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2022, 54(1): 23-30.
[15] 徐欣然,霍芃呈,和璐,孟焕新,朱筠轩,靳东思奇. 伴与不伴糖尿病的牙周炎患者牙周基础治疗的疗效比较及其与白细胞水平的相关分析[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2022, 54(1): 48-53.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!