北京大学学报(医学版) ›› 2016, Vol. 48 ›› Issue (1): 94-100. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1671-167X.2016.01.017

• 论著 • 上一篇    下一篇

后牙种植体支持单冠牙合面高度的三维有限元力学分析

赵旭1, 张磊1△, 孙健2, 杨振宇2,谢秋菲1   

  1. (1. 北京大学口腔医学院·口腔医院修复科,北京100081;2. 北京航空航天大学航空科学与工程学院固体力学研究所,北京100191)
  • 出版日期:2016-02-18 发布日期:2016-02-18
  • 通讯作者: 张磊 E-mail:drzhanglei@yeah.net

Three-dimensional finite element analysis of influence of occlusal surface height on stress distribution around posterior implant-supported single crown

ZHAO Xu1, ZHANG Lei1△, SUN Jian2, YANG Zhen-yu2, XIE Qiu-fei1   

  1. (1. Department of Prosthodontics, Peking University School and Hospital of Stomatology, Beijing 100081, China; 2. Institute of Solid Mechanics,School of Aeronautics Sciences and Engineering, Beihang University, Beijing 100191, China)
  • Online:2016-02-18 Published:2016-02-18
  • Contact: ZHANG Lei E-mail:drzhanglei@yeah.net

摘要:

目的:评价下颌后牙区种植支持单冠(种植单冠)的牙合面高度对种植体周围骨内应力分布的影响。方法:建立右下第二前磨牙种植单冠、近远中天然邻牙、牙周膜、牙槽骨、加载用刚体及模拟杏仁食物的三维有限元模型。采用国际牙科联合会系统(Federation Dentaire International system, FDI)命名法,以44、45、46分别代表右下第一前磨牙、右下第二前磨牙及右下第一磨牙。分别进行单牙最大牙合力(44加载280 N,45加载360 N,46加载480 N)及平均牙合力(44加载140 N,45加载180 N,46加载240 N)独立加载、联合加载(各牙位最大牙合力之和转换为3.7 MPa,均布载荷加载于刚体上表面,刚体与各牙冠部接触点确定关系)及模拟杏仁的食物加载(各牙位平均牙合力之和转换为1.67 MPa,均布载荷加载于模拟杏仁的食物上表面,食物与各牙冠部接触点确定关系), 研究种植单冠3种不同牙合面高度(正常高度、低牙合 15 μm及低牙合 30 μm)对于种植体周围骨内应力分布的影响。结果:在最大牙合力独立加载时,46、45、44周围骨组织内Von Mises应力峰值分别为82.57 MPa、45.26 MPa、27.79 MPa;在平均牙合力独立加载时,Von Mises应力峰值分别为41.28 MPa、22.63 MPa、13.89 MPa。在联合加载时,种植单冠低牙合 30 μm与正常高度组相比,45应力峰值降幅为4.6 MPa,降低了0.84%;46应力峰值增幅为7.52 MPa,增加了20.04%;44应力峰值降幅为1.8 MPa,降低了5.84%。在模拟杏仁食物加载时,种植单冠低牙合 30 μm与正常高度组相比,45应力峰值降幅为0.34 MPa,降低了1.62%;46处应力峰值增幅为1.11 MPa,增加了2.66%;44处应力峰值增幅为0.06 MPa,增加了0.54%。结论:在本研究条件下,降低种植单冠牙合面高度30 μm范围内,种植体周围骨内应力峰值没有明显的变化。

关键词: 种植体支持单冠, 牙合面高度, 加载方式, 有限元分析, 应力

Abstract:

Objective:To evaluate the effect of the occlusal surface height of a mandibular posterior implant-supported single crown on stress in bone tissues. Methods: Three-dimensional finite element models of the implant-supported single crown replacing the missing right lower second premolar, mesial and distal natural teeth, periodontal membrane, alveolar bone, loaded rigid body and analog food of almond were established. Using the Federation Dentaire International (FDI) system, the first premolar, the second premolar and the first molar were represented with 44, 45, 46. Three occlusal surface heights of the crown were studied: (1) normal height; (2) 15 μm reduction in height; (3) 30 μm reduction in height. The models were loaded by independent loading with maximal occlusal force(44 by 280 N, 45 by 360 N, and 46 by 480 N)and average occlusal force(44 by 140 N, 45 by 180 N, and 46 by 240 N)on the single crown; combined loading (maximal occlusal force transformed into uniform load of 3.7 MPa on top of rigid body, in contact with points on the occlusal surface), and analog almondlike food loading (average occlusal force transformed into uniform load of 1.67 MPa in simulated food chewing, in contact with points on the occlusal surface). Results: For maximal biting force under independent loading, Von Mises stress peak values in bone tissues around 44, 45, and 46 were 82.57 MPa, 45.26 MPa and 27.79 MPa; For average biting force, peak values were 41.28 MPa, 22.63 MPa and 13.89 MPa. Under combined loading, compared with the normal occlusal surface height group, Von Mises stress peak values decreased 4.6 MPa, by 0.84%; increased 7.52 MPa, by 20.04%, and decreased 1.8 MPa, by 5.84%, for 45, 46, and 44 in the 30 μm infra-occlusion group, respectively. Under food loading, Von Mises stress peak values decreased 0.34 MPa, by 1.62%; increased 1.11 MPa, by 2.66%; and increased 0.06 MPa, by 0.54%, and for 45, 46, and 44 in the 30 μm infra-occlusion group, respectively. Conclusion:Within the limitation of this study, within 30 μm reduction of the occlusal surface height of implantsupported single crown, no significant difference of the peak values was observed.

Key words: Implant-supported single crown, Occlusal surface height, Loading method, Finite element analysis, Stress

中图分类号: 

  • R781.33
[1] 欧蒙恩,丁云,唐卫峰,周永胜. 基台边缘-牙冠的平台转移结构中粘接剂流动的三维有限元分析[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2023, 55(3): 548-552.
[2] 马珂楠,陈虎,沈妍汝,周永胜,王勇,孙玉春. 选择性激光熔化打印可摘局部义齿圆环形卡环固位力的有限元分析[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2022, 54(1): 105-112.
[3] 任爽,时会娟,张家豪,刘振龙,邵嘉艺,朱敬先,胡晓青,黄红拾,敖英芳. 前交叉韧带重建术后移植物应力的有限元分析[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2021, 53(5): 865-870.
[4] 周伟,安金刚,荣起国,张益. 下颌骨颏部骨折联合双侧髁突囊内骨折致伤机制的三维有限元分析[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2021, 53(5): 983-989.
[5] 姜又升,冯琳,高学军. 垫底材料弹性模量对髓腔固位冠修复后上颌前磨牙应力分布的影响[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2021, 53(4): 764-769.
[6] 林春平,卢松鹤,朱浚鑫,胡洪成,岳兆国,唐志辉. 个性化根形种植体的螺纹形态对周围牙槽骨应力分布影响的三维有限元分析[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2019, 51(6): 1130-1137.
[7] 付宏宇,王芳芳,侯晓玫. 控制记忆合金丝镍钛根管锉弯曲性能有限元分析模型的构建及力学分析[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2019, 51(1): 131-135.
[8] 杨殷杰,侯本祥,侯晓玫. 高压蒸汽灭菌对R-相镍钛锉表面形态及疲劳折断性能的影响[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2018, 50(5): 882-886.
[9] 柳大为,李晶,郭亮,荣起国,周彦恒. 舌侧矫治器关闭间隙上前牙牙周膜应力变化的三维有限元分析[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2018, 50(1): 141-147.
[10] 傅昭然,田福聪,张路,韩冰,王晓燕. 通用型粘接剂对双固化树脂水门汀牙本质粘接强度的影响[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2017, 49(1): 101-104.
[11] 孙丽颖,郭阳,荣起国,田光磊. 舟骨骨折术后康复治疗的有限元分析[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2016, 48(4): 751-封三.
[12] 甄敏,胡文杰,荣起国. 上颌中切牙冠根折行冠延长术并桩核冠修复的三维有限元分析[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2015, 47(6): 1015-1021.
[13] 林斐, 刘伟, 闫鹏, 岳林. 复合树脂间粘接的微拉伸强度研究[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2015, 47(1): 124-128.
[14] 周团锋, 张相皞, 王新知. 一体化计算机辅助设计与制作氧化锆桩核的三维有限元分析[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2015, 47(1): 78-84.
[15] 杨雪, 荣起国, 杨亚东. 附着体类型对种植支持可摘局部义齿应力分布的影响[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2015, 47(1): 72-77.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!