剖宫产术后经阴道分娩的7种预测模型在中国的临床应用

doi:10.3969/j.issn.1671-167X.2016.05.008

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

目的：初步探讨国外文献报道的7种预测模型在国内临床中对剖宫产术后经阴道分娩（vaginal birth after cesarean，VBAC）的预测价值。方法：收集2007年1月1日至2014年11月31日共53例剖宫产术后再次妊娠阴道试产（trial of labor after cesarean，TOLAC）产妇的相关资料及其临床结局，采用Troyer、Weinstein、Flamm、Gonen、Smith、Grobman、Torri所建立的预测模型对每例患者进行评分，t检验比较应用每种模型预测VBAC失败组与成功组的分值。对成功组及失败组的评分进行分层，采用秩和检验比较每种评分对于成功率预测的相关性；应用受试者工作特征（receiver operating characteristic，ROC）曲线及曲线下面积（area under curve，AUC）评价预测模型的分辨力。结果：53例产妇中，VBAC成功者44例，失败者9例，成功率83.0%。成功组及失败组的分值在Weinstein及Grobman预测模型中差异有统计学意义，在其他各预测模型无明显差异。评分经分层后，VBAC的成功率在各层与原文献中各模型的预测相符，各层间的成功率差异仅在Weinstein预测模型中存在统计学差异。Weinstein预测模型的ROC曲线AUC最大（0.746），但各预测模型间无显著差异。结论：7种预测模型中，Weinstein对本研究人群VBAC成功率的预测优于其他6个模型，但仍需建立符合我国具体情况的VBAC预测模型。

关键词: , 剖宫产后阴道分娩, 试产, 瘢痕子宫, 模型, 统计

Abstract:

Objective：To evaluate the seven existing vaginal birth after cesarean (VBAC) screening tools and to identify additional factors that may predict VBAC or failed trial of labor in China. Methods: In the study, 53 patients with 1 previous cesarean delivery who then delivered between January 1, 2007 and Novenber 31, 2014 were recruited. The average age of the patients was (32.1±3.5) years，the average gestational age was (38.0±2.3) weeks. There was no significant difference of the successful group and the failed group in the maternal/neonatal mortality and morbidity, also in the incidence of the postpartum hemorrhage and the postpartum infection. The probability of VBAC was calculated for each participant using 7 prediction models created by Weinstein, Flamm, Grobman, Gonen, Troyer, Smith and Torri. The data were analyzed using t test, rank-sum test, and receiver operating curve analysis. Results: 44 trial of labor patients had a vaginal birth after cesarean delivery, and the successful rate was 83%. The scores between the successful group and the failed group had significant difference when eva-luated by Weinstein and Grobman scoring models only. After recalculating the successful rate of VBAC in different score levels according to the references, there was significant difference between the rates of different score levels when evaluated by the Weinstein model. The successful rates of different score levels were higher compared to the references (<50%) when evaluated by the Troyer (70%), Gonen (60%), Torri (85.7%) models. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of Weinstein prediction model (0.746) and Flamm prediction model (0.723) were more than 0.7, and there was no significant difference between the seven models. Conclusion: Among the seven scoring models, the Weinstein model is more applicable to the population of our country, but a new model more applying to Chinese women still needs to be created.

Key words: Vaginal birth after cesarean, Trial of labor, Scarred uterus, Models, statistical

中图分类号:

R714

牟田，王雁，刘国莉，王建六. 剖宫产术后经阴道分娩的7种预测模型在中国的临床应用[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2016, 48(5): 795-800.

MU Tian, WANG Yan, LIU Guo-li, WANG Jian-liuMU Tian, WANG Yan, LIU Guo-li, WANG Jian-liu. Application of seven prediction models of vaginal birth after cesarean in a Chinese hospital[J]. Journal of Peking University(Health Sciences), 2016, 48(5): 795-800.

参考文献

相关文章 15

[1]	王楠楠, 袁大晋, 朱昱冰, 丁磊. 结直肠癌根治术后肝转移风险多中心列线图预测模型的构建与验证[J]. 北京大学学报（医学版）, 2026, 58(2): 290-300.
[2]	孟伶宇, 黄永辉, 闫秀娥, 王迎春. 兔食管良性环周狭窄模型的建立[J]. 北京大学学报（医学版）, 2026, 58(2): 380-387.
[3]	田雪丽, 宋志强, 黄永辉, 姚炜. 肌萎缩侧索硬化患者经皮内镜下胃造瘘术后早期并发症及相关危险因素分析[J]. 北京大学学报（医学版）, 2026, 58(1): 190-195.
[4]	李文博, 沈玉凤, 杨咏涛, 单珅瑶, 高梓翔, 温奥楠, 商相宜, 田淯文, 郭殊玮, 王艺蓁, 王勇, 赵一姣. 单侧磨牙咬合干扰的口颌肌表面肌电指标体系构建与判别模型验证[J]. 北京大学学报（医学版）, 2026, 58(1): 89-98.
[5]	闵鹤葳, 吴一波, 史宇晖, 李明子, 孙昕霙. 基于健康行动过程取向模型分析2型糖尿病患者膳食模式及血糖控制的影响因素[J]. 北京大学学报（医学版）, 2025, 57(6): 1145-1152.
[6]	肖宇嘉, 毛渤淳, 周彦恒. 姿势性微笑的三维形态学研究[J]. 北京大学学报（医学版）, 2025, 57(5): 989-995.
[7]	秦秋实, 李蕊, 周妍希, 张玥, 韩铭, 朱鏐娈. 敲减Blimp1基因表达对CCl₄诱导的小鼠肝纤维化模型早期肝损伤的保护作用[J]. 北京大学学报（医学版）, 2025, 57(4): 727-734.
[8]	陈子砚, 张晓悦, 顾亦梧, 常春. 2型糖尿病患者使用E-health管理疾病意愿与影响机制[J]. 北京大学学报（医学版）, 2025, 57(3): 522-528.
[9]	金江, 陈雪, 赵琰, 贾军, 张建中. 卵清蛋白诱导的特应性皮炎小鼠模型中白细胞介素-25的作用及其调控意义[J]. 北京大学学报（医学版）, 2024, 56(5): 756-762.
[10]	柯涵炜, 王起, 许克新. 优化环磷酰胺剂量在间质性膀胱炎/膀胱疼痛综合征啮齿动物模型中的应用[J]. 北京大学学报（医学版）, 2024, 56(5): 908-912.
[11]	何海龙,李清,徐涛,张晓威. 构建显微精索手术治疗精索疼痛的术后疼痛缓解预测模型[J]. 北京大学学报（医学版）, 2024, 56(4): 646-655.
[12]	刘佐相,陈晓薇,赵厚宇,詹思延,孙凤. 真实世界中2型糖尿病患者二甲双胍联用西格列汀的心血管安全性[J]. 北京大学学报（医学版）, 2024, 56(3): 424-430.
[13]	周恬静,刘秋萍,张明露,刘晓非,康佳丽,沈鹏,林鸿波,唐迅,高培. 基于马尔科夫模型的社区人群启动降压药物治疗预防心血管病的策略比较[J]. 北京大学学报（医学版）, 2024, 56(3): 441-447.
[14]	苏俊琪,王晓颖,孙志强. 舌鳞状细胞癌根治性切除术后患者预后预测列线图的构建与验证[J]. 北京大学学报（医学版）, 2024, 56(1): 120-130.
[15]	刘欢锐,彭祥,李森林,苟欣. 基于HER-2相关基因构建风险模型用于膀胱癌生存预后评估[J]. 北京大学学报（医学版）, 2023, 55(5): 793-801.

Metrics

Viewed

Full text

Abstract

Cited

Shared

Discussed