北京大学学报(医学版) ›› 2017, Vol. 49 ›› Issue (6): 990-995. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1671-167X.2017.06.010

• 论著 • 上一篇    下一篇

伴EVI1高表达的中高危急性髓系白血病临床特点及早期治疗效果

段文冰,宫立众,贾晋松,主鸿鹄,赵晓甦,江倩,赵婷,王婧,秦亚溱,黄晓军,江浩△   

  1. (北京大学人民医院,北京大学血液病研究所,造血干细胞移植治疗血液病北京市重点实验室, 北京100044)
  • 出版日期:2017-12-18 发布日期:2017-12-18
  • 通讯作者: 江浩 E-mail:jiangha0090@sina.com
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金创新研究群体科学基金(81621001)项目资助

Clinical features and early treatment effects in intermediate risk and poor risk acute myeloid leukemia with EVI1 positive

DUAN Wen-bing, GONG Li-zhong, JIA Jin-song, ZHU Hong-hu, ZHAO Xiao-su, JIANG Qian, ZHAO Ting, WANG Jing, QIN Ya-zhen, HUANG Xiao-jun, JIANG Hao△   

  1. (Peking University People’s Hospital, Peking University Institute of Hematology, Beijing Key Laboratory of Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation, Beijing 100044, China)
  • Online:2017-12-18 Published:2017-12-18
  • Contact: JIANG Hao E-mail:jiangha0090@sina.com
  • Supported by:
    Supported by the Foundation for Innovative Research Group of the National Science Foundation of China (81621001)

摘要: 目的:探讨EVI1基因阳性的急性髓系白血病(acute myeloid leukemia, AML)患者的临床生物学特点及其对早期化疗疗效的影响。方法: 选择2015年3月至2016年7月在北京大学血液病研究所诊治的361例AML患者病例资料进行回顾性分析,其中33例AML患者EVI1基因阳性,分析比较其临床特征和生物学特征,并比较中危及高危伴EVI1+AML患者的临床与生物学特征及诱导缓解率,分析获得完全缓解(complete remission, CR)的影响因素。32例健康供者进行EVI1/ABL基因水平检测,确定EVI1表达的异常界值。结果:以EVI1/ABL基因定量表达≥8.0%作为EVI1的阳性表达。在361例初发AML中,EVI1+AML患者共33例(9.1%),其中男性16例,女性17例,中位年龄45(18~67)岁,中位随访期为6.6(0.7~13.2)个月。中危核型17例,包括正常核型9例,1例+8;高危核型14例,包括7例-7/7q-,4例t(v;11q23),3例inv(3)/t(3;3),2例未见分裂象。33例患者1个疗程完全缓解率为42.4%,总CR率为60.6%。按《美国国立综合癌症网络(National Comprehensive Cancer Network,NCCN )指南》预后分层,分为中危组16例,高危组17例,无低危组患者。中危组与高危组1个疗程CR率分别为68.8%和17.6%(P=0.005), 总CR率分别为81.3%和41.2%(P=0.032),复发率为7.7%和14.3%。单因素分析,高危染色体核型对1个疗程CR率及总体CR率均有影响(P=0.004、0.029)。高危组患者病死率显著高于中危组(41.2% vs. 6.3%,P=0.039), 且总生存(overall survival, OS)显著低于中危组(P=0.012)。结论: EVI1基因在AML中常伴中、高危核型表达,对于AML患者来说可能不是独立的预后因素,伴-7/7q-、t(v;11q23)及inv(3)/t(3;3)等高危染色体核型的预后差,其1个疗程CR率及总CR率、长期生存率低,病死率高,应尽早行异基因造血干细胞移植。

关键词: 急性髓系白血病, EVI1基因, 缓解率, 预后

Abstract: Objective: To investigate the clinical biological characteristics of EVI1 positive acute myeloid leukemia (AML) and its effect on early chemotherapy. Methods: The clinical and biological cha-racteristics of 33 AML patients with EVI1 positive were retrospectively analyzed in 361 AML patients who were diagnosed and treated in our institute from March 2015 to July 2016, and the clinical and biological features, and rates of the induced remission were compared between the intermediate risk and poor risk with EVI1 positive AML, moreover, the influential factors on complete remission (CR) were analyzed. The expression of EVI1/ABL was tested in 32 healthy donors to confirm the abnormal threshold of EVI1 expression. Results: The definition of EVI1 positive was that the quantitative expression of EVI1/ABL was more than 8.0%. The 33 AML patients with EVI1 positive were found in 361 newly diagnosed AML patients, in which the female and male patients were 17 and 16 respectively, the median age was 45 (18-67) years, with a median followup of 6.6 (0.7-13.2) months. Intermediate karyotype was found in 17 patients(including 9 patients with normal karyotypes,1 patient with +8);unfavorable karyotype was found in 14 patients [including 7 patients with -7/7q-,4 patients with t (v;11q23),3 patients with inv(3)/t(3;3), and 2 patients without mitotic figures]. The rate of CR in the first induction chemotherapy was 42.4%, and the rate of total CR was 60.6%. According to the NCCN, 16 intermediate risk patients and poor risk patients were divided, without favorable risk patients. The rate of CR in the first induction chemotherapy were 68.8% and 17.6% (P=0.005) in the intermediate risk and poor risk respectively, that of total CR were 81.3% and 41.2%(P=0.032), and the rates of relapse were 7.7% and 14.3%.Univariable analysis revealed that unfavorable karyotype could affect the rate of CR in the first reduction chemotherapy and that of total CR (P=0.004, 0.029). The poor risk patients had higher mortality (41.2% vs. 6.3%, P=0.039) and lower overall survival (OS)(P=0.012). Conclusion: EVI1 may be not an independent prognostic factor for the AML patients considering the appearance in the intermediate and poor risk patients. It predicts poor outcome in the EVI1 positive AML patients who have unfavorable karyocytes, such as -7/7q-, t(v;11q23), and inv(3)/t(3;3), and also a low rate of both CR in the first induction chemotherapy and total CR. It also has a low rate of longterm survival and high mortality in the AML patients with EVI1 positive, who may benefit from allogeneic bone marrow transplantation as soon as possible.

Key words: Acute myeloid leukemia, EVI1 gene, Rate of remission, Prognosis

中图分类号: 

  • R733.71
[1] 王飞,朱翔,贺蓓,朱红,沈宁. 自发缓解的滤泡性细支气管炎伴非特异性间质性肺炎1例报道并文献复习[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2021, 53(6): 1196-1200.
[2] 高伟波,石茂静,张海燕,吴春波,朱继红. 显著高铁蛋白血症与噬血细胞性淋巴组织细胞增多症的相互关系[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2021, 53(5): 921-927.
[3] 张梅香,史文芝,刘建新,王春键,李燕,王蔚,江滨. MLL-AF6融合基因阳性急性髓系白血病的临床特征及预后[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2021, 53(5): 915-920.
[4] 蒋艳芳,王健,王永健,刘佳,裴殷,刘晓鹏,敖英芳,马勇. 前交叉韧带翻修重建术后中长期临床疗效及影响因素[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2021, 53(5): 857-863.
[5] 肖若陶,刘承,徐楚潇,何为,马潞林. 术前血小板参数与局部进展期肾细胞癌预后[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2021, 53(4): 647-652.
[6] 于妍斐,何世明,吴宇财,熊盛炜,沈棋,李妍妍,杨风,何群,李学松. 延胡索酸水合酶缺陷型肾细胞癌的临床病理特征及预后[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2021, 53(4): 640-646.
[7] 赵勋,颜野,黄晓娟,董靖晗,刘茁,张洪宪,刘承,马潞林. 癌栓粘连血管壁对非转移性肾细胞癌合并下腔静脉癌栓患者手术及预后的影响[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2021, 53(4): 665-670.
[8] 陈怀安,刘硕,李秀君,王哲,张潮,李凤岐,苗文隆. 炎症生物标志物对输尿管尿路上皮癌患者预后预测的临床价值[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2021, 53(2): 302-307.
[9] 刘世博,高辉,冯元春,李静,张彤,万利,刘燕鹰,李胜光,罗成华,张学武. 腹膜后纤维化致肾盂积水的临床分析:附17例报道[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2020, 52(6): 1069-1074.
[10] 陈伟钱,戴小娜,余叶,王沁,梁钧昱,柯旖旎,易彩虹,林进. 原发性干燥综合征合并自身免疫性肝病的临床特点及预后分析[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2020, 52(5): 886-891.
[11] 姜妮,乔国梁,王小利,周心娜,周蕾,宋雨光,赵艳杰,任军. 中性粒细胞与淋巴细胞比例对评估接受过继性细胞免疫治疗的晚期胰腺癌患者预后的临床意义[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2020, 52(3): 597-602.
[12] 马茹,李鑫宝,闫风彩,林育林,李雁. 肿瘤间质比评估阑尾来源腹膜假黏液瘤的临床价值[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2020, 52(2): 240-246.
[13] 王文鹏,王捷夫,胡均,王俊锋,刘嘉,孔大陆,李健. 结直肠间质瘤临床病理特征及预后分析[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2020, 52(2): 353-361.
[14] 王骁,李兆星,范焕芳,魏莉瑛,郭旭瑾,郭娜,王彤. 罕见小肠囊腺瘤1例报道[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2020, 52(2): 382-384.
[15] 欧阳雨晴,倪莲芳,刘新民. 恶性孤立性肺结节患者预后因素分析[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2020, 52(1): 158-162.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] 张三. 中文标题测试[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2010, 42(1): 1 -10 .
[2] 赵磊, 王天龙 . 右心室舒张末期容量监测用于肝移植术中容量管理的临床研究[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2009, 41(2): 188 -191 .
[3] 万有, , 韩济生, John E. Pintar. 孤啡肽基因敲除小鼠电针镇痛作用增强[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2009, 41(3): 376 -379 .
[4] 张燕, 韩志慧, 钟延丰, 王盛兰, 李玲玲, 郑丹枫. 骨骼肌活组织检查病理诊断技术的改进及应用[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2009, 41(4): 459 -462 .
[5] 赵奇, 薛世华, 刘志勇, 吴凌云. 同向施压测定自酸蚀与全酸蚀粘接系统粘接强度[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2010, 42(1): 82 -84 .
[6] 林红, 王玉凤, 吴野平. 学校生活技能教育对小学三年级学生行为问题影响的对照研究[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2007, 39(3): 319 -322 .
[7] 丰雷, 程嘉, 王玉凤. 注意缺陷多动障碍儿童的运动协调功能[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2007, 39(3): 333 -336 .
[8] 李岳玲, 钱秋瑾, 王玉凤. 儿童注意缺陷多动障碍成人期预后及其预测因素[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2007, 39(3): 337 -340 .
[9] . 书讯[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2007, 39(3): 225 -328 .
[10] 牟向东, 王广发, 刁小莉, 阙呈立. 肺黏膜相关淋巴组织型边缘区B细胞淋巴瘤一例[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2007, 39(4): 346 -350 .