北京大学学报(医学版) ›› 2018, Vol. 50 ›› Issue (1): 98-103. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1671-167X.2018.01.017

• 论著 • 上一篇    下一篇

骨性Ⅱ类和Ⅲ类高角错牙合患者下切牙区的牙槽骨形态分析

马静1,2,江久汇1△   

  1. (1. 北京大学口腔医学院·口腔医院,正畸科口腔数字化医疗技术和材料国家工程实验室口腔数字医学北京市重点实验室, 北京100081; 2. 北京市崇文口腔医院口腔正畸科, 北京100062)
  • 出版日期:2018-02-18 发布日期:2018-02-18
  • 通讯作者: 江久汇 E-mail:drjiangw@163.com
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金(81571002)和北京市自然科学基金(7162203)资助

Morphological analysis of alveolar bone of anterior mandible in high-angle skeletal class Ⅱ and class Ⅲ malocclusions assessed with cone-beam computed tomography

MA Jing1,2, JIANG Jiu-hui1△   

  1. (1. Department of Orthodontics, Peking University School and Hospital of Stomatology & National Engineering Laboratory for Digital and Material Technology of Stomatology & Beijing Key Laboratory of Digital Stomatology, Beijing 100081, China; 2. Department of Orthodontics, Beijing Chongwen Hospital of Stomatology, Beijing 100062, China)
  • Online:2018-02-18 Published:2018-02-18
  • Contact: JIANG Jiu-hui E-mail:drjiangw@163.com
  • Supported by:
    Supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (81571002) and Beijing Natural Science Foundation (7162203)

摘要: 目的:应用锥束计算机体层摄影术(cone-beam computed tomography,CBCT)研究成年骨性Ⅱ类及Ⅲ类高角错牙合患者下切牙区牙槽骨形态的差异。方法:从2015年10月至2017年8月在北京大学口腔医院就诊并且拍摄了CBCT的患者中筛选出骨性Ⅱ类及Ⅲ类高角错牙合患者各31名,对患者下切牙区牙槽骨的高度、牙槽骨面积及牙槽骨厚度进行测量,并应用SPSS 17.0软件进行独立样本t检验分析。结果:两组相比,骨性Ⅲ类组患者的下切牙牙槽骨唇侧根尖区的牙槽骨面积及唇侧总牙槽骨面积均低于骨性Ⅱ类组患者,下切牙唇侧根尖处的牙槽骨厚度也低于骨性Ⅱ类组患者,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。骨性Ⅲ类组患者下切牙牙槽骨舌侧釉牙骨质界(cemento-enamel junction,CEJ)下6 mm处牙槽骨面积、舌侧根尖区及舌侧总牙槽骨面积均低于骨性Ⅱ类组患者。在下切牙牙槽骨舌侧CEJ下4 mm、6 mm以及舌侧根尖处的牙槽骨厚度,骨性Ⅲ类组患者也低于骨性Ⅱ类组患者,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论:骨性Ⅲ类高角错牙合患者下切牙区牙槽骨的面积及厚度在唇舌侧根尖区明显小于骨性Ⅱ类高角错牙合患者,在对其进行前牙的唇舌向移动时尤其要注意转矩的控制,以防止根吸收及骨开窗、骨开裂的发生。

关键词: 错牙合, 牙槽骨, 锥束计算机体层摄影术

Abstract: Objective: To evaluate the difference of features of alveolar bone support under lower anterior teeth between high-angle adults with skeletal class Ⅱ malocclusions and high-angle adults presenting skeletal class Ⅲ malocclusions by using cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT). Methods: Patients who had taken the images of CBCT were selected from the Peking University School and Hospital of Stomatology between October 2015 and August 2017. The CBCT archives from 62 high-angle adult cases without orthodontic treatment were divided into two groups based on their sagittal jaw relationships: skeletal class Ⅱ and skeletal class Ⅲ. vertical bone level (VBL), alveolar bone area (ABA), and the width of alveolar bone were measured respectively at the 2 mm, 4 mm, 6 mm below the cemento-enamel junction (CEJ) level and at the apical level. After that, independent samples t-tests were conducted for statistical comparisons. Results: The ABA of the mandibular alveolar bone in the area of lower anterior teeth was significantly thinner in the patients of skeletal class Ⅲ than those of skeletal class Ⅱ, especially in terms of the apical ABA, total ABA on the labial and lingual sides and the ABA at 6 mm below CEJ level on the lingual side (P<0.05). The thickness of the alveolar bone of mandibular anterior teeth was significantly thinner in the subjects of skeletal class Ⅲ than those of skeletal class Ⅱ, especially regar-ding the apical level on the labial and lingual side and at the level of 4 mm, 6 mm below CEJ level on the lingual side (P<0.05). Conclusion: The ABA and the thickness of the alveolar bone of mandibular anterior teeth were significantly thinner in the group of skeletal class Ⅲ adult patients with highangle when compared with the sample of high-angle skeletal class Ⅱ adult cases. We recommend orthodontists to be more cautious in treatment of highangle skeletal class Ⅲ patients, especially pay attention to control the torque of lower anterior teeth during forward and backward movement, in case that the apical root might be absorbed or fenestration happen in the area of lower anterior teeth.

Key words: Malocclusion, Alveolar bone, Cone-beam computed tomography

中图分类号: 

  • R783.5
[1] 凌晓彤,屈留洋,郑丹妮,杨静,闫雪冰,柳登高,高岩. 牙源性钙化囊肿与牙源性钙化上皮瘤的三维影像特点[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2024, 56(1): 131-137.
[2] 段登辉,WANGHom-Lay,王恩博. 可吸收胶原膜在颊侧袋形瓣引导性骨再生手术中的作用: 一项回顾性影像学队列研究[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2023, 55(6): 1097-1104.
[3] 刘伟涛,王怡然,王雪东,周彦恒. 锥形束CT研究上颌反复扩缩前方牵引后上颌骨缝的三维变化[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2022, 54(2): 346-355.
[4] 杨刚,胡文杰,曹洁,柳登高. 牙周健康的上颌前牙唇侧嵴顶上牙龈的三维形态分析[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2021, 53(5): 990-994.
[5] 王思雯,尤鹏越,刘玉华,王新知,唐琳,王梅. 两种可吸收生物膜联合去蛋白牛骨基质植入犬拔牙窝成骨的影像学评价[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2021, 53(2): 364-370.
[6] 高璐,谷岩. 中国人群腭中缝形态特点分期与Demirjian牙龄的相关性[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2021, 53(1): 133-138.
[7] 毛铭馨,徐莉,靖无迪,徐筱,侯建霞,李小彤,王晓霞. 骨性安氏Ⅲ类错牙合畸形患者前牙唇侧牙槽嵴顶位置及相关因素分析[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2020, 52(1): 77-82.
[8] 杜仁杰,焦剑,周彦恒,施捷. 侵袭性牙周炎患者正畸前后的咬合变化[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2019, 51(5): 919-924.
[9] 王秀婧,张怡美,周彦恒. 骨性Ⅲ类错牙合畸形患者正畸-正颌联合治疗的稳定性[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2019, 51(1): 86-92.
[10] 张又文,辛天艺,焦剑,周彦恒,施捷. 慢性牙周炎的减数正畸治疗[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2018, 50(2): 308-313.
[11] 贾鹏程,杨刚,胡文杰,赵一姣,刘木清. 根尖片评估单根牙骨内牙根表面积的准确性[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2018, 50(1): 91-97.
[12] 徐筱,徐莉,江久汇,吴佳琪,李小彤,靖无迪. 锥形束CT评判安氏Ⅲ类错牙合上前牙骨开裂与骨开窗的准确性分析[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2018, 50(1): 104-109.
[13] 曹婕1,孟焕新. 锥形束CT用于评估牙槽骨骨缺损的情况和骨再生区域骨密度的变化[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2018, 50(1): 110-116.
[14] 常大桐,周彦恒,刘伟涛. 上颌反复快速扩缩对上气道影响的锥束CT研究[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2017, 49(4): 685-690.
[15] 范少轻,周彦恒. 种植体支抗整体远中移动下颌牙列治疗骨性Ⅲ类错牙合的疗效评价[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2017, 49(3): 531-539.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!