北京大学学报(医学版) ›› 2017, Vol. 49 ›› Issue (3): 495-500. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1671-167X.2017.03.020

• 论著 • 上一篇    下一篇

脾窦岸细胞血管瘤13例

曹钟1,魏建国2,岑红兵1,袁晓露3,周刚4,赵建红1,敖启林5△   

  1. (1. 湖北省黄冈市中心医院病理科, 湖北黄冈438000; 2. 浙江省绍兴市人民医院病理科, 浙江绍兴312000; 3. 湖北省孝感市中心医院病理科, 湖北孝感432000; 4. 湖北省黄冈市中心医院医学影像科, 湖北黄冈438000; 5.华中科技大学同济医学院附属同济医院病理研究所,同济医学院病理学系, 武汉430030)
  • 出版日期:2017-06-18 发布日期:2017-06-18
  • 通讯作者: 敖启林 E-mail:aoqilin@263.net

13 cases of littoral cell angioma in spleens

CAO Zhong1, WEI Jian-guo2, CEN Hong-bing1, YUAN Xiao-lu3, ZHOU Gang4, ZHAO Jian-hong1, AO Qi-lin5△   

  1. (1. Department of Pathology, Hubei Huanggang Central Hospital, Huanggang 438000, Hubei, China; 2. Department of Pathology, Zhejiang Shaoxing People’s Hospital, Shaoxing 312000, Zhejiang, China; 3. Department of Pathology, Hubei Xiaogan Central Hospital, Xiaogan 432000, Hubei, China; 4. Department of Medical Imaging, Hubei Huanggang Central Hospital, Huanggang 438000, Hubei, China; 5. Institute of Patholoy, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan 430030, China)
  • Online:2017-06-18 Published:2017-06-18
  • Contact: AO Qi-lin E-mail:aoqilin@263.net

摘要: 目的:探讨脾窦岸细胞血管瘤(littoral cell angioma, LCA)的临床病理特征、形态学特点和免疫表型,为正确的诊断、避免误诊提供依据。方法:回顾性研究13例LCA患者的临床病理资料、组织学特点并将LCA的石蜡包埋标本进行免疫组织化学染色,同时将5例海绵状血管瘤和4例正常脾窦岸细胞作为对照组。结果: 13例LCA患者包括7名男性和6名女性,年龄从39~70岁,平均54.2岁,中位年龄55岁,这些肿瘤患者中,6例伴有腹腔内恶性、良性肿瘤或者炎症,7例由体格检查被偶然发现。 肿瘤标本大体观发现脾内含有直径为0.5~6.2 cm孤立性或者多发性灰白色结节。肿瘤组织学特征为由相互吻合的血管腔隙构成,血管腔隙内排列丰富的、从圆形到立方状窦岸细胞,并延伸到血管腔,通常可以看到在肿瘤的一些区域中,覆盖于乳头状结构中的窦岸细胞延伸到血管腔内,在血管腔中还可以辨认出另外一种组织细胞样细胞,大小比窦岸细胞大,两种细胞均未显示细胞学非典型性。免疫组织化学显示所有病例中的窦岸细胞对血管内皮细胞和组织细胞标记物(如CD21、CD31、CD68、多克隆FⅧRAg 和ERG)呈阳性表达,而这些细胞对CD8、CD34和WT-1呈阴性表达,表明LCA中的窦岸细胞的免疫表型与对照组不同。结论:LCA是一种良性病变,多发生在老年人,它的病因尚不清楚,然而,由于在一些病例中伴随的其他肿瘤或炎症,因此免疫失调可能和该肿瘤存在关联,LCA中的窦岸细胞在免疫组织化学中呈内皮细胞组织细胞混合性表型,因此这些细胞可能具有介于内皮细胞和组织细胞之间的特征,强调组织学检查和免疫表型对诊断和鉴别诊断至关重要。

关键词: 窦岸细胞血管瘤, 免疫表型分型, 病理学, 临床, 诊断, 诊断, 鉴别

Abstract: Objective: To investigate the clinicopathological features, morphological characteristics, immunophenotypes of littoral cell angioma (LCA) in spleen, and to provide new evidence for making diagnosis and avoiding misdiagnosis. Methods: Clinicopathological data, histological characteristics of 13 cases of LCA were retrospectively studied and immunohistochemical staining was imposed on the paraffinembedded specimens, and 5 cases of cavernous hemangioma, 4 cases of normal littoral cells of spleens were used as control groups, simultaneously. Results: All the 13 LCA patients included 7 males and 6 females, aged from 39 to 70 years with an average of 54. 2 years and a median age of 55 years. Among these tumor patients, 6 cases were accompanied by malignances, benign tumors or inflammation states at abdominal cavities, and 7 cases were accidentally discovered by physical examinations. Grossly, spleens contained solitary or multiple gray red nodules ,which ranged from 0.5 to 6.2 cm in diameter. Histologically, tumors were composed by anastomosing vascular spaces which were lining by plump, rounded to cuboidal littoral cells that extended into vascular lumens. Usually, papillary frameworks that were covered by these cells were also seen extending into the lumens in some areas. Other types of histiocytoid cells were identified in lumens and the sizes were larger than the littoral cells. Both types of cells absented cytologic atypia. Immunohistochemical study demonstrated that the littoral cells in all cases were positive for vascular endothelial and histiocyte markers, such as CD21, CD31, CD68, polyclone FⅧRAg and ERG, while these cells were negative for CD8, CD34, and WT-1. These findings manifested that immunophenotype of littoral cell in LCA distinctive from that in controls. Conclusion: LCA is a benign lesion, which frequently occurs in the elderly. Its etiology remains confusion, however, immune dysregulation may associate with it because of the concomitance with other tumor or inflammation in some cases. The littoral cells in LCA show a hybrid endothelialhistiocytic phenotype on immunohistochemistry, therefore these cells may have features that intermediate between those of endotheliocytes and histiocytes. Emphasizing the histological findings and immunophenotypes is significant for diagnosis and differential diagnosis.

Key words: littoral cell angioma, immunophenotyping,Pathology, clinical, Diagnosis, Diagnosis differential

中图分类号: 

  • R602
[1] 赵业, 刁小莉, 熊焰. 细胞转移技术在微量细胞液病理诊断中的应用[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2026, 58(1): 208-213.
[2] 王月, 梁宇红. 繁茂型牙骨质-骨结构不良1例[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2026, 58(1): 220-224.
[3] 池彦廷, 蒋鸿杰, 陈艳, 徐志秀, 李斌斌. 直接免疫荧光在口腔黏膜寻常型天疱疮诊断中的价值: 基于多指标联合分析的回顾性研究[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2026, 58(1): 68-73.
[4] 顾静妍, 李欣艺, 赵金霞, 穆荣. 误诊为类风湿关节炎、痛风的糖尿病致Charcot关节病1例[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2025, 57(6): 1193-1197.
[5] 王晓林, 李璐瑶, 张雯, 王鸿雁. 3例子宫体中肾样腺癌的临床病理学分析[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2025, 57(6): 1208-1212.
[6] 王小梦, 曾晓君, 李娟. 黎族与汉族系统性红斑狼疮患者的主要临床特征[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2025, 57(6): 1213-1218.
[7] 肖晓笛, 夏有辰, 柳剑英, 付鹏. 左侧胸锁乳突肌间血管内乳头状内皮增生1例[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2025, 57(5): 1002-1004.
[8] 孙翔宇, 袁超, 周芯竹, 刁婧, 郑树国. 唾液微生态在口腔及全身疾病早期防治中的应用[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2025, 57(5): 859-863.
[9] 孙建军, 马千权, 尹晓亮, 杨辰龙, 张嘉, 陈素华, 吴超, 谢京城, 韩芸峰, 林国中, 司雨, 杨军, 邬海博, 赵强. 任意维度重建磁共振对骶管囊肿进行精准分型对于指导微创手术和康复的意义[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2025, 57(2): 303-308.
[10] 陈钊, 邱永康, 康磊. 经典型Sweet综合征 18F-FDG PET/CT多脏器异常显像1例[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2025, 57(2): 403-407.
[11] 方媛媛, 徐帆, 雷杰, 张昊, 张文宇, 孙宇, 吴宏新, 傅开元, 毛伟玉. 基于颞下颌关节紊乱病诊断标准的临床自动诊断系统的建立及验证[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2025, 57(1): 192-201.
[12] 王红彦, 李鑫铭, 房柯池, 朱华群, 贾汝琳, 王晶. 系统性红斑狼疮疾病活动度相关特征分析及评估模型的构建[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2024, 56(6): 1017-1022.
[13] 车佳璐, 刘子臣, 李琨, 张晨, 车南颖. 全自动EasyNAT核酸快速检测系统检测石蜡包埋组织诊断结核病的临床价值[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2024, 56(6): 1047-1051.
[14] 罗丹, 黄海建, 陈新, 陈小岩. 原发子宫肝样腺癌2例临床病理分析及文献复习[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2024, 56(6): 1126-1131.
[15] 赵亮, 史成龙, 马柯, 赵静, 王潇, 邢晓燕, 莫万星, 练益瑞, 高超, 李玉慧. 抗合成酶综合征重叠类风湿关节炎患者的免疫学特征[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2024, 56(6): 972-979.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!