北京大学学报(医学版) ›› 2017, Vol. 49 ›› Issue (6): 1044-1049. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1671-167X.2017.06.019

• 论著 • 上一篇    下一篇

咪达唑仑联合丙泊酚靶控输注静脉镇静对拔除下颌第三磨牙患者焦虑水平的影响

王天骄,刘宇△,关明△   

  1. (北京大学口腔医学院·口腔医院,口腔颌面外科口腔数字化医疗技术和材料国家工程实验室口腔数字医学北京市重点实验室, 北京100081)
  • 出版日期:2017-12-18 发布日期:2017-12-18
  • 通讯作者: 刘宇,关明 E-mail:liuyu4145@sina.com, guanming0128@vip.sina.com

Intravenous sedation with midazolam and propofol target controlled infusion on patients’ perioperative anxiety under the mandibular third molar extraction

WANG Tian-jiao, LIU Yu△, GUAN Ming△   

  1. (Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Peking University School and Hospital of Stomatology & National Engi-neering Laboratory for Digital and Material Technology of Stomatology & Beijing Key Laboratory of Digital Stomatology, Beijing 100081, China)
  • Online:2017-12-18 Published:2017-12-18
  • Contact: LIU Yu, GUAN Ming E-mail:liuyu4145@sina.com, guanming0128@vip.sina.com

摘要: 目的:研究咪达唑仑联合丙泊酚靶控输注(target controlled infusion,TCI)静脉镇静对拔除下颌第三磨牙患者在围手术期焦虑水平的影响。方法:选择北京大学口腔医院拔除下颌阻生第三磨牙,在初次就诊时状态焦虑量表(state anxiety inventory,SAI)得分≥38分的患者,根据是否于静脉镇静下拔牙分为静脉镇静+局部麻醉组(intravenous sedation,IVS)和局部麻醉组(local anesthesia,LA)。每组患者再根据初次就诊时的SAI评分分为两个亚组:IVS-Ⅰ、LA-Ⅰ(SAI得分38~50)和IVS-Ⅱ、LAⅡ(SAI得分51~80)。根据患者在初诊(T1)、手术前(T2)和手术后7 d(T3)时SAI评分,评价患者在手术前后的焦虑情况。通过观察患者术中的心率、血压和疼痛视觉模拟评分(visual analogue scale,VAS)评价患者手术中的焦虑情况。结果:IVS组和LA组在T1、T2、T3时的SAI评分差异无统计学意义(P>0.05),IVS组在术中的心率、血压和VAS疼痛评分显著低于LA组(P<0.001)。结论:咪达唑仑联合丙泊酚靶控输注静脉镇静可以显著降低拔除下颌第三磨牙患者术中的焦虑,提高手术的舒适性,使心率、血压、血氧饱和度维持在正常水平。但对比两组患者的SAI评分发现,静脉镇静对初诊(T1)、手术前(T2)、手术后7 d(T3)的焦虑水平无明显影响。

关键词: 清醒镇静, 麻醉, 静脉, 焦虑, 磨牙, 第三, 拔牙

Abstract: Objective: To evaluate whether midazolam with propofol target controlled infusion (TCI) intravenous sedation during the mandibular third molar extraction influences patients’ perioperative anxiety. Methods: The subjects were patients who planned to undergo the mandibular third molar extraction in Peking University School and Hospital of Stomatology, whose state anxiety inventory (SAI) scores were≥38 at the initial visit. They were divided into intravenous sedation group (IVS) and local anesthesia group (LA) on the basis of the planned intravenous sedation. Each group was divided into two subgroups according to the overall SAI scores at the initial visit: IVS-Ⅰ, LA-Ⅰ(SAI: 38-50) and IVS-Ⅱ, LA-Ⅱ (SAI: 51-80). The anxiety before and after the surgery was evaluated by the SAI scores at the initial visit (T1), before surgery (T2) and 7 days after surgery (T3). The anxiety during the surgery was evaluated by the heart rate, blood pressure and visual analogue scale (VAS) scores. Results: There were no significant differences on SAI at T1, T2, and T3 in the two groups (P>0.05). The heart rate, blood pressure and VAS pain scores of IVS group were significantly lower than those of LA group during the surgery (P<0.001). Conclusion: Intravenous sedation with midazolam and propofol TCI was effective on the patients’ anxiety during the third molar extraction, which successfully made the patients more comfortable and their heart rate, blood pressure and oxygen saturation more stable during the surgery. But there were no significant differences on the patients’ anxiety at the initial visit (T1), before surgery (T2) and 7 days after surgery (T3) according to the SAI scores in the two groups.

Key words: Conscious sedation, Anesthesia, intravenous, Anxiety, Molar, third, Tooth extraction

中图分类号: 

  • R614.24
[1] 王军, 姚兰, 张宁, 索利斌, 李红培, 魏越, 查鹏, 梁正, 刘鲲鹏. 单侧胸椎旁阻滞对实施双腔气管插管患者血流动力学和意识水平的影响[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2024, 56(5): 890-895.
[2] 万利, 张周沧, 丁嘉祥, 王梅. 中心静脉导管拔除后静脉空气栓塞1例[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2024, 56(5): 938-941.
[3] 张树栋,谢睿扬. 机器人手术时代的肾癌合并腔静脉瘤栓治疗策略[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2024, 56(4): 562-564.
[4] 王滨帅,邱敏,张前进,田茂锋,刘磊,王国良,陆敏,田晓军,张树栋. 6例肾尤文肉瘤伴静脉瘤栓的诊治[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2024, 56(4): 636-639.
[5] 何海龙,李清,徐涛,张晓威. 构建显微精索手术治疗精索疼痛的术后疼痛缓解预测模型[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2024, 56(4): 646-655.
[6] 汤晓菲,李永红,丁秋玲,孙卓,张阳,王育梅,田美伊,刘坚. 类风湿关节炎患者下肢深静脉血栓发病率及危险因素[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2024, 56(2): 279-283.
[7] 冯琦琛,盖铄,王昌明,李选. 经同侧大隐静脉入路髂静脉成型及支架植入术在日间治疗模式中的应用[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2024, 56(2): 322-325.
[8] 陈晨,梁宇红. 复杂根管上颌磨牙的根管治疗3例[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2024, 56(1): 190-195.
[9] 兰东,刘茁,李宇轩,王国良,田晓军,马潞林,张树栋,张洪宪. 根治性肾切除和静脉癌栓取出术大出血的危险因素[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2023, 55(5): 825-832.
[10] 赖金惠,王起,姬家祥,王明瑞,唐鑫伟,许克新,徐涛,胡浩. 新型冠状病毒肺炎疫情期间延迟拔除输尿管支架对泌尿系结石术后患者生活质量和心理状态的影响[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2023, 55(5): 857-864.
[11] 彭清,刘佳君,刘焱,尚华,唐果,韩雅欣,龙丽. Padua预测评分和血清白蛋白水平在评估风湿病住院患者静脉血栓栓塞中的应用[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2023, 55(4): 625-630.
[12] 田慈,白颐,马青变,葛洪霞. 7例肝门静脉积气的临床特征分析[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2023, 55(4): 743-747.
[13] 雷玥,杨颖婷,雷海华. 异位萌出诱导矫治器在第一恒磨牙异位萌出治疗中的应用[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2023, 55(4): 766-封三.
[14] 袁雯,张奕,陈力,蒋家诺,陈曼曼,刘婕妤,马涛,马奇,崔孟杰,郭桐君,王鑫鑫,董彦会,马军. 儿童青少年身体脂肪分布与抑郁和社交焦虑的关联:基于双能X线检测的横断面研究[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2023, 55(3): 429-435.
[15] 史成梅,周阳,杨宁,李正迁,陶一帆,邓莹,郭向阳. 丙泊酚用于无痛胃肠镜检查对患者术后精神活动的影响[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2023, 55(2): 324-327.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!