锁定钢板治疗非骨质疏松性复杂肱骨近端骨折的中期临床及影像学随访研究

doi:10.3969/j.issn.1671-167X.2017.05.020

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 目的回顾性分析采用锁定钢板治疗非骨质疏松性三部分和四部分肱骨近端骨折的临床效果。方法回顾性评估锁定钢板治疗非骨质疏松性三部分和四部分肱骨近端骨折的临床效果,统计患肢的肩关节活动度、临床评分、视觉模拟评分(visual analogue scale,VAS)和影像学检查的结果。结果自2007年1月至2014年10月,采用锁定钢板共治疗107例新鲜非骨质疏松性三部分和四部分肱骨近端骨折,其中67例患者完成至少2年的随访,平均随访时间(43.9±23.3)个月(24~108个月)。在最终随访时,Constant评分平均为(87.1±11.7)分(51~100分),加州大学肩关节评分(the University of California at Los Angeles shoulder score, UCLA)平均为(30.5±3.9)分(18~35分),VAS疼痛评分为(1±2)分(0~7分);主动前屈上举为159.0°±19.3°(80°~180°),体侧外旋为36.8°±19.5°(0°~80°),体侧内旋为T11水平(T2~LS水平)。术后11例患者出现并发症,包括5例螺钉穿出(7.5%),9例肱骨头缺血坏死(13.4%)及5例创伤性骨性关节炎(7.5%),6例合并两种或两种以上并发症。三部分骨折和四部分骨折术后患者的肩关节活动度、临床评分和VAS疼痛评分差异无统计学意义。四部分骨折的术后并发症率及术后肱骨头缺血坏死概率显著高于三部分骨折。结论应用肱骨近端锁定钢板治疗非骨质疏松性三、四部分复杂肱骨近端骨折可得到满意的术后肩关节功能恢复,严格的适应证选择与精细的手术操作是取得手术成功的关键,骨折的复杂程度亦对术后结果产生影响,四部分骨折的并发症发生率以及术后肱骨头缺血坏死率高于三部分骨折。

关键词: 锁定钢板, 肱骨骨折, 近端, 治疗结果, 手术后并发症

Abstract: Objective: To describe long-term results of locking plate used for the treatment of non-osteoporotic fresh three- and four-part proximal humeral fractures with at least 2 years follow-up. Methods: The functional outcomes and the complications of non-osteoporotic three- and four-part fresh proximal humeral fractures treated with locking plate were assessed retrospectively. The active range of motion, the Constant score, the University of California at Los Angeles (UCLA) shoulder score, the visual analogue score (VAS) were employed to evaluate the postoperative shoulder function, and the radiographic images were taken to evaluate the neck-shaft angle of the proximal humeral and postoperative implant-related complications. Results: From January 2007 to October 2014, 107 consecutive fresh three- and four-part non-osteoporotic fresh proximal humeral fractures were treated with a locking plate in our department. Among them, 67 patients completed at least 2 years follow-up. The average follow-up time was (43.9±23.3) months (range: 24-108 months). The mean Constant score was 87.1±11.7 (range: 51-100), the mean UCLA score was 30.5±3.9 (range: 18-35), the mean VAS score was 1±2 (range: 0-7). The mean active forward flexion was 159.0°±19.3° (range: 80°-180°), the mean external rotation was 36.8°±19.5°(0°-80°) and the mean internal rotation was T11 level (T2-LS level). There were 11 patients who suffered from complications. Screw perforations were observed in 5 (7.5%) patients, avascular necrosis of the humeral head was observed in 9 (13.4%) patients and traumatic osteoarthritis was observed in 5 (7.5%) patients. Six patients showed two or more complications. There was no significant difference in outcomes when comparing the patients with three-part fractures (31 patients) with those with four-part fractures (36 patients). The rates of complications and avascular necrosis were significantly higher in the four-part fracture group than in the three-part fracture group. Conclusion: The locking plate is an effective method in treating three- and four-part non-osteoporotic fresh proximal humeral fractures. Strict surgical indication and precise surgical skill are the key points for successful treating non-osteoporotic fresh proximal humeral fractures. There is a higher rate of complications and avascular necrosis of the humeral head in the four-part fractures than in the three-part fractures.

Key words: Locking plate, Humeral fractures, proximal, Treatment outcome, Postoperative complications

中图分类号:

R683.41

李旭, 李奉龙, 鲁谊, 朱以明, 郭斯翊, 李屹钧, 姜春岩. 锁定钢板治疗非骨质疏松性复杂肱骨近端骨折的中期临床及影像学随访研究[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2017, 49(5): 855-860.

LI Xu, LI Feng-long, LU Yi, ZHU Yi-ming, GUO Si-yi, LI Yi-jun, JIANG Chun-yan. Clinical study on locking plate for the treatment of non-osteoporotic complex proximal humeral fractures[J]. Journal of Peking University(Health Sciences), 2017, 49(5): 855-860.

参考文献

[1] Helmy N, Hintermann B. New trends in the treatment of proximal humerus fractures [J]. Clin Orthop, 2006, 442: 100-108.
[2] Owsley KC, Gorczyca JT. Fracture displacement and screw cutout after open reduction and locked plate fixation of proximal humeral fractures corrected [J]. J Bone Joint Surg Am, 2008, 90(2): 233-240.
[3] Sproul RC, Iyengar JJ, Devcic Z, et al. A systematic review of locking plate fixation of proximal humerus fractures [J]. Injury, 2011, 42(4): 408-413.
[4] Krappinger D, Bizzotto N, Riedmann S, et al. Predicting failure after surgical fixation of proximal humerus fractures [J]. Injury, 2011, 42(11): 1283-1288.
[5] Sanders RJ, Thissen LG, Teepen JC, et al. Locking plate versus nonsurgical treatment for proximal humeral fractures: better midterm outcome with nonsurgical treatment [J]. J Shoulder Elbow Surg, 2011, 20(7): 1118-1124.
[6] Jost B, Spross C, Grehn H, et al. Locking plate fixation of fractures of the proximal humerus: analysis of complications, revision strategies and outcome [J]. J Shoulder Elbow Surg, 2013, 22(4): 542-549.
[7] Brunner F, Sommer C, Bahrs C, et al. Open reduction and internal fixation of proximal humerus fractures using a proximal humeral locked plate: a prospective multicenter analysis [J]. J Orthop Trauma, 2009, 23(3): 163-172.
[8] Moonot P, Ashwood N, Hamlet M. Early results for treatment of three- and four-part fractures of the proximal humerus using the PHILOS plate system [J]. J Bone Joint Surg, 2007, 89(9): 1206-1209.
[9] Mather J, MacDermid JC, Faber KJ, et al. Proximal humerus cortical bone thickness correlates with bone mineral density and can clinically rule out osteoporosis [J]. J Shoulder Elbow Surg, 2013, 22(6): 732-738.
[10] Tingart MJ, Apreleva M, von Stechow D, et al. The cortical thickness of the proximal humeral diaphysis predicts bone mineral density of the proximal humerus [J]. J Bone Joint Surg Br, 2003, 85(4): 611-617.
[11] Ring D. Current concepts in plate and screw fixation of osteoporo-tic proximal humerus fractures [J]. Injury, 2007, 38(Suppl 3): S59-S68.
[12] Parmaksizolu AS, Sökücü S, Ozkaya U, et al. Locking plate fixation of three- and four-part proximal humeral fractures [J]. Acta Orthop Traumatol Turc, 2010, 44(2): 97-104.
[13] Sun JC, Li YL, Ning GZ, et al. Treatment of three- and four-part proximal humeral fractures with locking proximal humerus plate [J]. Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol, 2013, 23(6): 699-704.
[14] Gaheer RS, Hawkins A. Fixation of 3- and 4-part proximal humerus fractures using the PHILOS plate: mid-term results [J]. Orthopedics, 2010, 33(9): 671.
[15] Solberg BD, Moon CN, Franco DP, et al. Surgical treatment of three and four-partproximal humeral fractures [J]. J Bone Joint Surg Am, 2009, 91(7): 1689-1697.
[16] Wild JR, DeMers A, French R, et al. Functional outcomes for surgically treated 3- and 4-part proximal humerus fractures [J]. Orthopedics, 2011, 34(10): e629-e633.
[17] Südkamp N, Bayer J, Hepp P, et al. Open reduction and internal fixation of proximal humeral fractures with use of the locking proximal humerus plate. Results of a prospective, multicenter, observational study [J]. J Bone Joint Surg Am, 2009, 91(6): 1320-1328.
[18] Gardner MJ, Nork SE, Huber P, et al. Less rigid stable fracture fixation in osteoporotic bone using locked plates with near cortical slots [J]. Injury, 2010, 41(6): 652-656.
[19] Virtima P, Telkka A. Cortical thickness as an estimate of mineral content of human humerus and femur [J]. Br J Radiol, 1962, 35(26): 632-633.

相关文章 15

[1]	李伟浩,李伟,张学民,李清乐,焦洋,张韬,蒋京军,张小明. 去分支杂交手术和传统手术治疗胸腹主动脉瘤的结果比较[J]. 北京大学学报（医学版）, 2022, 54(1): 177-181.
[2]	朱正达,高岩,何汶秀,方鑫,刘洋,魏攀,闫志敏,华红. 红色诺卡氏菌细胞壁骨架治疗糜烂型口腔扁平苔藓的疗效及安全性[J]. 北京大学学报（医学版）, 2021, 53(5): 964-969.
[3]	刘中砥,许庭珉,党育,张殿英,付中国. 有限切开复位髓内外联合固定技术治疗股骨转子下骨折的临床随访[J]. 北京大学学报（医学版）, 2020, 52(6): 1102-1106.
[4]	董文敏,王明瑞,胡浩,王起,许克新,徐涛. Allium覆膜金属输尿管支架长期留置治疗输尿管-回肠吻合口狭窄的初期临床经验及随访结果[J]. 北京大学学报（医学版）, 2020, 52(4): 637-641.
[5]	高健,胡立宝,陈尘,郅新,徐涛. 经皮肾镜去石术后出血的介入治疗[J]. 北京大学学报（医学版）, 2020, 52(4): 667-671.
[6]	李潇,苏家增,张严妍,张丽琪,张亚琼,柳登高,俞光岩. ¹³¹I相关唾液腺炎的炎症分级及内镜治疗[J]. 北京大学学报（医学版）, 2020, 52(3): 586-590.
[7]	马凯,曲星珂,许清泉,熊六林,叶雄俊,安立哲,陈伟男,黄晓波. 肾移植术后移植肾输尿管膀胱吻合口狭窄的腔内治疗:13例报道[J]. 北京大学学报（医学版）, 2019, 51(6): 1155-1158.
[8]	詹颖,杜祎甜,仰浈臻,张春丽,齐宪荣. 紫杉醇微球-原位凝胶的制备及其局部注射的抗肿瘤药效[J]. 北京大学学报（医学版）, 2019, 51(3): 477-486.
[9]	刘冰川,杨钟玮,周方,姬洪全,张志山,郭琰,田耘. 肱骨近端骨折微创锁定钢板改良内固定的疗效分析[J]. 北京大学学报（医学版）, 2019, 51(2): 277-282.
[10]	杨泽川,刘朝旭,林阳,胡伟华,陈文坚,李锋,曾恒. 颈后路单开门椎管扩大成形术全钛板与交替钛板、缝线固定治疗颈椎病的对比研究[J]. 北京大学学报（医学版）, 2019, 51(1): 187-193.
[11]	游文喆,窦桂丽,夏斌. 乳牙间接牙髓治疗两年疗效观察及影响因素分析[J]. 北京大学学报（医学版）, 2019, 51(1): 65-69.
[12]	李欣艺,赵金霞,刘湘源. 抗磷脂抗体相关性复发性流产的诊治:附75例抗磷脂综合征患者妊娠期用药和结局分析[J]. 北京大学学报（医学版）, 2018, 50(6): 956-961.
[13]	徐稼轩,王宏志,董军,陈小杰,杨勇,陈仁雄,王国栋. 食管癌术后急性肺损伤/急性呼吸窘迫综合征的危险因素分析[J]. 北京大学学报（医学版）, 2018, 50(6): 1057-1062.
[14]	张茗茗，郑迎东，梁宇红. 牙髓根尖周病根管治疗疗效预测模型的建立[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2018, 50(1): 123-130.
[15]	刘中砥，马明太，陈建海，付中国，姜保国. 肱骨近端骨折“时间-角度测量”复位评估技术及临床疗效评估[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2017, 49(6): 1003-1007.

Metrics

Viewed

Full text

Abstract

Cited

Shared

Discussed