北京大学学报(医学版) ›› 2017, Vol. 49 ›› Issue (5): 889-892. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1671-167X.2017.05.026

• 技术方法 • 上一篇    下一篇

不同手术方法治疗膀胱阴道瘘

张维宇, 胡浩, 张晓鹏, 孙屹然, 王焕瑞, 许克新   

  1. 北京大学人民医院泌尿外科, 北京 100044
  • 收稿日期:2017-03-15 出版日期:2017-10-18 发布日期:2017-10-18

Comparison and discussion of different surgical methods used to treat vesicovaginal fistulas

ZHANG Wei-yu, HU Hao, ZHANG Xiao-peng, SUN Yi-ran, WANG Huan-rui, XU Ke-xin   

  1. Department of Urology, Peking University People’s Hospital, Beijing 100044, China
  • Received:2017-03-15 Online:2017-10-18 Published:2017-10-18

摘要: 目的 比较不同手术术式治疗膀胱阴道瘘的易行性及患者预后,评价电凝术用于小直径膀胱阴道瘘治疗的价值。方法 选择北京大学人民医院泌尿外科2008年10月至2016年11月收治并持续随访的膀胱阴道瘘患者资料进行回顾性分析,共计19例,患者年龄31~55岁,中位年龄48岁;病程1~24个月,中位病程3个月,比较不同手术术式用于膀胱阴道瘘治疗的瘘口情况和手术预后等是否存在差异。结果 3例行电凝术,4例经阴道修补,7例开放腹腔切开膀胱前壁进行修补,5例进行腹腔镜修补。除1例患者拒绝留置尿管和D-J管外,其余患者术后常规留置尿管与双侧D-J管。68.2%的病例(13例)手术成功,术后未再发生阴道漏液。63.2%的病例(12例)手术一次成功,术后平均1.5个月完全恢复。3例行电凝术修复的患者,1例重复手术2次,术后1个月恢复,另外2例均在术后1个月拔除尿管和D-J管后恢复;4例经阴道修补的患者,3例在术后1个月拔出尿管和D-J管后恢复,1例术后恢复差;7例开放手术的患者中,5例手术效果好,术后恢复佳,1例转外院继续治疗,1例于北京大学人民医院进行二次手术,预后仍差;5例腹腔镜修复的患者,3例一次手术成功,术后1个月拔管后痊愈,2例患者于外院进行二次手术,术后愈合差。电凝术用于治疗膀胱阴道瘘,手术简便易行,手术时间短,住院时间短,患者恢复佳。结论 电凝术创伤小,出血少,效果好;经阴道修补适合瘘口位置低,利于暴露手术视野的病例;开放手术、腹腔镜手术适合复杂性膀胱阴道瘘,尤其是需要同时处理输尿管开口狭窄、输尿管瘘等并发症的病例,但手术时间长、出血多、创伤大,不利于术后恢复。对于单一瘘口、瘘口直径小的膀胱阴道瘘推荐首选电凝术。

关键词: 膀胱阴道瘘, 治疗, 修补, 手术术式, 电凝术

Abstract: Objective: To compare the feasibility and prognosis of different surgical methods used for vesicovaginal fistulas and to explore the value of electrocoagulation treating small ones. Methods: The medical data of 19 patients who had undertaken transvaginal VVF repairs in Peking University People’s Hospital between October 2008 and November 2016 were retrospectively collected. The follow-ups were performed.The patients’ age ranged from 31 to 55 years with the median age of 48 years and the history length ranged from 1 month to 24 months with the median length of 3 months. Their fistula situation, surgical methods and prognosis were analyzed and the differences and similarities were compared. Results: Three patients (15.79%) was performed by electrocoagulation, 4 (21.05%) by transvaginal repair, 5 (21.32%) by laparoscopic repair and 7(36.84%) by open operation. Except one patient who rejected urinary catheter and D-J catheters, the rest of the patients discharged with catheters. Twelve patients (63.2%) got full satisfaction with one operation. One of the 3 patients who undertook electrocoagulation repeated the operation for twice and got completely cured within 1 month while the other two undertook the operation once and got dry within 1 month. Three patients who undertook transvaginal repair got dry within 1 month. Two of the 5 patients who undertook laparoscopic repair had readmission for a second operation and the other 3 got dry after operation. Five of the 7 open repair patients got dry while the other 2 attempted other center for treatment. Conclusion: Transvaginal repair has been the main surgery procedure for VVF, but it is limited by the location of fistula and the condition of vaginal. For patients not suitable for transvaginal repair, laparoscopic repair and open surgery are feasible. However both laparoscopic repair and open surgery are more invasive. Based on that, electrocoagulation becomes a better choice. In our research, patients with small and high location fistula treated by electrocoagulation got a higher cure rate and bear less surgical trauma. Electrocoagulation used in the treatment of VVF showed advantages of less trauma, less bleeding and better satisfaction. Fistulas with low location were more suitable for transvaginal repair. Complex VVF, especially with narrow ureteral open and ureteral fistulas, were more suitable for open and laparoscopic repair. As for single and small fistula, the electrocoagulation can be the first choice.

Key words: Vesicovaginal fistula, Therapy, Repair, Surgical method, Electrocoagulation

中图分类号: 

  • R694+.13
[1] 徐月敏, 撒应龙, 傅强, 等. 女性下尿路阴道瘘治疗术式的选择[J]. 中华泌尿外科杂志, 2013, 34(10): 760-766.
[2] Bora GS, Singh S, Mavuduru RS, et al. Robot-assisted vesicova-ginal fistula repair: a safe and feasible technique [J]. Int Urogynecol J, 2017, 28(6): 957-962.
[3] Agrawal V, Kucherov V, Bendana E, et al. Robot-assisted laparoscopic repair of vesicovaginal fistula: a single-center experience [J]. Urology, 2015, 86(2): 276-281.
[4] Theofanides MC, Sui W, Sebesta EM, et al. Vesicovaginal fistulas in the developed world: an analysis of disease characteristics, treatments, and complications of surgical repair using the ACS-NSQIP database [J/OL]. Neurourol Urodyn (2016-10-19)[2017-03-01]. http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/nau.23167/abstract;jsessionid=1F80016E5AEAF50B7EDD143-39B62BED5.f04t01.
[5] Ghosh B, Wats V, Pal DK. Comparative analysis of outcome between laparoscopic versus open surgical repair for vesico-vaginal fistula [J]. Obstet Gynecol Sci, 2016, 59(6): 525-529.
[6] Bodner-Adler B, Hanzal E, Pablik E, et al. Management of vesicovaginal fistulas (VVFs) in women following benign gynaecologic surgery: A systematic review and meta-analysis [J]. PLoS One, 2017, 12(2): e0171554.
[7] Stovsky MD, Ignatoff JM, Blum MD, et al. Use of electrocoagulation in the treatment of vesicovaginal fistulas [J]. J Urol, 1994, 152(5 Pt 1): 1443-1444.
[8] Mary G, Neil H. Vesicovaginal fistulae [J]. Indian J Urol, 2010, 26(2): 253-256.
[9] Singh R, Schmitt JJ, Knoedler JJ, et al. Management of a vesicovaginal fistula using holmium laser ablation [J]. Int Urogynecol J, 2016, 27(6): 969-971.
[10] Dogra PN, Saini AK. Laser welding of vesicovaginal fistula: outcome analysis and long-term outcome: single-centre experience [J]. Int Urogynecol J, 2011, 22(8): 981-984.
[1] 李熠,尉华杰,邱立新. 种植体折裂的临床分型与临床治疗方案[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2022, 54(1): 126-133.
[2] 李伟浩,李伟,张学民,李清乐,焦洋,张韬,蒋京军,张小明. 去分支杂交手术和传统手术治疗胸腹主动脉瘤的结果比较[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2022, 54(1): 177-181.
[3] 张学武. 痛风关节炎治疗中几个备受关注的问题[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2021, 53(6): 1017-1019.
[4] 翟莉,邱楠,宋惠. 多中心网状组织细胞增生症1例[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2021, 53(6): 1183-1187.
[5] 王飞,朱翔,贺蓓,朱红,沈宁. 自发缓解的滤泡性细支气管炎伴非特异性间质性肺炎1例报道并文献复习[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2021, 53(6): 1196-1200.
[6] 朱正达,高岩,何汶秀,方鑫,刘洋,魏攀,闫志敏,华红. 红色诺卡氏菌细胞壁骨架治疗糜烂型口腔扁平苔藓的疗效及安全性[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2021, 53(5): 964-969.
[7] 杨洋,陈宇珂,车新艳,吴士良. 经阴道修补膀胱阴道瘘失败的预后因素:巢式病例对照研究[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2021, 53(4): 675-679.
[8] 洪鹏,田晓军,赵小钰,杨飞龙,刘茁,陆敏,赵磊,马潞林. 肾移植术后双侧乳头状肾癌1例[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2021, 53(4): 811-813.
[9] 周培茹, 蒋析, 华红. 口腔黏膜病患者口腔种植的时机及注意事项[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2021, 53(1): 5-8.
[10] 贾园,栗占国. 成人巨噬细胞活化综合征诊断困境和个体化治疗[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2020, 52(6): 991-994.
[11] 赵冬慧,李丹阳,张帆,屈磊,张颖,王素霞,刘刚. 4例重链或轻重链肾淀粉样变性患者的临床病理特点[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2020, 52(6): 1162-1165.
[12] 胡双,杨丽萍. 不同血清型腺相关病毒载体转染小鼠视网膜后的表达效率[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2020, 52(5): 845-850.
[13] 徐涛,韩敬丽,姚伟娟. 雄激素剥夺治疗相关心血管疾病的机制与临床对策[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2020, 52(4): 607-609.
[14] 高健,胡立宝,陈尘,郅新,徐涛. 经皮肾镜去石术后出血的介入治疗[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2020, 52(4): 667-671.
[15] 王皓,姜树坤,彭冉,黄毅,王明清,王俊杰,刘承,张帆,马潞林. 个体化尿量控制提高泌尿肿瘤放疗期间膀胱稳定性[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2020, 52(4): 688-691.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] 万有, , 韩济生, John E. Pintar. 孤啡肽基因敲除小鼠电针镇痛作用增强[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2009, 41(3): 376 -379 .
[2] 张燕, 韩志慧, 钟延丰, 王盛兰, 李玲玲, 郑丹枫. 骨骼肌活组织检查病理诊断技术的改进及应用[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2009, 41(4): 459 -462 .
[3] 赵奇, 薛世华, 刘志勇, 吴凌云. 同向施压测定自酸蚀与全酸蚀粘接系统粘接强度[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2010, 42(1): 82 -84 .
[4] 林红, 王玉凤, 吴野平. 学校生活技能教育对小学三年级学生行为问题影响的对照研究[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2007, 39(3): 319 -322 .
[5] 丰雷, 程嘉, 王玉凤. 注意缺陷多动障碍儿童的运动协调功能[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2007, 39(3): 333 -336 .
[6] 李岳玲, 钱秋瑾, 王玉凤. 儿童注意缺陷多动障碍成人期预后及其预测因素[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2007, 39(3): 337 -340 .
[7] 牟向东, 王广发, 刁小莉, 阙呈立. 肺黏膜相关淋巴组织型边缘区B细胞淋巴瘤一例[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2007, 39(4): 346 -350 .
[8] 张宏文, 丁洁, 王芳, 杨惠霞. 一例X连锁Alport综合征女性妊娠期随访[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2007, 39(4): 351 -354 .
[9] 韩金涛, 赵军, 栾景源, 张龙. 多发结核性腹主动脉瘤一例[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2007, 39(4): 361 -364 .
[10] 燕太强, 杨荣利, 郭卫, 沈丹华. 胫骨平滑肌肉瘤伴全身多发骨转移一例[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2007, 39(4): 369 -373 .