北京大学学报(医学版) ›› 2017, Vol. 49 ›› Issue (5): 889-892. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1671-167X.2017.05.026

• 技术方法 • 上一篇    下一篇

不同手术方法治疗膀胱阴道瘘

张维宇, 胡浩, 张晓鹏, 孙屹然, 王焕瑞, 许克新   

  1. 北京大学人民医院泌尿外科, 北京 100044
  • 收稿日期:2017-03-15 出版日期:2017-10-18 发布日期:2017-10-18

Comparison and discussion of different surgical methods used to treat vesicovaginal fistulas

ZHANG Wei-yu, HU Hao, ZHANG Xiao-peng, SUN Yi-ran, WANG Huan-rui, XU Ke-xin   

  1. Department of Urology, Peking University People’s Hospital, Beijing 100044, China
  • Received:2017-03-15 Online:2017-10-18 Published:2017-10-18

摘要: 目的 比较不同手术术式治疗膀胱阴道瘘的易行性及患者预后,评价电凝术用于小直径膀胱阴道瘘治疗的价值。方法 选择北京大学人民医院泌尿外科2008年10月至2016年11月收治并持续随访的膀胱阴道瘘患者资料进行回顾性分析,共计19例,患者年龄31~55岁,中位年龄48岁;病程1~24个月,中位病程3个月,比较不同手术术式用于膀胱阴道瘘治疗的瘘口情况和手术预后等是否存在差异。结果 3例行电凝术,4例经阴道修补,7例开放腹腔切开膀胱前壁进行修补,5例进行腹腔镜修补。除1例患者拒绝留置尿管和D-J管外,其余患者术后常规留置尿管与双侧D-J管。68.2%的病例(13例)手术成功,术后未再发生阴道漏液。63.2%的病例(12例)手术一次成功,术后平均1.5个月完全恢复。3例行电凝术修复的患者,1例重复手术2次,术后1个月恢复,另外2例均在术后1个月拔除尿管和D-J管后恢复;4例经阴道修补的患者,3例在术后1个月拔出尿管和D-J管后恢复,1例术后恢复差;7例开放手术的患者中,5例手术效果好,术后恢复佳,1例转外院继续治疗,1例于北京大学人民医院进行二次手术,预后仍差;5例腹腔镜修复的患者,3例一次手术成功,术后1个月拔管后痊愈,2例患者于外院进行二次手术,术后愈合差。电凝术用于治疗膀胱阴道瘘,手术简便易行,手术时间短,住院时间短,患者恢复佳。结论 电凝术创伤小,出血少,效果好;经阴道修补适合瘘口位置低,利于暴露手术视野的病例;开放手术、腹腔镜手术适合复杂性膀胱阴道瘘,尤其是需要同时处理输尿管开口狭窄、输尿管瘘等并发症的病例,但手术时间长、出血多、创伤大,不利于术后恢复。对于单一瘘口、瘘口直径小的膀胱阴道瘘推荐首选电凝术。

关键词: 膀胱阴道瘘, 治疗, 修补, 手术术式, 电凝术

Abstract: Objective: To compare the feasibility and prognosis of different surgical methods used for vesicovaginal fistulas and to explore the value of electrocoagulation treating small ones. Methods: The medical data of 19 patients who had undertaken transvaginal VVF repairs in Peking University People’s Hospital between October 2008 and November 2016 were retrospectively collected. The follow-ups were performed.The patients’ age ranged from 31 to 55 years with the median age of 48 years and the history length ranged from 1 month to 24 months with the median length of 3 months. Their fistula situation, surgical methods and prognosis were analyzed and the differences and similarities were compared. Results: Three patients (15.79%) was performed by electrocoagulation, 4 (21.05%) by transvaginal repair, 5 (21.32%) by laparoscopic repair and 7(36.84%) by open operation. Except one patient who rejected urinary catheter and D-J catheters, the rest of the patients discharged with catheters. Twelve patients (63.2%) got full satisfaction with one operation. One of the 3 patients who undertook electrocoagulation repeated the operation for twice and got completely cured within 1 month while the other two undertook the operation once and got dry within 1 month. Three patients who undertook transvaginal repair got dry within 1 month. Two of the 5 patients who undertook laparoscopic repair had readmission for a second operation and the other 3 got dry after operation. Five of the 7 open repair patients got dry while the other 2 attempted other center for treatment. Conclusion: Transvaginal repair has been the main surgery procedure for VVF, but it is limited by the location of fistula and the condition of vaginal. For patients not suitable for transvaginal repair, laparoscopic repair and open surgery are feasible. However both laparoscopic repair and open surgery are more invasive. Based on that, electrocoagulation becomes a better choice. In our research, patients with small and high location fistula treated by electrocoagulation got a higher cure rate and bear less surgical trauma. Electrocoagulation used in the treatment of VVF showed advantages of less trauma, less bleeding and better satisfaction. Fistulas with low location were more suitable for transvaginal repair. Complex VVF, especially with narrow ureteral open and ureteral fistulas, were more suitable for open and laparoscopic repair. As for single and small fistula, the electrocoagulation can be the first choice.

Key words: Vesicovaginal fistula, Therapy, Repair, Surgical method, Electrocoagulation

中图分类号: 

  • R694+.13
[1] 徐月敏, 撒应龙, 傅强, 等. 女性下尿路阴道瘘治疗术式的选择[J]. 中华泌尿外科杂志, 2013, 34(10): 760-766.
[2] Bora GS, Singh S, Mavuduru RS, et al. Robot-assisted vesicova-ginal fistula repair: a safe and feasible technique [J]. Int Urogynecol J, 2017, 28(6): 957-962.
[3] Agrawal V, Kucherov V, Bendana E, et al. Robot-assisted laparoscopic repair of vesicovaginal fistula: a single-center experience [J]. Urology, 2015, 86(2): 276-281.
[4] Theofanides MC, Sui W, Sebesta EM, et al. Vesicovaginal fistulas in the developed world: an analysis of disease characteristics, treatments, and complications of surgical repair using the ACS-NSQIP database [J/OL]. Neurourol Urodyn (2016-10-19)[2017-03-01]. http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/nau.23167/abstract;jsessionid=1F80016E5AEAF50B7EDD143-39B62BED5.f04t01.
[5] Ghosh B, Wats V, Pal DK. Comparative analysis of outcome between laparoscopic versus open surgical repair for vesico-vaginal fistula [J]. Obstet Gynecol Sci, 2016, 59(6): 525-529.
[6] Bodner-Adler B, Hanzal E, Pablik E, et al. Management of vesicovaginal fistulas (VVFs) in women following benign gynaecologic surgery: A systematic review and meta-analysis [J]. PLoS One, 2017, 12(2): e0171554.
[7] Stovsky MD, Ignatoff JM, Blum MD, et al. Use of electrocoagulation in the treatment of vesicovaginal fistulas [J]. J Urol, 1994, 152(5 Pt 1): 1443-1444.
[8] Mary G, Neil H. Vesicovaginal fistulae [J]. Indian J Urol, 2010, 26(2): 253-256.
[9] Singh R, Schmitt JJ, Knoedler JJ, et al. Management of a vesicovaginal fistula using holmium laser ablation [J]. Int Urogynecol J, 2016, 27(6): 969-971.
[10] Dogra PN, Saini AK. Laser welding of vesicovaginal fistula: outcome analysis and long-term outcome: single-centre experience [J]. Int Urogynecol J, 2011, 22(8): 981-984.
[1] 刘家骏, 刘国康, 朱玉虎. 免疫相关性重症肺炎1例[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2024, 56(5): 932-937.
[2] 黄教悌,胡菁,韩博. 治疗相关神经内分泌前列腺癌机制研究与靶向治疗新进展[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2024, 56(4): 557-561.
[3] 侯婉音,董捷. 腹膜透析患者获得性肾囊肿出血3例[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2024, 56(3): 546-550.
[4] 李文菁,张保宙,李恒,赖良鹏,杜辉,孙宁,龚晓峰,李莹,王岩,武勇. 胫距跟融合治疗终末期踝和后足病变的中短期临床结果[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2024, 56(2): 299-306.
[5] 冯琦琛,盖铄,王昌明,李选. 经同侧大隐静脉入路髂静脉成型及支架植入术在日间治疗模式中的应用[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2024, 56(2): 322-325.
[6] 彭圣嘉,祁雨,孙丽杰,李丹,王新宇,韩江莉,陈宝霞,张媛. 传入压力反射衰竭合并低钠血症1例[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2024, 56(2): 357-361.
[7] 陈晨,梁宇红. 复杂根管上颌磨牙的根管治疗3例[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2024, 56(1): 190-195.
[8] 任晓萌,李凯一,李春蕾. 基于转录组测序探索口腔扁平苔藓局部激素治疗敏感性相关分子特征[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2024, 56(1): 32-38.
[9] 张晗,秦亦瑄,韦帝远,韩劼. 牙周炎患者种植修复维护治疗依从性的影响因素[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2024, 56(1): 39-44.
[10] 周颖,赵宁,黄竑远,李庆祥,郭传瑸,郭玉兴. 双层软组织缝合封闭技术在下颌骨中早期药物相关性颌骨骨坏死患者手术治疗中的应用[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2024, 56(1): 51-56.
[11] 邹雪,白小娟,张丽卿. 艾拉莫德联合托法替布治疗难治性中重度类风湿关节炎的疗效[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2023, 55(6): 1013-1021.
[12] 薛蔚,董樑,钱宏阳,费笑晨. 前列腺癌新辅助治疗与辅助治疗的现状及进展[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2023, 55(5): 775-780.
[13] 邱敏,宗有龙,王滨帅,杨斌,徐楚潇,孙争辉,陆敏,赵磊,卢剑,刘承,田晓军,马潞林. 腹腔镜肾部分切除术治疗中高复杂程度肾肿瘤的效果[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2023, 55(5): 833-837.
[14] 王明瑞,姬家祥,赖金惠,唐鑫伟,胡浩浦,王起,许克新,徐涛,胡浩. 肾绞痛的药物治疗选择: 一项中国泌尿外科医生用药的现况调查[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2023, 55(5): 871-875.
[15] 姜海红,李小凡,王建六. 宫颈癌慢性放射性肠炎与肠道微生物的关系[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2023, 55(4): 619-624.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!