北京大学学报(医学版) ›› 2018, Vol. 50 ›› Issue (4): 694-699. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1671-167X.2018.04.021

• 论著 • 上一篇    下一篇

上前牙即刻种植即刻修复负载3年后软、硬组织变化的临床观察

吴敏节△,邹立东,梁峰   

  1. (北京大学口腔医学院·口腔医院,第二门诊部国家口腔疾病临床医学研究中心口腔数字化医疗技术和材料国家工程实验室口腔数字医学北京市重点实验室, 北京100101)
  • 出版日期:2018-08-18 发布日期:2018-08-18
  • 通讯作者: 吴敏节 E-mail:dentwu@sohu.com

Clinical observation on soft and hard tissue changes of immediate implantation and immediate reconstruction in anterior region after loading 3 years

WU Min-jie△, ZOU Li-dong, LIANG Feng   

  1. (Department of Second Clinical Division, Peking University School and Hospital of Stomatology & National Clinical Research Center for Oral Diseases & National Engineering Laboratory for Digital and Material Technology of Stomatology & Beijing Key Laboratory of Digital Stomatology, Beijing 100101, China)
  • Online:2018-08-18 Published:2018-08-18
  • Contact: WU Min-jie E-mail:dentwu@sohu.com

摘要:  目的:观察上前牙区即刻种植即刻修复负载3年后软、硬组织的临床变化情况。方法:选择2008年10月至2012年10月期间就诊于北京大学口腔医院第二门诊部并拟在前牙区进行种植治疗的健康患者。观察即刻种植即刻修复及常规种植修复这两种方式的患者在修复即刻及3年后近远中牙龈乳头、唇侧龈缘水平高度以及种植体近远中侧骨水平的变化。结果:即刻种植组和常规种植组分别完成20例和24例,植入种植体分别为22颗和29颗。两组病例在永久修复时种植体稳定系数(implant stability quotient, ISQ)分别为76.32±3.20和76.93±3.36 (P>0.05)。即刻种植组和常规种植组在修复3年后近中龈乳头高度变化分别为(0.34±0.54) mm和(0.05±0.39) mm (P=0.07),远中龈乳头高度变化分别为(0.43±0.42) mm和(0.36±0.48) mm (P=0.13),唇侧龈缘水平变化分别为(0.70±0.40) mm和(0.62±0.34) mm (P=0.23),种植体骨吸收量在近中侧分别为(1.02±0.50) mm和(0.88±0.46) mm (P=0.53),远中侧分别为(1.05±0.34) mm和(0.95±0.47) mm (P=0.21),两组间差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05),但在修复即刻,两组间牙龈乳头指数的分布情况不论是近中还是远中差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论:上前牙即刻种植即刻修复3年后的软、硬组织的变化与常规种植修复基本相当,但前者在缩短疗程、获得理想的种植体周围软组织形态方面要优于后者。

关键词: 牙种植, 骨内, 即刻负荷牙种植体, 牙龈, 美学, 牙科

Abstract: Objective: To observe the change of soft and hard tissue in dental immediate implantation and immediate reconstruction in anterior region after loading 3 years. Methods: Patients with single anterior tooth loss in the Department of Second Dental Center, Peking University School and Hospital of Stomatology from October 2008 to October 2012 were enrolled. The gingival papilla height, labial gingival margin level and peri-implant bone level were measured immediately after the permanent restoration and 3 years later. Results: In the study, 20 patients were treated by immediate implantation and immediate reconstruction for 22 implants; 24 patients were treated by delayed implant for 29 implants. Implant stability quotient (ISQ) value of the two groups showed no significant difference before permanent restoration (P>0.05). In all the cases after loading 3 years, the average mesial gingival papilla height in implant area of the immediate group and delayed group changed by (0.34±0.54) mm and (0.05±0.39) mm respectively (P=0.07), the distal gingival papilla height changed by (0.43±0.42) mm and (0.36±0.48) mm respectively (P=0.13), while the labial gingival margin level shrinkages were (0.70±0.40) mm and (0.62±0.34) mm respectively (P=0.23). Periimplant bone losses in the mesial side were (1.02±0.50) mm and (0.88±0.46) mm respectively (P=0.53), while those in the distal side were (1.05±0.34) mm and (0.95±0.47) mm respectively (P=0.21). All these indicators showed no significant difference between the two groups (P>0.05); When the permanent prostheses delivered, the distributions of the gingival papilla index were different between the two groups whether in the mesial side or in the distal side (P<0.05). Conclusion: The changes of the soft and hard tissue of the immediate implantation and immediate reconstruction in anterior region after loading 3 years were basically equivalent to the conventional implant restoration. But, the former was obviously better than the latter in reducing the duration of treatment and in getting the ideal dental papilla aesthetic effect.

Key words: Dental implantation, endosseous, Immediate dental implant loading, Gingiva, Esthetics, dental

中图分类号: 

  • R782.12
[1] 刘嘉昱, 祝宁, 张育祯, 高贤明, 张宇. 动态导航辅助环钻取骨的准确性[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2026, 58(2): 365-371.
[2] 杨咏涛, 田淯文, 单珅瑶, 李文博, 商相宜, 王艺蓁, 郭殊玮, 高梓翔, 温奥楠, 赵一姣, 王勇. 基于多视图立体视觉的无牙颌种植固定修复软组织数字印模的方法[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2026, 58(1): 126-132.
[3] 温奥楠, 张晓会, 杨咏涛, 高梓翔, 李文博, 单珅瑶, 商相宜, 田淯文, 郭殊玮, 王艺蓁, 王勇, 赵一姣. 基于非刚性配准构建三维颜面微笑仿真序列数据的方法[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2026, 58(1): 139-144.
[4] 孙菲, 王翠, 李思琪, 危伊萍, 余日月, 胡文杰. 赤藓糖醇喷砂与超声治疗对种植体周黏膜炎疗效的随机对照临床研究[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2026, 58(1): 37-42.
[5] 郑苗, 马欣蓉, 陈昊, 赵恒欣, 张宇, 谭建国, 李和平, 王霄. 大气压放电冷等离子体处理对人牙龈成纤维细胞生物学行为的影响[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2026, 58(1): 60-67.
[6] 王宇蓝, 曾浩, 张玉峰. 口腔种植中血浆基质的临床转化现状与前沿探索[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2025, 57(5): 836-840.
[7] 于子杨, 郭厚佐, 蒋析, 韩玮华, 林野. 穿颧种植体上颌窦段成骨的影像学研究[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2025, 57(5): 967-974.
[8] 钱锟, 刘亦洪. 基于直接法和间接法数字印模制作的高嵌体适合性评价的体外研究[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2025, 57(3): 604-609.
[9] 王鹃, 邱立新, 尉华杰. 下颌磨牙穿龈形态设计对种植体周围软组织影响的随机对照临床研究[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2025, 57(1): 65-72.
[10] 李虹, 马斐斐, 翁金龙, 杜阳, 吴彬彰, 孙凤. 口腔即刻种植时动态导航系统的种植精度分析[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2025, 57(1): 85-90.
[11] 吕梁,张铭津,温奧楠,赵一姣,王勇,李晶,杨庚辰,柳大为. 应用三维软组织空间线角模板法评价颏部对称性[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2024, 56(1): 106-110.
[12] 王聪伟,高敏,于尧,章文博,彭歆. 游离腓骨瓣修复下颌骨缺损术后义齿修复的临床分析[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2024, 56(1): 66-73.
[13] 李穗,马雯洁,王时敏,丁茜,孙瑶,张磊. 上前牙种植单冠修复体切导的数字化设计正确度[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2024, 56(1): 81-87.
[14] 刘晓强,周寅. 牙种植同期植骨术围术期高血压的相关危险因素[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2024, 56(1): 93-98.
[15] 卢汉,张建运,杨榕,徐乐,李庆祥,郭玉兴,郭传瑸. 下颌牙龈鳞状细胞癌患者预后的影响因素[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2023, 55(4): 702-707.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!