北京大学学报(医学版) ›› 2014, Vol. 46 ›› Issue (6): 975-979.

• 技术方法 • 上一篇    下一篇

锥形束CT在下颌磨牙根分叉病变诊断中的准确性分析

乔静1,段晋瑜1,孙昌洲1△,柳登高2   

  1. (北京大学口腔医学院·口腔医院 1. 第一门诊部,2. 放射科,北京100034)
  • 出版日期:2014-12-18 发布日期:2014-12-18

Accuracy analysis of cone beam computed tomography in assessing furcation involvements of mandibular molars

QIAO Jing1, DUAN Jin-yu1, SUN Chang-zhou1△, LIU Deng-gao2   

  1. (1. First Clinical Division, 2. Department of Oral Radiology, Peking University School and Hospital of Stomatology, Beijing 100034, China)
  • Online:2014-12-18 Published:2014-12-18

摘要: 目的:评价锥形束CT(cone beam CT, CBCT)在下颌磨牙根分叉病变诊断中的准确性。方法:纳入牙周基础治疗后需进行根分叉区翻瓣术的22颗下颌磨牙共38个根分叉病变,术前对根分叉进行临床探诊,并拍摄平行投照根尖片和CBCT,比较术前临床探诊、根尖片和CBCT与术中实际测量结果之间的一致性。结果:CBCT检查与术中检查所得根分叉病变分度一致性较高(κ=0.976),完全一致率为86.8%。CBCT上测得的根分叉区垂直骨缺损[(4.03±2.27) mm]与术中直接测量值[(4.32±2.31) mm] 差异无统计学意义(P>0.05);两者根分叉区骨缺损的近远中向距离差异无统计学意义(P>0.05),CBCT为(2.05±0.89) mm,术中为(2.07±0.97) mm;两者测得的根柱长差异亦无统计学意义(P>0.05),CBCT为(2.35±0.88) mm,术中为(2.24±0.75) mm;而CBCT测得的水平骨丧失[(3.40±1.27) mm]则小于术中直接测量值[(3.72±1.19) mm,P<0.05],但差异的平均值较小(0.32 mm)。根尖片只能获得垂直骨丧失[(2.17±1.32) mm]和根分叉区骨缺损的近远中向距离[(1.46±0.88) mm]这两个参数,且与术中实际测量结果差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论: CBCT可以较准确地反映下颌磨牙根分叉病变的实际情况,弥补临床检查和传统X线根尖片的不足。

关键词: 锥束计算机体层摄影术, 根分叉部缺损, 磨牙

Abstract: Objective: To evaluate the accuracy of cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) in assessing furcation involvements of mandibular molars. Methods: In the study, 38 furcation involvements of 22 mandibular molars which would accept furcation surgery were included. Pre-surgical examination, CBCT and periapical radiograph were performed. Then, intra-surgical furcation assessments were compared with those data. Results: Intra-surgical findings confirmed 86.8% of the CBCT data, with a weighed kappa of 0.976. Of the four parameters tested of detailed root anatomy and furcation morphology, the vertical bone loss, the mesial-distal bone loss and the length of the root trunk revealed by CBCT were consistent with their respective intra-surgical values (P>0.05): about vertical bone loss, CBCT was (4.03±2.27) mm, but in surgery was (4.32±2.31) mm; about mesial-distal bone loss, CBCT was (2.05±0.89) mm, but in surgery was (2.07±0.97) mm; about length of the root trunk, CBCT was (2.35±0.88) mm, but in surgery was (2.24±0.75) mm. The horizontal bone loss revealed by CBCT [(3.40±1.27) mm] was significantly smaller than that by surgery [(3.72±1.19) mm]. However, the mean difference was only 0.32 mm. Periapical radiograph could only obtain vertical bone loss [(2.17±1.32) mm] and mesial-distal bone loss [(1.46±0.88) mm], which was significantly different from that obtained in surgery. Conclusion: CBCT proved high accuracy in assessing the furcation involvement of mandibular molars.

Key words: Cone-beam computed tomography, Furcation defect, Molar

[1] 王昕莹, 程雪原, 张孟钧, 李菲, 段晋瑜, 乔静. 浓缩生长因子联合引导性组织再生术治疗下颌磨牙根分叉病变的疗效[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2026, 58(2): 372-379.
[2] 王月, 梁宇红. 繁茂型牙骨质-骨结构不良1例[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2026, 58(1): 220-224.
[3] 王菲, 张馨月, 刘木清, 王恩博, 段登辉. 顺牙长轴拔牙法在下颌近中与水平智齿拔除术中的应用及三维有限元分析[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2025, 57(1): 106-112.
[4] 石宇彤, 危伊萍, 胡文杰, 徐涛, 张浩筠. 罹患重度牙周炎下颌磨牙拔牙微翻瓣牙槽嵴保存效果评价[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2025, 57(1): 33-41.
[5] 王昕莹, 程雪原, 张勇, 李菲, 段晋瑜, 乔静. 浓缩生长因子与自固化磷酸钙人工骨联合治疗牙周骨下袋缺损的疗效:临床和影像学评价[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2025, 57(1): 42-50.
[6] 凌晓彤,屈留洋,郑丹妮,杨静,闫雪冰,柳登高,高岩. 牙源性钙化囊肿与牙源性钙化上皮瘤的三维影像特点[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2024, 56(1): 131-137.
[7] 陈晨,梁宇红. 复杂根管上颌磨牙的根管治疗3例[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2024, 56(1): 190-195.
[8] 段登辉,WANGHom-Lay,王恩博. 可吸收胶原膜在颊侧袋形瓣引导性骨再生手术中的作用: 一项回顾性影像学队列研究[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2023, 55(6): 1097-1104.
[9] 雷玥,杨颖婷,雷海华. 异位萌出诱导矫治器在第一恒磨牙异位萌出治疗中的应用[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2023, 55(4): 766-封三.
[10] 田靖,秦满,陈洁,夏斌. 失活剂烧伤致乳磨牙早失及恒牙胚丧失2例[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2022, 54(2): 381-385.
[11] 陈震,谷宝鑫,汤玉芳,闫子玉,倪方端,崔念晖. 应用Delphi法构建下颌阻生第三磨牙拔除难度评分量表[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2022, 54(1): 100-104.
[12] 杨刚,胡文杰,曹洁,柳登高. 牙周健康的上颌前牙唇侧嵴顶上牙龈的三维形态分析[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2021, 53(5): 990-994.
[13] 姜又升,冯琳,高学军. 垫底材料弹性模量对髓腔固位冠修复后上颌前磨牙应力分布的影响[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2021, 53(4): 764-769.
[14] 高璐,谷岩. 中国人群腭中缝形态特点分期与Demirjian牙龄的相关性[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2021, 53(1): 133-138.
[15] 石姝雯,孟洋,焦剑,李文静,孟焕新,栾庆先,王万春. 根分叉病变患牙经牙周非手术治疗后5年失牙状况及多因素分析[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2019, 51(5): 913-918.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!