北京大学学报(医学版) ›› 2017, Vol. 49 ›› Issue (6): 1071-1075. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1671-167X.2017.06.024

• 技术方法 • 上一篇    下一篇

超声造影技术引导下经皮肾穿刺应用于经皮肾镜取石术的单中心初步经验

谌诚*,张博*,韩文科,林健,王刚,张晓春,宋毅,赵峥,张中元,金杰,虞巍△   

  1. (北京大学第一医院泌尿外科, 北京大学泌尿外科研究所,国家泌尿男性生殖系统肿瘤研究中心, 北京100034)
  • 出版日期:2017-12-18 发布日期:2017-12-18
  • 通讯作者: 虞巍 E-mail: yuweif@126.com

Percutaneous renal access for percutaneous nephrolithotomy guided by contrast enhanced ultrasound: a single-center preliminary experience in China

SHEN Cheng*, ZHANG Bo*, HAN Wen-ke, LIN Jian, WANG Gang, ZHANG Xiao-chun, SONG Yi, ZHAO Zheng, ZHANG Zhong-yuan, JIN Jie, YU Wei△   

  1. (Department of Urology, Peking University First Hospital; Institute of Urology, Peking University; National Urological Cancer Center, Beijing 100034, China)
  • Online:2017-12-18 Published:2017-12-18
  • Contact: YU Wei E-mail: yuweif@126.com

摘要: 目的:评估超声造影引导肾穿刺建立工作通道用于经皮肾镜取石术的有效性。方法:该回顾性研究纳入20例在北京大学第一医院诊断为肾结石的患者,患者的人口学基线数据、临床特点、手术治疗以及术后情况来自于北京大学第一医院综合病例数据库。全身麻醉后在超声造影技术实时监控下由同一泌尿外科医师进行经皮肾穿刺,再利用钬激光或气压弹道进行碎石,记录患者的基线临床资料、结石特征以及手术过程,最后,利用统计学分析方法评价超声造影引导经皮肾穿刺用于经皮肾镜取石术的安全性和有效性。结果:20例患者均在超声造影引导下成功行肾穿刺建立工作通道,并完成经皮肾镜取石手术。所有患者均成功穿刺入肾集合系统并建立良好的工作通道,仅1例患者接受了二次肾穿刺,并且所有患者均为通过肾中盏穿刺。中位穿刺时间3.9 min(四分位数:2.9~4.6 min),而中位手术时间是112 min(四分位数:98.5~134.5 min)。术后48 h的泌尿系平片 (kidney ureter bladder, KUB) 显示初步结石清除率为95.0%(19/20),而中位血红蛋白下降水平为10 g/L (四分位数:5.5~14.5 g/L)。2位患者术后出现暂时性发热,并且对抗生素反应良好,除此之外,无其他严重并发症出现。结论:对于处在经皮肾镜取石术手术学习曲线中的泌尿外科医师,使用注射用六氟化硫微泡超声造影引导经皮肾穿刺建立工作通道是一种安全且有效的方法。该技术使肾穿刺过程更加可视化且简单化,可获得相比于普通超声更为清晰的高质量图像。经皮肾镜取石术初学者可能从该项技术中获益从而缩短学习曲线,但是这需要进一步的前瞻性对比研究加以明确和证实。

关键词: 经皮肾镜取石术, 经皮肾穿刺, 肾结石, 超声造影剂

Abstract: Objective: Contrast enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) is an innovative technique that employs microbubble contrast agents to demonstrate parenchymal perfusion. Ultrasound contrast agent was reported to be directly used in human internal lumen to improve the observation capacity of ultrasound. However, CEUS has never been reported to be used in the guidance of percutaneous renal access in percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL). This study aimed to assess the efficacy of CEUS-guided renal access in PCNL. Methods: In this retrospective study, percutaneous renal access was performed under real-time monitoring of CEUS during PCNL in a cohort of 20 patients with renal stones at Peking University First Hospital. Data regarding patients’ demographic and clinical characteristics, therapeutic regimens, and postoperative information were collected from a comprehensive database containing comprehensive medical records of the patients undergoing PCNL. Briefly, the procedure was as follows. With the patient under general anesthesia, renal access was established by the guidance of CEUS. Afterwords, holmium laser, pneumatic or ultrasonic lithotripsy was used by the same urologist. The patient demographics, stone characteristics and procedure details were noted. Finally, appropriate statistical analyses were performed to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of the CEUS-guided percutaneous renal access in PCNL. Results: All the 20 patients underwent PCNL successfully with the help of CEUS guidance for tract creation. The collecting system was successfully accessed in all the patients, and only one patient underwent re-puncture. All the patients approached through a middle-pole percutaneous access. The median puncture time was 3.9 (2.9-4.6) min, and the median operating time was 112 (98.5-134.5) min. The preliminary stone-free rate of PCNL was 95.0% (19/20) as shown by the kidney, ureter, and bladder (KUB) radiographs 48 h postoperation, and the median decline in hemoglobin level was 10 (5.5-14.5) g/L. Two patients had transient postoperative fever and responded well to antibiotics. In addition, no other major complications were observed. Conclusion: CEUS is a safe and effective alternative way of guidance for percutaneous renal access for PCNL beginners. It makes this procedure more visualized and simpler, and produces clearer images than common ultrasonic ones. PCNL beginners might benefit from this method to shorten the learning curve of PCNL, while it warrants further comparative studies to clarify.

Key words: Percutaneous nephrolithotomy, Percutaneous renal access, Renal stone, Contrast-enhanced ultrasound

中图分类号: 

  • R691.4
[1] 王明瑞,刘军,熊六林,于路平,胡浩,许克新,徐涛. 经皮微通道-微电子肾镜-微超声探针碎石术治疗1.5~2.5 cm肾结石的疗效和安全性[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2024, 56(4): 605-609.
[2] 郑生旗,花天池,殷桂草,张伟,姚曳,李一帆. 甘油三酯葡萄糖指数与男性肾结石风险的关联[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2024, 56(4): 610-616.
[3] 田聪,刘军,杨波,乔佳佳,黄晓波,许清泉. 经皮肾镜取石术中异常肾盂黏膜活检结果分析[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2023, 55(5): 948-952.
[4] 王昱,张慧敏,邓雪蓉,刘伟伟,陈璐,赵宁,张晓慧,宋志博,耿研,季兰岚,王玉,张卓莉. 尿枸橼酸定量检测在原发性痛风患者肾结石诊断中的应用价值[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2022, 54(6): 1134-1140.
[5] 安立哲,熊六林,陈亮,王焕瑞,陈伟男,黄晓波. 腹腔镜肾盂成形术联合肾盂镜超声碎石取石术治疗肾盂输尿管连接部梗阻合并肾结石[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2022, 54(4): 746-750.
[6] 戴翔,左美妮,张晓鹏,胡浩,徐涛. 经皮肾镜术中不同憩室颈部处理方式治疗肾盏憩室结石的长期预后[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2021, 53(4): 704-709.
[7] 张蕾,李国梁,党宗辉,次仁罗布,阿勇,吴玲洁,刘立军. 西藏地区肾穿刺活检术后出血风险分析[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2021, 53(2): 298-301.
[8] 王明瑞,王起,胡浩,赖金惠,贺永新,熊杰,刘献辉,刘士军,许克新,徐涛. 标准通道经皮肾镜取石术治疗孤立肾肾结石的长期安全性和有效性[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2020, 52(4): 663-666.
[9] 高健,胡立宝,陈尘,郅新,徐涛. 经皮肾镜去石术后出血的介入治疗[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2020, 52(4): 667-671.
[10] 康宁,蒋一航,蒋宇光,吴栗洋,张际青,牛亦农,张军晖. 内镜联合超声与单纯超声引导建立皮肾通道在多镜联合术中的应用[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2020, 52(4): 692-696.
[11] 朱学华,杨明钰,夏海缀,何为,张智荧,刘余庆,肖春雷,马潞林,卢剑. 机器学习模型在预测肾结石输尿管软镜碎石术后早期结石清除率中的应用[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2019, 51(4): 653-659.
[12] 王少刚, 余虓. 经皮肾镜碎石术——日间手术新探索[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2017, 49(5): 753-755.
[13] 刘可, 肖春雷, 刘余庆, 郝一昌, 张树栋, 田雨, 马潞林. 输尿管软镜下钬激光憩室颈部切开及碎石治疗微小出口肾盏憩室结石[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2015, 47(4): 618-621.
[14] 杨波, 胡卫国, 胡浩, 陈亮, 李建兴, 王晓峰. 逆行肾内手术治疗肾结石失败的原因分析及其对策[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2014, 46(5): 794-797.
[15] 王澍, 施永康, 黄晓波, 马凯, 许清泉, 熊六林, 李建兴, 王晓峰. 上尿路结石合并感染的细菌培养及药物敏感性分析[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2014, 46(5): 798-801.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!