北京大学学报(医学版) ›› 2015, Vol. 47 ›› Issue (1): 67-71.

• 论著 • 上一篇    下一篇

前牙即刻种植和常规种植修复2年后软、硬组织稳定性比较

吴敏节,张相皞△,邹立东,梁峰   

  1. (北京大学口腔医学院·口腔医院第二门诊部, 北京100101)
  • 出版日期:2015-02-18 发布日期:2015-02-18

Comparison of soft and hard tissue stability between immediate implant and delayed implant in maxillary anterior region after loading 2 years

WU Min-jie, ZHANG Xiang-hao△, ZOU Li-dong, LIANG Feng   

  1. (Second Clinical Division, Peking University School and Hospital of Stomatology, Beijing 100101, China)
  • Online:2015-02-18 Published:2015-02-18

摘要: 目的:比较前牙区即刻种植和常规种植两组病例在修复2年后其软、硬组织稳定性的差异。方法:选择2010 年10月至2011 年12月来北京大学口腔医院第二门诊部就诊的拟在前牙区1~2颗不相邻的牙位进行种植治疗的健康患者38名,共植入43颗种植体。在行种植上部修复前均采用种植体支持的临时冠进行牙龈形态的诱导,直至永久修复完成。在修复即刻及2年后测量近远中牙龈乳头、唇侧龈缘水平高度以及种植体近远中侧骨水平的变化。结果:前牙即刻种植组完成16例,植入种植体17颗;常规种植组完成22例,植入种植体26颗。两组病例在永久修复前种植体稳定性系数值(implant stability quotient,ISQ)差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。即刻种植组和常规种植组在修复2年后近中龈乳头高度平均增高分别为(0.15±0.42)mm和(0.06±0.65)mm,远中龈乳头高度平均增高分别为(0.06±0.50)mm和(0.02±0.57)mm;唇侧龈缘水平平均丧失分别为(0.15±0.23)mm和(0.15±0.46)mm;种植体骨吸收量在近中侧分别为(0.67±0.35)mm和(0.69±0.49)mm,远中侧分别为(0.73±0.31)mm和(0.75±0.48)mm;两组间差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05)。结论:两组病例在修复后2年内都显示出良好的效果,其软、硬组织均很稳定,提示这两种方法都可以获得可靠的修复效果。在严格掌握适应征的前提下,前牙区的即刻种植与常规种植在修复后的近期效果相当,但即刻种植在缩短疗程方面显然要优于常规种植。

关键词: 牙种植, 牙龈, 前牙

Abstract: Objective: To compare the peri-implant tissue stability between immediate implant and delayed implant in maxillary anterior region after loading 2 years.  Methods: In the study, 38 patients with single anterior tooth loss in the Second Clinical Division of Peking University School and Hospital of Stomatology from October 2010 to December 2011 were enrolled, and 43 implants were inserted. The gingival contour was induced using implant-supported temporary crowns prior to restoration till permanent prostheses delivered. The gingival papilla height, labial gingival margin level and peri-implant bone level were measured immediately after the permanent restoration and 2 years later. Results: In the study, 16 patients were treated by immediate implant for 17 implants; 22 patients were treated by delayed implant for 26 implants. The implant stability quotient (ISQ) value of the 2 groups showed no significant difference before permanent restoration (P>0.05). In all the cases after loading 2 years, the average mesial gingival papilla height in the implant area of the immediate group and delayed group increased by (0.15±0.42) mm and (0.06±0.65) mm, respectively; the distal gingival papilla height increased by (0.06±0.50) mm and (0.02±0.57) mm respectively; while the labial gingival margin level shrinkages were (0.15±0.23) mm and (0.15±0.46) mm, respectively. The periimplant bone losses in the mesial side were (0.67±0.35) mm and (0.69±0.49) mm, respectively, while in the distal side were (0.73±0.31) mm and (0.75±0.48) mm, respectively. All these indicators showed no significant difference between the 2 groups (P>0.05). Conclusion: Both the cases obtained optimizer results after loading 2 years, and the soft and hard tissues around the implant were very stable, which means that both the protocols can achieve reliable therapeutic effects. If we can handle the indications, immediate implant for anterior teeth shows similar efficacy with delayed implant in the short term. But immediate implant in terms of shortening the course of treatment is clearly superior to delayed implant.

Key words: Dental implantation, Gingival, Anterior teeth

[1] 刘嘉昱, 祝宁, 张育祯, 高贤明, 张宇. 动态导航辅助环钻取骨的准确性[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2026, 58(2): 365-371.
[2] 杨咏涛, 田淯文, 单珅瑶, 李文博, 商相宜, 王艺蓁, 郭殊玮, 高梓翔, 温奥楠, 赵一姣, 王勇. 基于多视图立体视觉的无牙颌种植固定修复软组织数字印模的方法[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2026, 58(1): 126-132.
[3] 郑苗, 马欣蓉, 陈昊, 赵恒欣, 张宇, 谭建国, 李和平, 王霄. 大气压放电冷等离子体处理对人牙龈成纤维细胞生物学行为的影响[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2026, 58(1): 60-67.
[4] 王宇蓝, 曾浩, 张玉峰. 口腔种植中血浆基质的临床转化现状与前沿探索[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2025, 57(5): 836-840.
[5] 于子杨, 郭厚佐, 蒋析, 韩玮华, 林野. 穿颧种植体上颌窦段成骨的影像学研究[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2025, 57(5): 967-974.
[6] 王鹃, 邱立新, 尉华杰. 下颌磨牙穿龈形态设计对种植体周围软组织影响的随机对照临床研究[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2025, 57(1): 65-72.
[7] 李虹, 马斐斐, 翁金龙, 杜阳, 吴彬彰, 孙凤. 口腔即刻种植时动态导航系统的种植精度分析[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2025, 57(1): 85-90.
[8] 王聪伟,高敏,于尧,章文博,彭歆. 游离腓骨瓣修复下颌骨缺损术后义齿修复的临床分析[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2024, 56(1): 66-73.
[9] 李穗,马雯洁,王时敏,丁茜,孙瑶,张磊. 上前牙种植单冠修复体切导的数字化设计正确度[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2024, 56(1): 81-87.
[10] 刘晓强,周寅. 牙种植同期植骨术围术期高血压的相关危险因素[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2024, 56(1): 93-98.
[11] 卢汉,张建运,杨榕,徐乐,李庆祥,郭玉兴,郭传瑸. 下颌牙龈鳞状细胞癌患者预后的影响因素[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2023, 55(4): 702-707.
[12] 丁茜,李文锦,孙丰博,谷景华,林元华,张磊. 表面处理对氧化钇和氧化镁稳定的氧化锆种植体晶相及断裂强度的影响[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2023, 55(4): 721-728.
[13] 欧蒙恩,丁云,唐卫峰,周永胜. 基台边缘-牙冠的平台转移结构中粘接剂流动的三维有限元分析[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2023, 55(3): 548-552.
[14] 孙菲,刘建,李思琪,危伊萍,胡文杰,王翠. 种植体黏膜下微生物在健康种植体和种植体周炎中的构成与差异:一项横断面研究[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2023, 55(1): 30-37.
[15] 王鹃,尉华杰,孙井德,邱立新. 预成刚性连接杆用于无牙颌种植即刻印模制取的应用评价[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2022, 54(1): 187-192.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!