附着体类型对种植支持可摘局部义齿应力分布的影响

北京大学学报（医学版） ›› 2015, Vol. 47 ›› Issue (1): 72-77.

附着体类型对种植支持可摘局部义齿应力分布的影响

杨雪1,2，荣起国3△，杨亚东1△

（1.北京大学口腔医学院·口腔医院修复科，北京100081；2.北京大学口腔医学院·口腔医院第一门诊部，北京100034；3.北京大学工学院生物医学工程系，北京100871）

出版日期:2015-02-18 发布日期:2015-02-18

Influence of attachment type on stress distribution of implant-supported removable partial dentures

YANG Xue1,2, RONG Qi-guo3△, YANG Ya-dong1△

(1. Department of Prosthodontics, Peking University School and Hospital of Stomatology, Beijing 100081, China; 2. First Clinical Division, Peking Univesity School and Hospital of Stomatology, Beijing 100034, China; 3. Department of Biomedical Engineering, Peking University College of Engineering, Beijing 100871, China)

Online:2015-02-18 Published:2015-02-18

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 目的：研究种植支持可摘局部义齿修复下颌远中游离端缺失的应力分布，探讨附着体类型对于种植体、各支持组织、义齿以及附着体的应力影响。方法：建立可摘局部义齿修复下颌双侧前磨牙和磨牙缺失的KennedyⅠ类牙列缺损的三维有限元模型，分别为采用传统可摘局部义齿（无种植体）、种植体+Locator附着体+可摘局部义齿、种植体+Magfit磁性附着体+可摘局部义齿进行修复。分析对比各主要成分的应力分布，得到最大von Mises应力值和位移值。结果：建立含有牙体组织、牙周组织以及种植体、附着体、可摘局部义齿的三维有限元模型。有种植体的模型义齿基托下黏骨膜的最大位移量（Locator模型垂直向载荷9.38 μm、斜向载荷45.48 μm，Magfit模型垂直向载荷9.54 μm、斜向载荷39.45 μm）小于没有种植体的RPD（removable partial dentures）模型（模型垂直向载荷95.27 μm，斜向155.70 μm）。Locator和Magfit两种类型的附着体相比较，Locator模型中种植体颈部周围皮质骨的最大应力值大于Magfit模型（Locator模型垂直向载荷10.850 MPa、斜向载荷43.760 MPa，Magfit模型垂直向载荷7.100 MPa、斜向载荷19.260 MPa）。Magfit模型中末端基牙的牙周膜受力更小（Locator模型垂直向载荷0.520 MPa，Magfit模型垂直向载荷0.420 MPa）。结论：在修复下颌KennedyⅠ类牙列缺损时，种植支持可摘局部义齿可减少对末端基牙的扭力，提高义齿稳定性；Locator和Magfit磁性附着体两者对比，Locator附着体水平约束作用更大。

关键词: 义齿, 局部, 可摘, 义齿, 植入物支持, 义齿精密附着体, 有限元分析

Abstract: Objective: To compare influences of different retention attachments on stress among supporting structures. Methods: By 3-dimensional laser scanner and reverse engineering computer aided design (CAD) software, a basic partially edentulous digital model with mandibular premolar and molar missing was established. Implant attachment and removable partial dentures (RPD) were added into the basic model to build three kinds of models: RPD only, RPD + implant + Locator attachment, and RPD + implant + Magfit attachment. Vertical and inclined loads were put on artificial teeth unilaterally. By means of 3dimensional finite element analysis, the stress distribution and displacement of the main supportive structures were compared. Results: A complete 3dimensional finite element model was established, which contained tooth structure, and periodontal structures. The displacement of the denture was smaller in Locator (9.38 μm vertically, 45.48 μm obliquely) and Magfit models (9.54 μm vertically, 39.45 μm obliquely) compared with nonimplant RPD model (95.27 μm vertically, 155.70 μm obliquely). Compared with the two different attachments, cortical bone stress value was higher in Locator model (Locator model 10.850 MPa vertically, 43.760 MPa obliquely; Magfit model 7.100 MPa vertically, 19.260 MPa obliquely).The stress value of abutment periodontal ligamentin Magfit model (0.420 MPa vertically) was lower than that in Locator model (0.520 MPa vertically). Conclusion: The existence of implant could reduce maximum von Mises value of each supportive structure when Kennedy Ⅰpartially edentulous mandible was restored. Comparing the structure of Magfit and Locator attachment, the contact of Magfit attachment was rigid, while Locator was resilient. Locator attachment could improve stability of the denture dramatically. Locator had stronger effect on defending horizontal movement of the denture.

Key words: Denture, partial, removable, Dental prosthesis, implant-supported, Denture precision attachment, Finite element analysis

杨雪, 荣起国, 杨亚东. 附着体类型对种植支持可摘局部义齿应力分布的影响[J]. 北京大学学报（医学版）, 2015, 47(1): 72-77.

YANG Xue, RONG Qi-Guo, YANG Ya-Dong. Influence of attachment type on stress distribution of implant-supported removable partial dentures[J]. Journal of Peking University(Health Sciences), 2015, 47(1): 72-77.

参考文献

相关文章 15

[1]	展新新,曹露露,项东,汤皓,夏丹丹,林红. 成型方向对3D打印口腔义齿基托树脂材料物理性能及力学性能的影响[J]. 北京大学学报（医学版）, 2024, 56(2): 345-351.
[2]	任晓萌,李凯一,李春蕾. 基于转录组测序探索口腔扁平苔藓局部激素治疗敏感性相关分子特征[J]. 北京大学学报（医学版）, 2024, 56(1): 32-38.
[3]	欧蒙恩,丁云,唐卫峰,周永胜. 基台边缘-牙冠的平台转移结构中粘接剂流动的三维有限元分析[J]. 北京大学学报（医学版）, 2023, 55(3): 548-552.
[4]	周团锋,杨雪,王睿捷,程明轩,张华,韦金奇. 数字化制作简易口内哥特式弓在全口义齿修复正中关系确定中的应用[J]. 北京大学学报（医学版）, 2023, 55(1): 101-107.
[5]	孟令玮,李雪,高胜寒,李悦,曹瑞涛,张毅,潘韶霞. 三种方法建立大鼠种植体周炎模型的比较[J]. 北京大学学报（医学版）, 2023, 55(1): 22-29.
[6]	王跃,张爽,张虹,梁丽,徐玲,程元甲,段学宁,刘荫华,李挺. 激素受体阳性/人表皮生长因子受体2阴性乳腺癌临床病理特征及预后[J]. 北京大学学报（医学版）, 2022, 54(5): 853-862.
[7]	马珂楠,陈虎,沈妍汝,周永胜,王勇,孙玉春. 选择性激光熔化打印可摘局部义齿圆环形卡环固位力的有限元分析[J]. 北京大学学报（医学版）, 2022, 54(1): 105-112.
[8]	任爽,时会娟,张家豪,刘振龙,邵嘉艺,朱敬先,胡晓青,黄红拾,敖英芳. 前交叉韧带重建术后移植物应力的有限元分析[J]. 北京大学学报（医学版）, 2021, 53(5): 865-870.
[9]	周伟,安金刚,荣起国,张益. 下颌骨颏部骨折联合双侧髁突囊内骨折致伤机制的三维有限元分析[J]. 北京大学学报（医学版）, 2021, 53(5): 983-989.
[10]	肖若陶,刘承,徐楚潇,何为,马潞林. 术前血小板参数与局部进展期肾细胞癌预后[J]. 北京大学学报（医学版）, 2021, 53(4): 647-652.
[11]	姜又升,冯琳,高学军. 垫底材料弹性模量对髓腔固位冠修复后上颌前磨牙应力分布的影响[J]. 北京大学学报（医学版）, 2021, 53(4): 764-769.
[12]	尹祯敏,王子轩,陈俊锴,孙玉春,刘云松,叶红强,周永胜. 可摘局部义齿适合性方法的评价[J]. 北京大学学报（医学版）, 2021, 53(2): 406-412.
[13]	徐啸翔,曹烨,赵一姣,贾璐,谢秋菲. 数字化个齿托盘制取下颌全牙列全冠预备体印模的体外评价[J]. 北京大学学报（医学版）, 2021, 53(1): 54-61.
[14]	于焕斌,伍文杰,吕晓鸣,石妍,郑磊,张建国. ¹²⁵I粒子近距离治疗外放疗后复发唾液腺癌[J]. 北京大学学报（医学版）, 2020, 52(5): 919-923.
[15]	魏菱,邹东,陈虎,潘韶霞,孙玉春,周永胜. 一种数字化全口义齿的临床疗效评价[J]. 北京大学学报（医学版）, 2020, 52(4): 762-770.

Metrics

Viewed

Full text

Abstract

Cited

Shared

Discussed