北京大学学报(医学版) ›› 2016, Vol. 48 ›› Issue (4): 702-708. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1671-167X.2016.04.027

• 论著 • 上一篇    下一篇

基于锥形束CT的强支抗内收上前牙病例牙根及牙槽骨的形态学分析

温馥嘉,陈贵,刘怡△   

  1. (北京大学口腔医学院·口腔医院正畸科口腔数字化医疗技术和材料国家工程实验室口腔数字医学北京市重点实验室, 北京100081)
  • 出版日期:2016-08-18 发布日期:2016-08-18
  • 通讯作者: 刘怡 E-mail:lyortho@163.com
  • 基金资助:

     国家高技术研究发展计划(863计划,2013AA040803)资助

Morphological analysis of roots and alveolar bone changes after upper anterior #br# retraction with maximum anchorage based on cone-beam computed tomography

WEN Fu-jia,CHEN Gui,LIU Yi△   

  1. (Department of Orthodontics, Peking University School and Hospital of Stomatology & National Engineering Laboratory for Digital and Material Technology of Stomatology & Beijing Key Laboratory of Digital Stomatology, Beijing 100081, China)
  • Online:2016-08-18 Published:2016-08-18
  • Contact: LIU Yi E-mail:lyortho@163.com
  • Supported by:

    Supported by the National High Technology Research and Development Program of China(863 Program, 2013AA040803)

摘要:

目的:借助锥形束CT(conebeam computed tomography,CBCT)资料,对成人强支抗内收上前牙病例的牙根及牙槽骨进行形态学分析,以全面了解大范围移动上前牙后,其牙根及牙槽骨的形态学变化。方法: 从就诊于北京大学口腔医院正畸科的患者中选取12例成人(18~40岁)上颌前突病例,在正畸治疗前后拍摄CBCT,利用转化头颅侧位片进行头影测量分析,通过构建治疗前后的矢状截面重叠图和三维重建图定性分析根周牙槽骨的相对变化规律,并定量测量治疗前后的牙根长度、唇腭侧不同水平牙槽骨厚度、唇腭侧及近远中牙槽骨高度。各项指标均由同一操作者重复测量3次取均值,并应用SPSS 17.0软件进行分析。结果: 12例中有6例切牙根周牙槽骨变化以唇侧骨厚度降低[根尖区牙槽骨厚度变化可达(-0.64±1.18) mm]、腭侧骨厚度增加[根尖区牙槽骨厚度变化可达(0.93±2.00)  mm]、牙根少量吸收[(-0.95±0.79) mm]为特征,另6例的切牙根周牙槽骨变化以唇侧骨厚度增加[根尖区牙槽骨厚度变化可达(2.12±1.46) mm]、腭侧骨厚度降低[根尖区牙槽骨厚度变化可达(-2.88±0.58) mm]、牙根大量吸收[(-2.12±1.43) mm]为特征;12例尖牙治疗前后根周牙槽骨变化基本一致,唇侧骨厚度降低[根尖区牙槽骨厚度变化可达(-0.27±1.86) mm],腭侧骨厚度有不同程度增加[根尖区牙槽骨厚度变化可达(6.40±6.00) mm],牙根少量吸收[(-1.12±1.19) mm];所有上前牙治疗后三维方向上牙槽骨高度均不同程度降低,腭侧最为显著。结论: 强支抗内收上前牙病例治疗后,切牙根尖移动量越大,牙根吸收量越大,牙根唇侧牙槽骨相对厚度增加、腭侧相对厚度减少,但整体厚度降低;治疗后上前牙牙槽骨高度普遍降低,并以腭侧最为明显。

关键词: 锥束计算机体层摄影术, 正畸学, 矫正, 牙根, 牙槽骨, 形态学

Abstract:

Objective:To investigate the remodeling of alveolar bone and the changes of roots after anterior retraction with maximum anchorage by analyzing CBCT data from adult cases.Methods: The sample comprised 48 incisors and 24 canines from 12 patients (18 to 40 years of age) with problems of ma-xillary protrusion or upper arch protrusion. CBCT scans were exposed before and after treatment, and la-teral cephalometric images as well as multiple planar reconstruction images were reconstructed. Tracing superimpositions of sagittal sections and three-dimensional reconstructions were done for qualitative analysis. For all maxillary anterior teeth, changes of root length, alveolar bone height and labial-palatal thicknesses at different levels were evaluated. The average of measurements taken by the same tester in three times was processed by SPSS 17.0 statistical package.Results: In 6 of the 12 cases, alveolar thickness became thinner on labial side [apical area: (-0.64±1.18) mm] while thicker on palatal side [apical area: (0.93±2.0) mm] and the root length decreased[(-0.95±0.79) mm]. In the other 6 cases, the incisors’ alveolar bone became thicker on labial side [apical area: (2.12±1.46) mm] while thinner on palatal side [apical area: (-2.88±0.58) mm]and the loss of root length was obvious[(-2.12±1.43) mm]. In all the 12 cases, the canines’ alveolar bone became thinner on labial side especially on the apical level[(-0.27±1.86) mm] while greatly thicker on palatal side [apical area: (6.40±6.00) mm]and the root resorption was slight [(-1.12±1.19) mm]. For all the anterior teeth, the height of alveolar bone reduced around them after retraction.Conclusion: When the root apical moved more palatally, more root resorption would occur and the alveolar bone would get thicker on labial side but thinner on palatal side and thinner as a whole after anterior retraction with maximum anchorage.In the vertical direction, the height of the alveolar bone generally decreased on all sides and decreased the most on the palatal side.

Key words: Cone-beam computed tomography, Orthodontics, corrective, Tooth root, Alveolar bone, Morphology

中图分类号: 

  • R783.5
[1] 吕梁,张铭津,温奧楠,赵一姣,王勇,李晶,杨庚辰,柳大为. 应用三维软组织空间线角模板法评价颏部对称性[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2024, 56(1): 106-110.
[2] 凌晓彤,屈留洋,郑丹妮,杨静,闫雪冰,柳登高,高岩. 牙源性钙化囊肿与牙源性钙化上皮瘤的三维影像特点[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2024, 56(1): 131-137.
[3] 段登辉,WANGHom-Lay,王恩博. 可吸收胶原膜在颊侧袋形瓣引导性骨再生手术中的作用: 一项回顾性影像学队列研究[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2023, 55(6): 1097-1104.
[4] 代云飞,刘鹤,彭楚芳,姜玺军. 年轻恒牙牙髓再生治疗术后36个月的临床疗效评估[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2023, 55(4): 729-735.
[5] 雷玥,杨颖婷,雷海华. 异位萌出诱导矫治器在第一恒磨牙异位萌出治疗中的应用[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2023, 55(4): 766-封三.
[6] 章锦花,潘洁,孙志鹏,王霄. 不同根管内容物对口腔颌面锥形束CT诊断牙根纵裂准确性的影响[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2023, 55(2): 333-338.
[7] 高娟,吕航苗,马慧敏,赵一姣,李小彤. 锥形束CT三维体积测量评估骨性Ⅲ类错正畸正颌治疗后的牙根吸收[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2022, 54(4): 719-726.
[8] 杨刚,胡文杰,曹洁,柳登高. 牙周健康的上颌前牙唇侧嵴顶上牙龈的三维形态分析[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2021, 53(5): 990-994.
[9] 王思雯,尤鹏越,刘玉华,王新知,唐琳,王梅. 两种可吸收生物膜联合去蛋白牛骨基质植入犬拔牙窝成骨的影像学评价[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2021, 53(2): 364-370.
[10] 杨雨卉,黄一平,李巍然. 骨皮质切开加速正畸牙齿移动对牙根吸收的影响[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2021, 53(2): 434-437.
[11] 高璐,谷岩. 中国人群腭中缝形态特点分期与Demirjian牙龄的相关性[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2021, 53(1): 133-138.
[12] 刘建,王宪娥,吕达,乔敏,张立,孟焕新,徐莉,毛铭馨. 广泛型侵袭性牙周炎患者牙根形态异常与相关致病基因的关联[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2021, 53(1): 16-23.
[13] 王高南,焦剑,周彦恒,施捷. 正畸牙齿位置的移动对角化龈宽度的影响[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2019, 51(5): 931-936.
[14] 刘鑫,张静,王晔,张贺军,丁士刚,周丽雅. 早期胃癌白光内镜下特征分析[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2019, 51(2): 302-306.
[15] 谢晓艳,贾淑梅,孙志辉,张祖燕. 分辨率设置与锥形束CT检测牙根外吸收的可靠性[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2019, 51(1): 75-79.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!