全冠预备体终止线局部扫描正确度对整体的影响

doi:10.19723/j.issn.1671-167X.2021.01.016

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

目的: 探讨影响数字化印模中全冠预备体终止线扫描正确度的因素。方法: 在树脂牙列模型上制备右上第一磨牙标准全冠预备体,分别进行牙列内全冠预备体和孤立全冠预备体终止线的扫描正确度检测。牙列内全冠预备体终止线的扫描正确度检测:(1)应用Imetric扫描仪扫描全冠预备体,获得STL格式数据作为参考真值;(2)应用 CEREC Omnicam口内扫描仪和3Shape TRIOS口内扫描仪扫描全冠预备体,同一操作者重复6次,获得STL格式数据,将Imetric扫描仪、CEREC Omnicam口内扫描仪和3Shape TRIOS口内扫描仪的扫描数据导入Geomagic Studio 2013软件中,提取全冠预备体整体终止线和局部终止线(近、远中和颊、舌侧)图像及数据,与Imetric扫描仪参考真值进行3D偏差分析,输出配准数据间的均方根误差(root mean square,RMS)值作为扫描正确度评价指标,RMS值越大,正确度越低。应用SPSS软件进行独立样本t检验,对CEREC Omnicam口内扫描仪和3Shape TRIOS扫描仪的全冠预备体终止线RMS值进行比较,并分析各部位终止线RMS值与整体终止线的关系。孤立全冠预备体终止线的扫描正确度检测:(1)去除预备体前后邻牙,建立孤立全冠预备体模型;(2)应用CEREC Omnicam口内扫描仪和3Shape TRIOS口内扫描仪扫描全冠预备体,同一操作者重复6次,数据采集和分析同牙列内全冠预备体终止线的扫描正确度检测。结果: 在完整牙列内,(1)CEREC Omnicam口内扫描仪扫描全冠预备体整体终止线的RMS值[(44±7) μm]大于3Shape TRIOS口内扫描仪[(35±6) μm](P<0.05);(2)CEREC Omnicam口内扫描仪扫描全冠预备体远中终止线的RMS值[(63±7) μm]最大(P<0.05), 近中RMS值[(45±9) μm]大于颊侧[(38±3) μm]和舌侧[(40±3) μm],但差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。3Shape TRIOS口内扫描仪扫描近、远中终止线的RMS值分别为[(45±8) μm]和[(50±10) μm],均显著高于颊侧[(33±8) μm]、舌侧[(33±6) μm](P<0.05)。CEREC Omnicam口内扫描仪扫描远中终止线的RMS值大于3Shape TRIOS口内扫描仪(P<0.05)。无邻牙时,(1)CEREC Omnicam口内扫描仪和3Shape TRIOS口内扫描仪扫描整体终止线的RMS值均明显减小(P<0.05),其中CEREC Omnicam口内扫描仪(34±3) μm,3Shape TRIOS口内扫描仪(26±4) μm;(2)CEREC Omnicam口内扫描仪和3Shape TRIOS口内扫描仪扫描近中终止线的RMS值明显减小,且两者间差异无统计学意义(P>0.05),其中CEREC Omnicam口内扫描仪(32±8) μm,3Shape TRIOS口内扫描仪(32±6) μm。CEREC Omnicam口内扫描仪和3Shape TRIOS口内扫描仪扫描远中终止线的RMS值也明显减小(P<0.05), CEREC Omnicam口内扫描仪[(38±3) μm]减小幅度更大,与3Shape TRIOS口内扫描仪[(36±1) μm]相近(P>0.05)。CEREC Omnicam口内扫描仪和3Shape TRIOS口内扫描仪扫描颊侧、舌侧终止线的RMS值无明显变化(P>0.05), 其中CEREC Omnicam口内扫描仪颊侧(44±7) μm、舌侧(43±3) μm,3Shape TRIOS口内扫描仪颊侧(29±5) μm、舌侧(40±7) μm。结论: 邻牙会影响口内扫描仪对全冠预备体近、远中局部终止线的扫描正确度,从而降低整体终止线的正确度。

关键词: 口内扫描仪, 正确度, 预备体, 终止线

Abstract:

Objective: To investigate the factors affecting the trueness of finish lines of full crown preparations in digital impressions.Methods: A full crown preparation of the right maxillary molar was prepared on the standard resin dentition model, the trueness of the finish lines, the full crown preparation in the whole dentition and the isolated full crown preparation were measured respectively. Detection of scanning trueness of the finish lines of the full crown preparation in the whole dentition: (1) Using Imetric scanner to scan the full crown preparation, obtaining STL (Stereo lithographic) format data as the reference true value; (2) Using CEREC Omnicam oral scanner and 3Shape TRIOS oral scanner to scan the full crown preparation, obtaining all the STL format data, import Geomagic Studio 2013 software, extraction of images and data of the complete finish lines or local finish lines (mesial, distal, buccal, lingual) of the full crown preparation, then using the data to 3D Compare Analysis with the reference true value, outputting RMS (root mean square) values which could evaluate the scanning trueness, the lower RMS value was, the lower the trueness was. The detection of scanning trueness of the finish lines of the isolated full crown preparation: (1) the anterior and posterior adjacent teeth of the preparation were removed to establish the model of the isolated full crown preparation; (2) CEREC Omnicam oral scanner and 3Shape TRIOS oral scanner were used to scan the isolated preparations, and each group was repeated 6 times. Data collection and analysis were the same as the first part, that is, detection of scanning trueness of finish lines of the full crown preparation in the whole dentition.Results: In the whole dentition, (1) the RMS value [(44±7) μm] of CEREC Omnicam oral scanner scanning complete finish lines was greater than that of 3Shape TRIOS oral scanner [(35±6) μm](P<0.05). (2) the RMS values of the mesial [(45±9) μm], buccal [(38±3) μm] and lingual [(40±3) μm] finish lines in CEREC Omnicam oral scanner scanning were all lower than that in distal [(63±7) μm](P<0.05), and the RMS values in mesial were higher than that in buccal and lingual (P>0.05). The RMS values of 3Shape TRIOS oral scanner scanning mesial and distal finish lines were significantly higher than those of the buccal and lingual side (P>0.05), in which:(45±8) μm in mesial, (50±10) μm in the distal, (33±8) μm in the buccal and (33±6) μm in the lingual side. The RMS value of CEREC Omnicam oral scanner scanning distal finish line was greater than that of 3Shape TRIOS oral scanner (P<0.05). Without adjacent teeth, (1) the RMS values of the complete finish lines of CEREC Omnicam oral scanner and 3 Shape TRIOS oral scanner were significantly reduced (P<0.05), including CEREC Omnicam oral scanner (34±3) μm and 3 Shape TRIOS oral scanner (26±4) μm; (2) the RMS values of the buccal and lingual finish lines of CEREC Omnicam oral scanner and 3Shape TRIOS oral scanner showed no significant changes (P>0.05), among which, CEREC Omnicam oral scanner buccal (44±7) μm, lingual (43±3) μm, 3Shape TRIOS oral scanner buccal (29±5) μm, lingual (40±7) μm. The RMS values of CEREC Omnicam oral scanner and 3Shape TRIOS oral scanner were significantly reduced and there was no significant difference between them (P>0.05). CEREC Omnicam oral scanner (32±8) μm and 3Shape TRIOS oral scanner (32±6) μm. The RMS values of the distal finish lines of CEREC Omnicam oral scanner and 3 Shape TRIOS oral scanner also decreased significantly (P<0.05), and CEREC Omnicam oral scanner (38±3) μm decreased more significantly, similar to 3Shape TRIOS oral scanner (36±1) μm, P>0.05.Conclusion: When adjacent teeth exist in the full crown preparation, the mesial and distal parts of the finish line will be blocked by adjacent teeth, which will affect the trueness of the local finish line, and ultimately reduce the trueness of the complete finish line.

Key words: Intraoral scanners, Trueness, Preparation, Finish line

中图分类号:

R782.1

姜楠,包旭东,岳林. 全冠预备体终止线局部扫描正确度对整体的影响[J]. 北京大学学报（医学版）, 2021, 53(1): 102-108.

JIANG Nan,BAO Xu-dong,YUE Lin. Influence of trueness for local finish lines of a full crown preparation on that of complete finish line[J]. Journal of Peking University (Health Sciences), 2021, 53(1): 102-108.

图/表 7

图1

图2

图3

图4

表1

表2

表3

参考文献 12

[1]	Logozzo S, Zanetti EM, Franceschini G, et al. Recent advances in dental optics: Part I. 3D intraoral scanners for restorative dentistry[J]. Opt Laser Eng, 2014,54(3):203-221. doi: 10.1016/j.optlaseng.2013.07.017
[2]	王勇. 口内数字印模技术[J]. 口腔医学, 2015,35(9):705-709, 743.
[3]	张馨月, 李虹, 赵一姣, 等. 两种结构光口内三维扫描仪获取单冠预备体数据质量的模型评价[J]. 中华口腔医学杂志, 2016,51(7):432-436.
[4]	Mangano F, Gandolfi A, Luongo G, et al. Intraoral scanners in dentistry: a review of the current literature[J]. BMC Oral Health, 2017,17(1):1-11. doi: 10.1186/s12903-016-0228-6 pmid: 27412290
[5]	Lee JJ, Jeong ID, Park JY, et al. Accuracy of single-abutment digital cast obtained using intraoral and cast scanners[J]. J Prosthet Dent, 2016,117(2):253-259. doi: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2016.07.021 pmid: 27666500
[6]	Mou SH, Chai T, Wang JS, et al. Influence of different convergence angles and tooth preparation heights on the internal adaptation of Cerec crowns[J]. J Prosthet Dent, 2002,87(3):248-255. doi: 10.1067/mpr.2002.122011 pmid: 11941350
[7]	Nedelcu R, Olsson P, Nyström I, et al. Finish line distinctness and accuracy in 7 intraoral scanners versus conventional impression: an in vitro descriptive comparison[J]. BMC Oral Health, 2018,18(1):1-11. doi: 10.1186/s12903-017-0444-8 pmid: 29301577
[8]	Sim J, Jang Y, Kim W, et al. Comparing the accuracy (trueness and precision) of models of fixed dental prostheses fabricated by digital and conventional workflows[J]. J Prosthodont Res, 2019,63(1):25-30. doi: 10.1016/j.jpor.2018.02.002 pmid: 29615324
[9]	Re D, Cerutti F, Augusti G, et al. Comparison of marginal fit of Lava CAD/CAM crown-copings with two finish lines[J]. Int J Esthet Dent, 2014,9(3):426-435. pmid: 25126621
[10]	Schaefer O, Watts DC, Sigusch BW, et al. Marginal and internal fit of pressed lithium disilicate partial crowns in vitro: A three-dimensional analysis of accuracy and reproducibility[J]. Dental Materials, 2012,28(3):320-326. doi: 10.1016/j.dental.2011.12.008
[11]	药学与临床研究编辑部. 如何正确运用组内相关系数进行一致性检验: 药物研究中的统计学(一)[J]. 药学与临床研究, 2018,26(1):7-8.
[12]	赵一姣, 王勇. 从工程技术角度谈口腔医学椅旁数字化技术[J]. 中华口腔医学杂志, 2018,53(4):230-235.

相关文章 15

[1]	李穗,马雯洁,王时敏,丁茜,孙瑶,张磊. 上前牙种植单冠修复体切导的数字化设计正确度[J]. 北京大学学报（医学版）, 2024, 56(1): 81-87.
[2]	刘晓强,周寅. 牙种植同期植骨术围术期高血压的相关危险因素[J]. 北京大学学报（医学版）, 2024, 56(1): 93-98.
[3]	段登辉,WANGHom-Lay,王恩博. 可吸收胶原膜在颊侧袋形瓣引导性骨再生手术中的作用: 一项回顾性影像学队列研究[J]. 北京大学学报（医学版）, 2023, 55(6): 1097-1104.
[4]	甄敏,孟焕新,胡文杰,武登诚,危伊萍. 改良牙冠延长术后组织愈合的动物实验研究[J]. 北京大学学报（医学版）, 2022, 54(5): 927-935.
[5]	姜又升,冯琳,高学军. 垫底材料弹性模量对髓腔固位冠修复后上颌前磨牙应力分布的影响[J]. 北京大学学报（医学版）, 2021, 53(4): 764-769.
[6]	黄丽东,宫玮玉,董艳梅. 生物活性玻璃对人脐静脉血管内皮细胞增殖及成血管的作用[J]. 北京大学学报（医学版）, 2021, 53(2): 371-377.
[7]	王思雯,尤鹏越,刘玉华,王新知,唐琳,王梅. 两种可吸收生物膜联合去蛋白牛骨基质植入犬拔牙窝成骨的影像学评价[J]. 北京大学学报（医学版）, 2021, 53(2): 364-370.
[8]	段登辉,王恩博,崔念晖,翟新利,刘宇,孟娟红,张伟,张益. 下颌阻生智齿拔除手术的可预期微创化[J]. 北京大学学报（医学版）, 2020, 52(2): 395-403.
[9]	曹畅,王菲,王恩博,刘宇. β-磷酸三钙用于下颌第三磨牙拔除术后骨缺损修复的自身对照研究[J]. 北京大学学报（医学版）, 2020, 52(1): 97-102.
[10]	王倩,李丹,唐志辉. 上颌窦底内提升术同期种植窦内成骨的临床效果[J]. 北京大学学报（医学版）, 2019, 51(5): 925-930.
[11]	齐伟,李健男,赵静仁,邢海霞,潘洁. 角形切口设计和愈合方式与下颌阻生智齿拔除术后并发症[J]. 北京大学学报（医学版）, 2019, 51(5): 949-953.
[12]	赵丽萍,胡文杰,徐涛,詹雅琳,危伊萍,甄敏,王翠. 罹患重度牙周病变磨牙拔牙后两种牙槽嵴保存方法的比较[J]. 北京大学学报（医学版）, 2019, 51(3): 579-585.
[13]	王晶,陈俊鹏,王洋,许向亮,郭传瑸. 数字化下颌运动记录及咀嚼肌肌电图在下颌骨肿瘤患者口颌功能评价中的应用[J]. 北京大学学报（医学版）, 2019, 51(3): 571-578.
[14]	张智勇,孟甜,陈全,刘文曙,陈宇寰. 种植体早期失败病例回顾性分析[J]. 北京大学学报（医学版）, 2018, 50(6): 1088-1091.
[15]	吴敏节，邹立东，梁峰. 上前牙即刻种植即刻修复负载3年后软、硬组织变化的临床观察[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2018, 50(4): 694-699.

Metrics

Viewed

Full text

374

HTML			PDF

Just accepted	Online first	Issue	Just accepted	Online first	Issue
0	0	13	0	0	361

From	Others	local

Times	102	272
Rate	27%	73%

Abstract

919

Just accepted	Online first	Issue

0	0	919

From	Others	local

Times	912	7
Rate	99%	1%

Cited

Web of Science	Crossref	ScienceDirect	Search for Citations in Google Scholar >>


This page requires you have already subscribed to WoS.

Shared

Discussed

Site	Scanner type		t	P
Site	CEREC Omnicam oral scanner	3Shape TRIOS oral scanner	t	P
Mesial/μm	45±9	45±8	-0.36	0.74
Distal/μm	63±7	50±10	3.63	0.02
Buccal/μm	38±3	33±8	1.14	0.34
Lingual/μm	40±3	33±6	2.11	0.10
F	17.57	5.83
P	<0.001	0.010

Preparation position	CEREC Omnicam oral scanner	3Shape TRIOS oral scanner
Preparation in the dentition/μm	44±7	35±6
Isolated preparation/μm	34±3	26±4
t	2.37	3.49
P	0.04	0.02

Site	CEREC Omnicam oral scanner				3Shape TRIOS oral scanner
Site	Preparation in the dentition	Isolated preparation	t	P	Preparation in the dentition	Isolated preparation	t	P
Mesial/μm	45±9	32±8	2.92	0.04	45±8	32±6	3.30	<0.05
Distal/μm	63±7	38±3	6.61	0.01	50±10	36±1	3.50	0.04
Buccal/μm	38±3	44±7	-1.49	0.23	33±8	29±5	0.47	0.67
Lingual/μm	40±3	43±3	-2.60	0.08	33±6	40±7	-1.01	0.39