北京大学学报(医学版) ›› 2022, Vol. 54 ›› Issue (1): 100-104. doi: 10.19723/j.issn.1671-167X.2022.01.016

• 论著 • 上一篇    下一篇

应用Delphi法构建下颌阻生第三磨牙拔除难度评分量表

陈震,谷宝鑫,汤玉芳,闫子玉,倪方端,崔念晖()   

  1. 北京大学口腔医学院·口腔医院口腔颌面外科,国家口腔医学中心,国家口腔疾病临床医学研究中心,口腔数字化医疗技术和材料国家工程实验室,口腔数字医学北京市重点实验室,国家卫生健康委员会口腔医学计算机应用工程技术研究中心,国家药品监督管理局口腔生物材料重点实验室,北京 100081
  • 收稿日期:2021-10-11 出版日期:2022-02-18 发布日期:2022-02-21
  • 通讯作者: 崔念晖 E-mail:kqcuinianhui@bjmu.edu.cn
  • 基金资助:
    北京大学口腔医院新技术新疗法项目(PKUSSNCT-20B09)

Constructions of the scale of difficulty in the extraction of impacted mandibular third molars by using Delphi method

CHEN Zhen,GU Bao-xin,TANG Yu-fang,YAN Zi-yu,NI Fang-duan,CUI Nian-hui()   

  1. Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Peking University School and Hospital of Stomatology & National Center of Stomatology & National Clinical Research Center for Oral Diseases & National Engineering Laboratory for Digital and Material Technology of Stomatology & Beijing Key Laboratory of Digital Stomatology & NHC Research Center of Engineering and Technology for Computerized Dentistry & NMPA Key Laboratory for Dental Materials, Beijing 100081, China
  • Received:2021-10-11 Online:2022-02-18 Published:2022-02-21
  • Contact: Nian-hui CUI E-mail:kqcuinianhui@bjmu.edu.cn
  • Supported by:
    Program for New Clinical Techniques and Therapies of Peking University School and Hospital of Stomatology(PKUSSNCT-20B09)

RICH HTML

  

摘要:

目的: 评估影响下颌阻生第三磨牙拔除难度的相关指标,对不同操作和风险指标进行难度评分,构建出直观且准确的下颌阻生第三磨牙拔除难度评分量表,以期帮助医生在术前对手术难度进行更加准确的分析与预测。方法: 以文献和临床回顾为基础,汇总拔牙难度指标。首先由10位来自北京大学口腔医院长期从事牙槽外科专业工作的医师组建专家名义小组,以面对面发放问卷的形式,请专家对汇总的拔牙难度指标是否需要保留进行打分,经商议后形成评估下颌阻生第三磨牙拔除难度一、二级条目框架;再采用Delphi专家咨询法通过电子邮件的方式向30名Delphi专家发送问卷,经过两轮打分及修改,形成下颌阻生第三磨牙拔除难度评分量表。结果: 两轮问卷回收率均为100.0%,即专家的积极系数(Cj)均为100%;两轮Delphi专家咨询的权威系数(Cr)为0.92,说明结果具有一定代表性和权威性;经过两轮打分及修改,专家打分变异系数(CV)变小,意见协调系数(W)升高,均有统计学显著意义[第一轮CV为0.24,W为0.56(P<0.001);第二轮CV为0.19,W为0.72(P<0.001)],说明专家意见有较好的趋同性。最终形成含有12个一级指标和37个二级指标的下颌阻生第三磨牙拔除难度评分量表,包含操作难度指标项、风险难度指标项和共同难度指标项。结论: 在进行全面文献检索的基础上,提出下颌阻生第三磨牙拔除难度由操作难度和风险难度共同构成的观点,采用Delphi专家咨询法,将专家长期的临床经验、专业知识转化成量化指标,作为拔牙难度预测的评分量表,具有一定的代表性和权威性。

关键词: 下颌阻生第三磨牙, 牙拔除术, 难度评估, Delphi专家咨询法

Abstract:

Objective: To evaluate the relevant indicators affecting difficulty in the extraction of impacted mandibular third molars and score difficulty of different operation and risk indicators, so as to build an intuitive and accurate scale to help operators make more accurate analysis and prediction of difficulty before the operation. Methods: Based on literature and the clinical review, the difficulty indicators of tooth extraction were summarized. Firstly, 10 doctors from Peking University School and Hospital of Stomatology who had been engaged in alveolar surgery for a long time established an expert nominal group, and then rated whether the summarized indicators needed to be retained in the form of face-to-face questionnaires. A level 1 and 2 item frame for evaluating difficulty in the tooth extraction was formed after discussion; Then Delphi method was used to send a questionnaire to 30 experts by e-mail. After two rounds of scoring and modification, the scale of difficulty in the extraction of impacted mandibular third molars was formed. Results: The recycling rate of two rounds of questionnaires was 100.0%,which showed that the experts were very enthusiastic about the study; The authority coefficients (Cr) of the two rounds of Delphi expert consultation were both 0.92, which showed that the results were representative and authoritative. After two rounds of grading and revision, the variable coefficient (CV) decreased and the Kendall’s concordance coefficient (W) increased, which were statistically significant: In the first round, the CV was 0.24 and W was 0.56 (P<0.001), and in the second, the CV was 0.19 and W was 0.72 (P<0.001), which indicated that there was a good convergence among the expert opinions. Finally, a scale of difficulty in the tooth extraction containing 12 items at level A and 37 items at level B was formed, including operation difficulty indicators, risk difficulty indicators and common difficulty indicators. Conclusion: Based on comprehensive literature retrieval, the study has put forward the concept that difficulty in the extraction of impacted mandibular third molars is composed of operation difficulty and risk difficulty. Using Delphi method, the long-term clinical experience and professional knowledge of experts are transformed into quantitative indicators as a scoring scale. The scale has certain representativeness and authority.

Key words: Impacted mandibular third molars, Tooth extraction, The scale of difficulty, Delphi method

中图分类号: 

  • R782

表1

专家名义小组基本情况"

Basic information Items Number
Gender Male 6
Female 4
Age/years 31-40 1
41-49 3
≥50 6
Years of clinical work 10-15 1
15-20 3
≥20 6
Final degree Bachelor 1
Master 0
Doctor 9
Professional title Attending physician 1
Associate
chief physician
4
Chief physician 5

表2

Delphi专家咨询组基本情况"

Basic information Items Number
Age/years 31-40 9
41-50 11
>50 10
Years of clinical work 5-10 5
11-15 5
16-20 6
>20 14
Final degree Bachelor 4
Master 5
Doctor 21
Professional title Attending physician 8
Associate
chief physician
13
Chief physician 9
Research direction Alveolar surgery 22
Oral and maxillofacial surgery 5
Others 3
[1] Sanchez-Torres A, Soler-Capdevila J, Ustrell-Barral M, et al. Patient, radiological, and operative factors associated with surgical difficulty in the extraction of third molars: A systematic review[J]. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg, 2020, 49(5):655-665.
doi: 10.1016/j.ijom.2019.10.009
[2] Montserrat-Bosch M, Figueiredo R, Nogueira-Magalhaes P, et al. Efficacy and complications associated with a modified inferior alveolar nerve block technique. A randomized, triple-blind clinical trial[J]. Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal, 2014, 19(4):E391-E397.
[3] Sigron G, Pourmand P, Mache B, et al. The most common complications after wisdom-tooth removal: Part 1: A retrospective study of 1 199 cases in the mandible[J]. Swiss Dent J, 2014, 124(10):1042-1046, 1052.
pmid: 25342545
[4] 赵珺如, 刘乙澍, 崔念晖. 下颌第三磨牙拔除术后并发双侧广泛性皮下气肿及纵隔气肿1例报告[J]. 中国实用口腔科杂志, 2021, 14(2):253-256.
[5] Diniz-Freitas M, Lago-Mendez L, Gude-Sampedro F, et al. Pederson scale fails to predict how difficult it will be to extract lower third molars[J]. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg, 2007, 45(1):23-26.
doi: 10.1016/j.bjoms.2005.12.004
[6] Al-Samman AA. Evaluation of Kharma scale as a predictor of lower third molar extraction difficulty[J]. Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal, 2017, 22(6):e796-e799.
[7] Zhang X, Wang L, Gao Z, et al. Development of a new index to assess the difficulty level of surgical removal of impacted mandibular third molars in an Asian population[J/OL]. J Oral Maxillofac Surg, 2019, 77(7): 1358.e1-1351.e8 [2021-10-01]. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/30959010/ .
[8] 王芷乔. 应用德尔菲法确立甲状腺癌中医证候及分型指标的调查研究[D]. 北京中医药大学, 2016.
[9] Humphrey-Murto S, Varpio L, Gonsalves C, et al. Using consensus group methods such as Delphi and Nominal Group in medical education research[J]. Med Teach, 2017, 39(1):14-19.
doi: 10.1080/0142159X.2017.1245856 pmid: 27841062
[10] 史静琤, 莫显昆, 孙振球. 量表编制中内容效度指数的应用[J]. 中南大学学报(医学版), 2012, 37(2):49-52.
[11] Lakhani A, Watling DP, Zeeman H, et al. Nominal group technique for individuals with cognitive disability: A systematic review[J]. Disabil Rehabil, 2018, 40(18):2105-2115.
doi: 10.1080/09638288.2017.1325946 pmid: 28503963
[12] 王青, 朱晓丹, 常茹, 等. 基于德尔菲专家咨询法构建稳定期精神分裂症康复方案的研究[J]. 现代医药卫生, 2021, 37(14):2357-2361.
[13] Sutherland K, Yeung W, Mak Y, et al. Envisioning the future of clinical analytics: A modified Delphi process in New South Wales, Australia[J]. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak, 2020, 20(1):210.
doi: 10.1186/s12911-020-01226-7
[14] Langmack KA, Newton LA, Jordan S, et al. Cone beam CT dose reduction in prostate radiotherapy using Likert scale methods [J/OL]. Br J Radiol, 2016, 89: 20150460 [2021-10-01]. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/26689092/ .
[15] Wu C, Wu P, Li P, et al. Construction of an index system of core competence assessment for infectious disease specialist nurse in China: A Delphi study[J]. BMC Infect Dis, 2021, 21(1):791.
doi: 10.1186/s12879-021-06402-2
[16] Niederberger M, Spranger J. Delphi technique in health sciences: A map[J]. Front Public Health, 2020, 8:457.
doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2020.00457 pmid: 33072683
[17] Nasa P, Jain R, Juneja D. Delphi methodology in healthcare research: How to decide its appropriateness[J]. World J Methodol, 2021, 11(4):116-129.
[18] Jiang F, Liu T, Zhou H, et al. Developing medical record-based, healthcare quality indicators for psychiatric hospitals in China: A modified Delphi-analytic hierarchy process study[J]. Int J Qual Health Care, 2019, 31(10):733-740.
doi: 10.1093/intqhc/mzz005 pmid: 30753601
[19] Carvalho RF, Vasconcelos BC. Pernambuco index: Predictability of the complexity of surgery for impacted lower third molars[J]. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg, 2018, 47(2):234.
doi: 10.1016/j.ijom.2017.07.013
[20] 史嘉昕. 下颌第三磨牙拔除时间的多因素相关分析及预测模型建立[D]. 天津医科大学, 2020.
[1] 李峥, 吕珑薇, 张晓, 夏丹丹, 张萍, 刘云松, 周永胜. 基于干细胞和生物材料调控的口腔颅颌面骨再生的研究进展[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2026, 58(2): 272-277.
[2] 张晗, 杨馥嘉, 杨瑞莉. 干细胞功能调控在颅颌面组织再生修复中的研究进展[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2026, 58(2): 285-289.
[3] FarinEbrahimi, 冯志强, FarazEbrahimi, 韩玮华, 于子杨, 贾宽宽, 安金刚. 上颌药物相关性颌骨坏死的不同分期手术治疗效果[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2026, 58(1): 107-114.
[4] 于录, 吴灵, 刘筱菁, 李自力. 基于数据库相似性检索的正颌外科手术规划技术流程可行性研究: 随机对照试验[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2026, 58(1): 145-152.
[5] 王月, 梁宇红. 繁茂型牙骨质-骨结构不良1例[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2026, 58(1): 220-224.
[6] 张斯巧, 刘建, 徐涛, 胡文杰, 张浩筠, 危伊萍. 异种骨与人工合成骨在磨牙拔牙同期微翻瓣牙槽嵴保存术中的临床效果比较[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2026, 58(1): 74-83.
[7] 于子杨, 郭厚佐, 蒋析, 韩玮华, 林野. 穿颧种植体上颌窦段成骨的影像学研究[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2025, 57(5): 967-974.
[8] 宋凤岐, 徐心雨, 刘筱菁, 李自力. 上颌骨前部和整体顺时针旋转改善骨性Ⅲ类牙颌面畸形患者鼻旁凹陷的对比[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2025, 57(5): 980-988.
[9] 肖宇嘉, 毛渤淳, 周彦恒. 姿势性微笑的三维形态学研究[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2025, 57(5): 989-995.
[10] 杨源源, 张珊珊, 俞光岩, 杨辉俊, 杨宏宇. 部分下颌下腺切除术治疗下颌下腺良性肿瘤的临床效果[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2025, 57(2): 334-339.
[11] 仇师禹, 练洋, 康一帆, 张雷, 蔡义望, 单小峰, 蔡志刚. 基于下颌骨数据库和全连接神经网络的三维检索模型辅助下的下颌骨个性化重建[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2025, 57(2): 360-368.
[12] 杨菊, 刘玥, 曲春娜, 孙健斌, 李天英, 石连杰. 双膦酸盐相关性颌骨坏死1例[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2025, 57(2): 388-392.
[13] 王菲, 张馨月, 刘木清, 王恩博, 段登辉. 顺牙长轴拔牙法在下颌近中与水平智齿拔除术中的应用及三维有限元分析[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2025, 57(1): 106-112.
[14] 吴灵, 方嘉琨, 刘筱菁, 李自力, 李阳, 王晓霞. 基于牙颌面畸形患者三维颅面特征相似性度量模型的建立及评估[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2025, 57(1): 128-135.
[15] 方媛媛, 徐帆, 雷杰, 张昊, 张文宇, 孙宇, 吴宏新, 傅开元, 毛伟玉. 基于颞下颌关节紊乱病诊断标准的临床自动诊断系统的建立及验证[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2025, 57(1): 192-201.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!