北京大学学报(医学版) ›› 2023, Vol. 55 ›› Issue (2): 262-269. doi: 10.19723/j.issn.1671-167X.2023.02.009
赖玉梅1,李忠武1,*(),李欢2,吴艳1,时云飞1,周立新1,楼雨彤1,崔传亮3
Yu-mei LAI1,Zhong-wu LI1,*(),Huan LI2,Yan WU1,Yun-fei SHI1,Li-xin ZHOU1,Yu-tong LOU1,Chuan-liang CUI3
摘要:
目的: 总结肛管直肠黏膜黑色素瘤(anorectal mucosal melanoma, ARMM)的临床病理特征, 分析其预后相关因素。方法: 回顾性分析2010—2018年北京大学肿瘤医院收治的原发性ARMM手术切除标本共68例, 复阅病理切片评估病理特征, 分期采用Slingluff分期法。结果: (1) 临床特征: 患者诊断时中位年龄61.5岁, 男女比例1 ∶1.62, 首发临床表现最常见的是便血(49例); 肿瘤部位最常见的是肛管直肠(66.2%), 其次为直肠(20.6%); 诊断时分期为Ⅰ期28例(局限期, 41.2%), Ⅱ期25例(区域淋巴结转移期, 36.8%), Ⅲ期15例(远处转移期, 22.1%); 5例行局部扩大切除术, 其余为腹会阴联合切除术, 48例术后接受了辅助治疗。(2)病理特征: 大体检查88.2%为隆起型肿块, 肿瘤中位最大径3.5 cm, 中位厚度1.25 cm, 黏膜肌以下浸润深度0~5.00 cm(中位1.00 cm); 肿瘤浸润达固有肌层者27例, 达肠周脂肪组织者16例; 67.6%为无色素性或色素不明显; 细胞形态最常见的是上皮样(45例, 66.2%); 89.7%有溃疡形成, 35.3%可见坏死, 55.9%有血管淋巴管侵犯, 30.9%有神经周围侵犯, 核分裂象计数中位值18/mm2; 免疫组织化学检测S100、HMB-45和Melan-A阳性率分别为92.0%、92.6%、98.0%, Ki-67增殖指数中位值50%;53例进行了CKIT、BRAF及NRAS基因突变检测, 突变率分别为17.0%(9例), 3.8%(2例), 9.4%(5例)。(3)预后: 66例患者获得了随访资料, 中位随访17个月, 中位生存时间17.4个月, 1年、2年、5年的总生存率分别为76.8%、36.8%、17.2%;诊断时淋巴结转移率56.3%;49例(84.5%)发生了远隔部位转移, 最常见的转移部位是肝; 单因素分析显示, 肿瘤最大径(>3.5 cm)、黏膜肌以下浸润深度(>1.0 cm)、坏死、血管淋巴管侵犯、BRAF基因突变、术后未行辅助治疗、肿瘤浸润层次深、诊断时分期晚均为总生存期的预后不良因素; 多因素分析显示, 血管淋巴管侵犯、BRAF基因突变为影响总生存期的独立危险因素, 诊断时分期相关的P值接近临界值。结论: ARMM患者的总体预后差, 血管淋巴管侵犯、BRAF基因突变是独立的预后不良因素; Slingluff分期法可以有效提示预后, 诊断时应详尽评估病理特征, 明确分期, 并尽可能做基因检测; 肿瘤黏膜肌以下的浸润深度可能是比肿瘤厚度更好的预后指标。
中图分类号:
1 |
Heppt MV , Roesch A , Weide B , et al. Prognostic factors and treatment outcomes in 444 patients with mucosal melanoma[J]. Eur J Cancer, 2017, 81, 36- 44.
doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2017.05.014 |
2 |
Schaefer T , Satzger I , Gutzmer R . Clinics, prognosis and new therapeutic options in patients with mucosal melanoma: A retrospective analysis of 75 patients[J]. Medicine (Baltimore), 2017, 96 (1): e5753.
doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000005753 |
3 |
Singer M , Mutch MG . Anal melanoma[J]. Clin Colon Rectal Surg, 2006, 19 (2): 78- 87.
doi: 10.1055/s-2006-942348 |
4 |
Sarac E , Amaral T , Keim U , et al. Prognostic factors in 161 patients with mucosal melanoma: A study of German Central Malignant Melanoma Registry[J]. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol, 2020, 34 (9): 2021- 2025.
doi: 10.1111/jdv.16306 |
5 |
Ren M , Lu Y , Lv J , et al. Prognostic factors in primary anorectal melanoma: A clinicopathological study of 60 cases in China[J]. Hum Pathol, 2018, 79, 77- 85.
doi: 10.1016/j.humpath.2018.05.004 |
6 |
黄书亮, 王晓童, 张红莺. 肛管直肠恶性黑色素瘤的临床病理特征分析[J]. 中国肿瘤外科杂志, 2021, 13 (2): 167- 171.
doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1674-4136.2021.02.013 |
7 |
刘丽男, 李奕. 肛管直肠恶性黑色素瘤52例临床病理分析[J]. 中国误诊学杂志, 2008, 8 (10): 2435- 2436.
doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1009-6647.2008.10.160 |
8 |
Li H , Yang L , Lai Y , et al. Genetic alteration of Chinese patients with rectal mucosal melanoma[J]. BMC Cancer, 2021, 21 (1): 623.
doi: 10.1186/s12885-021-08383-6 |
9 | Slingluff CL , Jr. Vollmer RT , Seigler HF . Anorectal melanoma: Clinical characteristics and results of surgical management in twenty-four patients[J]. Surgery, 1990, 107 (1): 1- 9. |
10 |
Bai X , Kong Y , Chi Z , et al. MAPK pathway and TERT promoter gene mutation pattern and its prognostic value in melanoma patients: A retrospective study of 2 793 cases[J]. Clin Cancer Res, 2017, 23 (20): 6120- 6127.
doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-17-0980 |
11 | Kanaan Z , Mulhall A , Mahid S , et al. A systematic review of prognosis and therapy of anal malignant melanoma: A plea for more precise reporting of location and thickness[J]. Am Surg, 2012, 78 (1): 28- 35. |
12 |
裴炜, 周海涛, 陈佳楠, 等. 64例肛管直肠恶性黑色素瘤外科治疗及预后因素分析[J]. 中华胃肠外科杂志, 2016, 19 (11): 1305- 1308.
doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1671-0274.2016.11.021 |
13 |
周代超, 刘翠平, 高蕾, 等. 肛管直肠恶性黑色素瘤36例诊治及预后分析[J]. 中国肿瘤临床, 2017, 44 (14): 717- 721.
doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-8179.2017.14.430 |
14 |
冯亚光, 韩灵雨, 徐烨, 等. 原发性肛管直肠恶性黑色素瘤的临床特征和预后因素研究[J]. 中华消化杂志, 2021, 41 (4): 247- 252.
doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn311367-20200709-00435 |
15 |
Chen H , Cai Y , Liu Y , et al. Incidence, surgical treatment, and prognosis of anorectal melanoma from 1973 to 2011: A population-based SEER analysis[J]. Medicine (Baltimore), 2016, 95 (7): e2770.
doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000002770 |
16 |
Nagarajan P , Piao J , Ning J , et al. Prognostic model for patient survival in primary anorectal mucosal melanoma: Stage at presentation determines relevance of histopathologic features[J]. Mod Pathol, 2020, 33 (3): 496- 513.
doi: 10.1038/s41379-019-0340-7 |
17 | Dodds TJ , Wilmott JS , Jackett LA , et al. Primary anorectal melanoma: Clinical, immunohistology and DNA analysis of 43 cases[J]. Pathology, 2019, 51 (1): 39- 45. |
18 | Wang M , Zhang Z , Zhu J , et al. Tumour diameter is a predictor of mesorectal and mesenteric lymph node metastases in anorectal melanoma[J]. Colorectal Dis, 2013, 15 (9): 1086- 1092. |
19 |
Perez DR , Trakarnsanga A , Shia J , et al. Locoregional lymphadenectomy in the surgical management of anorectal melanoma[J]. Ann Surg Oncol, 2013, 20 (7): 2339- 2344.
doi: 10.1245/s10434-012-2812-6 |
20 |
Ballo MT , Gershenwald JE , Zagars GK , et al. Sphincter-sparing local excision and adjuvant radiation for anal-rectal melanoma[J]. J Clin Oncol, 2002, 20 (23): 4555- 4558.
doi: 10.1200/JCO.2002.03.002 |
21 |
Yeh JJ , Shia J , Hwu WJ , et al. The role of abdominoperineal resection as surgical therapy for anorectal melanoma[J]. Ann Surg, 2006, 244 (6): 1012- 1017.
doi: 10.1097/01.sla.0000225114.56565.f9 |
22 |
Falch C , Stojadinovic A , Hann-von-Weyhern C , et al. Anorectal malignant melanoma: Extensive 45-year review and proposal for a novel staging classification[J]. J Am Coll Surg, 2013, 217 (2): 324- 335.
doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2013.02.031 |
23 |
Menon H , Patel RR , Cushman TR , et al. Management and outcomes of primary anorectal melanoma in the United States[J]. Future Oncol, 2020, 16 (8): 329- 338.
doi: 10.2217/fon-2019-0715 |
24 |
Jutten E , Kruijff S , Francken AB , et al. Survival following surgical treatment for anorectal melanoma seems similar for local excision and extensive resection regardless of nodal involvement[J]. Surg Oncol, 2021, 37, 101558.
doi: 10.1016/j.suronc.2021.101558 |
25 |
Ogata D , Tsutsui K , Namikawa K , et al. Treatment outcomes and prognostic factors in 47 patients with primary anorectal malignant melanoma in the immune therapy era[J]. J Cancer Res Clin Oncol, 2022,
doi: 10.1007/s00432-022-03933-2 |
26 |
Santi R , Simi L , Fucci R , et al. KIT genetic alterations in anorectal melanomas[J]. J Clin Pathol, 2015, 68 (2): 130- 134.
doi: 10.1136/jclinpath-2014-202572 |
[1] | 朱晓娟,张虹,张爽,李东,李鑫,徐玲,李挺. 人表皮生长因子受体2低表达乳腺癌的临床病理学特征及预后[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2023, 55(2): 243-253. |
[2] | 沈棋,刘亿骁,何群. 肾黏液样小管状和梭形细胞癌的临床病理特点及预后[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2023, 55(2): 276-282. |
[3] | 宿骞,彭歆,周传香,俞光岩. 369例口腔颌面部非霍奇金淋巴瘤的临床病理特点及预后[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2023, 55(1): 13-21. |
[4] | 张铨,宋海峰,马冰磊,张喆楠,周朝晖,李傲林,刘军,梁磊,朱时雨,张骞. 术前预后营养指数可作为预测非转移性肾细胞癌预后的指标[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2023, 55(1): 149-155. |
[5] | 邢晓燕,张筠肖,朱冯赟智,王一帆,周新尧,李玉慧. 皮肌炎合并巨噬细胞活化综合征5例[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2022, 54(6): 1214-1218. |
[6] | 曹乐清,周婧睿,陈育红,陈欢,韩伟,陈瑶,张圆圆,闫晨华,程翼飞,莫晓冬,付海霞,韩婷婷,吕萌,孔军,孙于谦,王昱,许兰平,张晓辉,黄晓军. 异基因造血干细胞移植后晚发重症肺炎患者治疗与预后转归的关系[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2022, 54(5): 1013-1020. |
[7] | 张崔建,何志嵩,周利群. 上尿路尿路上皮癌的淋巴清扫[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2022, 54(4): 592-594. |
[8] | 邱敏,连岩岩,陆敏,王滨帅,田晓军,卢剑,刘承,张树栋,姜敏,马潞林. 多原发癌合并肾癌的治疗及预后[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2022, 54(4): 680-685. |
[9] | 博尔术,洪鹏,张宇,邓绍晖,葛力源,陆敏,李楠,马潞林,张树栋. 乳头状肾细胞癌的临床病理特征和预后分析[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2022, 54(4): 615-620. |
[10] | 邓宇含,姜勇,王子尧,刘爽,汪雨欣,刘宝花. 基于长短期记忆网络和Logistic回归的重症监护病房脑卒中患者院内死亡风险预测[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2022, 54(3): 458-467. |
[11] | 丁婷婷,曾楚雄,胡丽娜,余明华. 基于癌症基因组图谱数据库结直肠癌免疫细胞浸润预测模型的建立[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2022, 54(2): 203-208. |
[12] | 蓝璘,贺洋,安金刚,张益. 颧骨缺损不同修复重建方法和预后的回顾性分析[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2022, 54(2): 356-362. |
[13] | 王飞,朱翔,贺蓓,朱红,沈宁. 自发缓解的滤泡性细支气管炎伴非特异性间质性肺炎1例报道并文献复习[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2021, 53(6): 1196-1200. |
[14] | 高伟波,石茂静,张海燕,吴春波,朱继红. 显著高铁蛋白血症与噬血细胞性淋巴组织细胞增多症的相互关系[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2021, 53(5): 921-927. |
[15] | 张梅香,史文芝,刘建新,王春键,李燕,王蔚,江滨. MLL-AF6融合基因阳性急性髓系白血病的临床特征及预后[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2021, 53(5): 915-920. |
|