北京大学学报(医学版) ›› 2014, Vol. 46 ›› Issue (5): 711-714.

• 论著 • 上一篇    下一篇

选择性小肠造影对肠梗阻诊断的影像学价值:98例病例分析

张耀朋,王爱英△   

  1. (北京大学第三医院消化科,北京100191)
  • 出版日期:2014-10-18 发布日期:2014-10-18

Diagnostic value of selective small bowel enteroclysis in imageology of intestinal obstruction: clinical analysis of 98 cases

ZHANG Yao-peng, WANG Ai-ying△   

  1. (Department of Gastroenterology, Peking University Third Hospital, Beijing 100191, China)
  • Online:2014-10-18 Published:2014-10-18

摘要: 目的:通过对比分析肠梗阻患者的选择性小肠造影结果与出院诊断结果的一致性程度,探讨选择性小肠造影对肠梗阻的诊断价值及影响该检查方法效果的因素,以提高选择性小肠造影对肠梗阻的诊断效力。方法:选择性小肠造影是利用具有治疗作用的较长的经鼻小肠减压管对小肠局部进行造影观察。总结2008年4月至2012年4月在北京大学第三医院消化科进行选择性小肠造影的98例患者,对照选择性小肠造影与出院诊断的结果,通过诊断一致性评分进行诊断效能评估。诊断一致性评分分为5级:0分,选择性小肠造影无任何意义;0.25分,能够确定肠梗阻存在;0.50分,能够提示梗阻部位、范围和程度的某部分;0.75分,能够明确梗阻部位、范围、程度,并能提出可疑病因,且与最终出院诊断接近;1.00分,能够明确梗阻部位、程度、范围及梗阻原因,且与出院诊断完全一致。结果: 在98例住院患者中,入院诊断以术后肠梗阻比例最高,占53.1%;出院诊断以粘连性肠梗阻者最多,占50%。肠梗阻以回肠梗阻(47.6%)、多发性肠梗阻(41.7%)、不完全性肠梗阻(59.5%)较多。影像学表现以肠道粘连、狭窄为主(61.9%)。在诊断一致性评分中,得分为0.75和1.00分的具有较高一致性的患者为50例,得分为0和0.25的具有较低一致性的患者为25例,两组间差异有统计学意义(P=0.004)。结论:经鼻肠减压管选择性小肠造影对肠梗阻患者具有较高的影像诊断价值,突破了传统小肠气钡双重造影在肠梗阻方面的应用禁忌,在梗阻部位、范围、程度及病因分析方面均具有较高的诊断一致性。影响诊断价值的因素主要是置管的位置,故动态监测至为重要。

关键词: 内窥镜检查, 胃肠道, 肠梗阻, 插管法, 胃肠, 减压

Abstract: Objective:To improve the diagnosticability of selective enteroclysis in the area of intestinal obstruction, by reviewing the cases of selective intestinal enteroclysis through a naso-intestinal decompression tube, and evaluating its diagnostic concordance level and the influence factors. Methods: The selective enteroclysis was different from traditional enteroclysis; it utilized a naso-intestinal decompression long tube to perform local intestinal opacification. In the four years between Apr. 2008 and Apr. 2012, 98 cases of selective intestinal enteroclysis were analyzed retrospectively, and diagnostic concordance value was made between the radiologic diagnosis and the final clinical diagnosis recorded in the medical history according to an evaluating criterion. Five scores were used in the evaluating system: 0 meant that the enteroclysis had no valuable information to provide; 0.25 meant that the enteroclysis could prompt the occurring of obstruction, but could not provide the information of location and cause; 0.50 meant that the enteroclysis could find the location of obstruction, but could not determine the cause; 0.75 meant that the enteroclysis could provide some valuable analysis of the causes of the obstruction, and very close to the final clinical diagnosis; 1.00 meant that the complete concordance between the enteroclysis diagnosis and the final clinical diagnosis. The influence factors would also be considered to improve the competence of the selective enteroclysis in the diagnosis of intestinal obstruction. Results: In the 98 cases, 53.1% had definite abdominal operative history. The most common cause of obstruction was conglutination between intestinal loops when discharged from hospital, almost occupying 50%. In this group of cases, the most common types were ileum obstruction (47.6%), multiple location obstruction (41.7%) and incomplete obstruction (59.5%). Conglutination and stricture of the intestinal was the common radiologic appearance (61.9%). There were 50 cases with higher concordance scoring 0.75 or 1.00, in comparison, there were 25 cases with lower concordance scoring 0 or 0.25. The difference between the two groups had statistical significance. Conclusion: As a combination of traditional enteroclysis and nasointestinal decompression tube, selective intestinal enteroclysis could exert higher diagnostic ability than that of traditional enteroclysis and also could break through the limitations of traditional enteroclysis in the condition of intestinal obstruction. This method has higher diagnostic concordance and could provide valuable information in obstruction location, extent, severity and possible causes. The main factor influencing the effectiveness of the examination is the location of the decompression tube and dynamic observation would be very helpful and important.

Key words: Endoscopy,gastrointestinal, Intestinal obstruction, Intubation,gastrointestinal, Decompression

[1] 朱薇,祝斌,刘晓光. 全内镜下突出腰椎间盘摘除术后功能状态的影响因素[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2023, 55(3): 537-542.
[2] 包文晗,唐雯. 初诊IgA肾病患者的肠道菌群及其与疾病进展因素的相关分析[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2023, 55(1): 124-132.
[3] 郑炜,黄永辉,常虹,姚炜,李柯,闫秀娥,张耀朋,王迎春,刘文正. 内镜下逆行胰胆管造影在胆肠吻合术后患者中的应用[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2022, 54(6): 1178-1184.
[4] 翟书珩,胡攀攀,刘晓光. 术中超声辅助下环形减压术治疗多节段胸椎后纵韧带骨化症[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2022, 54(5): 1021-1027.
[5] 张家赫,史佳琪,陈章健,贾光. 基于人消化道微生态体外模拟系统观察纳米二氧化钛对肠道菌群的影响[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2022, 54(3): 468-476.
[6] 王子靖,李在玲. 有幽门螺杆菌感染家族史儿童胃部菌群的特点[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2021, 53(6): 1115-1121.
[7] 牛占岳,薛艳,张静,张贺军,丁士刚. 胃腺瘤性息肉的内镜和病理特点及癌变的危险因素分析[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2021, 53(6): 1122-1127.
[8] 李军,顾芳,李在玲,吕愈敏. 北京单中心回顾性分析儿童肠镜临床特点及疾病谱12年演变[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2019, 51(5): 819-823.
[9] 刘鲲鹏,王宝宁,申琰琰,李卫霞,李昭,姚兰. 胸部硬膜外给予利多卡因对双腔气管插管患者血流动力学和唤醒水平的影响[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2019, 51(4): 742-747.
[10] 王少刚, 余虓. 经皮肾镜碎石术——日间手术新探索[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2017, 49(5): 753-755.
[11] 于峥嵘,李淳德,朱赛楠,孙浩林,赵耀,漆龙涛. 经皮椎间孔入路内镜下神经根减压治疗腰椎管狭窄症的短期随访[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2017, 49(2): 252-255.
[12] 郑义林, 宋文芳, 王东信. 可弯曲喉罩与加强型气管导管用于俯卧位腰椎手术的比较[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2017, 49(2): 262-266.
[13] 许挺,李民,徐懋,郭向阳. 两种导管塑形方法在视可尼喉镜引导双腔气管导管插管中的比较[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2016, 48(6): 1038-1042.
[14] 安岩,田伟,曾成,李加宁,刘亚军. 以斜坡枢椎角评价上颈椎畸形患者术中脊髓压迫解除情况的可行性研究[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2016, 48(2): 215-217.
[15] 黄勍,王雪梅,刘玉兰,冯桂建,尤鹏. 白塞病胶囊内镜检查5例[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2016, 48(2): 366-369.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!