北京大学学报(医学版) ›› 2015, Vol. 47 ›› Issue (1): 85-89.

• 论著 • 上一篇    下一篇

模拟口腔取模环境下TRIOS数字印模的精密度

杨鑫1,孙一飞2,田雷2,司文捷3,冯海兰1,刘亦洪4,5△   

  1. (1. 北京大学口腔医学院·口腔医院修复科,北京100081; 2. 深圳爱尔创科技股份有限公司,广东深圳518000; 3. 清华大学材料科学与工程系,北京100083; 4. 北京大学口腔医学院·口腔医院综合科,北京100081; 5. 口腔数字化医疗技术和材料国家工程实验室,北京100081)
  • 出版日期:2015-02-18 发布日期:2015-02-18

Precision of digital impressions with TRIOS under simulated intraoral impression taking conditions

YANG Xin1, SUN Yi-fei2, TIAN Lei2, SI Wen-jie3, FENG Hai-lan1, LIU Yi-hong4△   

  1. (1.Department of Prosthodontics, Peking University School and Hospital of Stomatology, Beijing 100081, China; 2. Shenzhen Upcera Co. LTD, Guangdong Shenzhen 518000, China; 3.Department of Material Science and Engineering, Tsinghua University, Beijing 100083, China; 4. Department of General Dentistry, Peking University School and Hospital of Stomatology, Beijing 100081, China; 5. National Engineering Laboratory for Digital and Material Technology of Stomatology, Peking University School and Hospital of Stomatology, Beijing 100081, China)
  • Online:2015-02-18 Published:2015-02-18

摘要: 目的:研究模拟口腔取模环境下TRIOS数字印模的精密度,并与口外模型扫描的精密度比较。方法:制作6个#14~#17树脂牙列,其中#16为离体牙的全瓷冠预备体。对树脂牙列分别进行:(1)硅橡胶取印模,灌注石膏模型,3Shape D700模型扫描仪重复扫描10次;(2)固定于仿头模内,3Shape TRIOS口内扫描仪重复扫描10次。Geomagic Qualify12.0对重复扫描数据两两进行最佳拟合对齐和3D比较,分别输出配准数据间的平均偏差(averaged errors,AE)和差异分布彩图。秩和检验定量分析数字印模组与模型组AE的差异,根据差异分布彩图定性描述偏差分布特征。结果: 数字印模组AE均数为7.058 281 μm,高于模型组4.092 363 μm,差异具有统计学意义(P<0.05),但是数字印模组AE的均数和中位数均小于10 μm,表明扫描数据间一致性良好。模型组偏差分布均匀,数字印模组偏差较大区域主要分布于肩台及邻面区域。结论:TRIOS数字印模精密度良好,可达到临床应用要求,预备体肩台及邻面区域为扫描的难点。

关键词: 牙科印模技术, 成像, 三维, 牙修复体设计

Abstract: Objective: To evaluate the precision of digital impressions taken under simulated clinical impression taking conditions with TRIOS and to compare with the precision of extraoral digitalizations. Methods: Six #14-#17 epoxy resin dentitions with extracted #16 tooth preparations embedded were made. For each artificial dentition, (1)a silicone rubber impression was taken with individual tray, poured with type IV plaster,and digitalized with 3Shape D700 model scanner for 10 times; (2) fastened to a dental simulator, 10 digital impressions for each were taken with 3Shape TRIOS intraoral scanner. To assess the precision, best-fit algorithm and 3D comparison were conducted between repeated scan models pairwise by Geomagic Qualify 12.0, exported as averaged errors (AE) and color-coded diagrams. Non-parametric analysis was performed to compare the precisions of digital impressions and model images. The color-coded diagrams were used to show the deviations distributions. Results: The mean of AE for digital impressions was 7.058 281 μm, which was greater than that of 4.092 363 μm for the model images (P<0.05). However, the means and medians of AE for digital impressions were no more than 10 μm, which meant that the consistency between the digital impressions was good. The deviations distribution was uniform in the model images,while nonuniform in the digital impressions with greater deviations lay mainly around the shoulders and interproximal surfaces. Conclusion: Digital impressions with TRIOS are of good precision and up to the clinical standard. Shoulders and interproximal surfaces scanning are more difficult.

Key words: Dental impression technique, Imaging, three-dimensional, Dental prosthesis design

[1] 温奥楠, 张晓会, 杨咏涛, 高梓翔, 李文博, 单珅瑶, 商相宜, 田淯文, 郭殊玮, 王艺蓁, 王勇, 赵一姣. 基于非刚性配准构建三维颜面微笑仿真序列数据的方法[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2026, 58(1): 139-144.
[2] 邵梁, 马雯洁, 陈莹, 丁茜, 张磊. 上颌切牙前伸和正中咬合接触解剖特征的数字化测量与分析[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2026, 58(1): 99-106.
[3] 王翠萍, 陈哲, 程永静. 超微血流成像评估与膝骨关节炎临床症状的关联研究[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2025, 57(6): 1096-1100.
[4] 宋凤岐, 徐心雨, 刘筱菁, 李自力. 上颌骨前部和整体顺时针旋转改善骨性Ⅲ类牙颌面畸形患者鼻旁凹陷的对比[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2025, 57(5): 980-988.
[5] 肖宇嘉, 毛渤淳, 周彦恒. 姿势性微笑的三维形态学研究[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2025, 57(5): 989-995.
[6] 王泽远, 于栓宝, 郑浩轲, 陶金, 范雅峰, 张雪培. 基于临床特征和多参数MRI的前列腺癌盆腔淋巴结转移的术前预测模型[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2025, 57(4): 684-691.
[7] 宁圆, 张晓盈, 李雪, 李原, 何菁, 金月波. 干燥综合征并发乳腺淋巴瘤1例[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2025, 57(4): 808-811.
[8] 钱锟, 刘亦洪. 基于直接法和间接法数字印模制作的高嵌体适合性评价的体外研究[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2025, 57(3): 604-609.
[9] 孙建军, 马千权, 尹晓亮, 杨辰龙, 张嘉, 陈素华, 吴超, 谢京城, 韩芸峰, 林国中, 司雨, 杨军, 邬海博, 赵强. 任意维度重建磁共振对骶管囊肿进行精准分型对于指导微创手术和康复的意义[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2025, 57(2): 303-308.
[10] 仇师禹, 练洋, 康一帆, 张雷, 蔡义望, 单小峰, 蔡志刚. 基于下颌骨数据库和全连接神经网络的三维检索模型辅助下的下颌骨个性化重建[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2025, 57(2): 360-368.
[11] 马丽娟, 腾雍辉, 王勇, 赵一姣, 张馨月, 秦庆钊, 尹东. 乳牙缺失数字化丝圈间隙保持器的三维有限元分析[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2025, 57(2): 376-383.
[12] 朱玉佳, 沈华, 温奥楠, 高梓翔, 秦庆钊, 单珅瑶, 李文博, 傅湘玲, 赵一姣, 王勇. 三维颌面对称参考平面智能构建的深度学习算法[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2025, 57(1): 113-120.
[13] 徐昕恺, 赵建江, 田素坤, 刘中宁, 赵晓一, 赵晓波, 江腾飞, 陈晓军, 马超, 孙玉春. 集成压缩气流系统扫描头辅助获取液体干扰表面三维数据精度评价[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2025, 57(1): 121-127.
[14] 吴灵, 方嘉琨, 刘筱菁, 李自力, 李阳, 王晓霞. 基于牙颌面畸形患者三维颅面特征相似性度量模型的建立及评估[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2025, 57(1): 128-135.
[15] 蔡文心, 杨琼英, 韩丹, 陈哲, 程永静. 红外热成像检查在风湿病中的应用及展望[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2024, 56(6): 1132-1136.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!