Email Alert | RSS

北京大学学报（医学版） ›› 2019, Vol. 51 ›› Issue (6): 1119-1123. doi: 10.19723/j.issn.1671-167X.2019.06.025

• 论著 • 上一篇    下一篇

后牙种植冠桥修复后局部咬合变化的定量分析

罗强1,丁茜2,张磊2,△(),谢秋菲2   

  1. 1. 中国人民解放军总医院口腔医学中心,北京　100853
    2. 北京大学口腔医学院·口腔医院,修复科　国家口腔疾病临床医学研究中心　口腔数字化医疗技术和材料国家工程实验室　口腔数字医学北京市重点实验室, 北京　100081
  • 收稿日期:2017-10-23 出版日期:2019-12-18 发布日期:2019-12-19
  • 通讯作者: 张磊 E-mail:drzhanglei@yeah.net
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金(81671026);首都卫生发展科研专项基金(2014-4-4105)

Quantitative analysis of occlusal changes in posterior partial fixed implant supported prostheses

Qiang LUO1,Qian DING2,Lei ZHANG2,△(),Qiu-fei XIE2   

  1. 1. Institute of Stomatology, General Hospital of Chinese PLA, Beijing 100853, China
    2. Department of Prosthodontics, Peking University School and Hospital of Stomatology & National Clinical Research Center for Oral Diseases & National Engineering Laboratory for Digital and Material Technology of Stomatology & Beijing Key Laboratory of Digital Stomatology, Beijing 100081, China
  • Received:2017-10-23 Online:2019-12-18 Published:2019-12-19
  • Contact: Lei ZHANG E-mail:drzhanglei@yeah.net
  • Supported by:
    Supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China(81671026);the Capital Health Development Research Special(2014-4-4105)

RICH HTML

 19   

PDF (PC)

381

摘要：

目的 定量分析后牙种植冠桥修复后局部咬合力与咬合接触的变化规律,为种植修复体的精确咬合设计、调整和维护提供参考。方法 按照一定的纳入和排除标准收集后牙区缺牙并行种植单冠或固定桥修复的患者,分别于修复后2周、3个月、6个月、12个月复查,采用咬合纸和T-Scan Ⅲ ?(Tekscan,South Boston,USA)电子咬合分析系统检查全牙列咬合接触情况,分别记录每个时间点对照牙、近中邻牙和种植修复体的咬合接触时间和咬合力百分比,分析局部咬合接触和咬合力随时间的变化。结果 共收集33例患者(男性16人,女性17人,年龄24~72岁)、37颗种植修复体,修复体戴用3~12个月(平均8.3个月)。2周到3个月,种植修复体达到咬合接触的时间显著缩短(P<0.05,Wilcoxon检验),种植修复体的咬合力百分比显著增大(P<0.05,Wilcoxon检验);3~6个月、6~12个月期间,咬合力百分比和咬合接触时间变化均不明显。2周时,种植修复体咬合力显著低于对照牙(P<0.01),而戴用3个月后种植修复体咬合力与对照牙差异已无统计学意义,6个月、12个月时差异均无统计学意义。结论 轻咬合接触和咬合接触时间延迟的后牙种植修复体,在修复后3个月咬合接触强度会明显增加,临床上种植修复后3个月复查时应重点关注咬合情况。

关键词: 牙修复体, 牙牙合, 牙种植, 调牙合

Abstract:

Objective: To analyze changes in occlusal force distribution and occlusal contact in poste-rior partial fixed implant-supported prostheses over time, and to provide reference for the precise occlusion design, adjustment and maintenance of implant prostheses.Methods: According to certain inclusion and exclusion criteria, patients were recruited from partially edentulous patients who had received implant-supported single crown or fixed bridge in the posterior region. The patients were collected since the implant prostheses settling and scheduled for the routine examination of implant prostheses and the occlusal examinations of complete dentition after 2 weeks, 3, 6, and 12 months. Occlusal examinations were taken with the articulating papers and T-Scan Ⅲ ? (Tekscan, South Boston, USA), which could check and measure the occlusal contact condition of complete dentition. The occlusion time and relative occlusal forces of implant prostheses, mesial adjacent teeth and control teeth were recorded at the same time.Results: Thirty-seven posterior partial fixed implant prostheses in 33 patients (17 women and 16 men, aged 24-70 years) were followed up for 3-12 months (average 8.3 months). At baseline, the relative occlusal forces of implant prostheses were significantly lower than those of the corresponding control teeth (P<0.001). However, after 3 months, the relative occlusal forces of implant prostheses had significantly increased (P<0.05), while control teeth decreased significantly (P<0.05), resulting in no statistical significance between them. The implant prostheses occlusion time ratio also increased significantly from 2 weeks to 3 months (P<0.05). There was no significant difference from the third month to the sixth month, or from the sixth month to the twelfth month (P>0.05).Conclusion: Light contact and time-delayed occlusion of posterior implant prostheses changes significantly in the first three months after settling implant prostheses. These changes mainly include the advance of the time point of the implant prosthesis to start the occlusion contact, and the increase of the occlusal force of the implant prosthesis. The occlusion of posterior implant prostheses should be carefully monitored at end of the third month follow-up clinically.

Key words: Dental prosthesis, Dental occlusion, Dental implantation, Occlusal adjustment

中图分类号: 

  • R783.3

图1

T-scan咬合检查操作(A),数字化咬合记录与咬合纸检查记录进行匹配校准(B)"

图2

从咬合开始到牙列咬合平衡稳定的时间序列"

表1

种植修复体和对照天然牙的咬合力百分比不同时间的对比"

Time points Implant
prostheses/%,
median (min, max)		 Control
natural teeth/%,
median (min, max)		 P
2 weeks (n=37) 7 (1, 18) 14 (3, 28) <0.001
3 months (n=27) 9 (1, 25) 11 (5, 24) 0.247
6 months (n=25) 9 (2, 25) 13 (3, 23) 0.156
12 months (n=14) 10 (3, 20) 14 (5, 28) 0.140

图3

种植修复体、近中邻牙、对照牙的咬合力百分比随时间纵向变化"

表2

种植修复体的咬合力百分比与种植修复体咬合时间比值的相关性"

Time points Implant prostheses relative occlusal force/%,
median (min, max)		 Implant occlusion time ratio,
median (min, max)		 R P
2 weeks (n=37) 7 (1, 18) 0.44 (0.08, 1.00) 0.447 0.006
3 months (n=27) 9 (1, 25) 0.64 (0.11, 1.00) 0.714 <0.001
6 months (n=25) 9 (2, 25) 0.70 (0.19, 0.96) 0.497 0.011
12 months (n=14) 10 (3, 20) 0.83 (0.22, 0.93) 0.113 0.700

图4

种植修复体咬合时间比的纵向变化"

[1] Zembic A, Kim S, Zwahlen M , et al. Systematic review of the survival rate and incidence of biologic, technical, and esthetic complications of single implant abutments supporting fixed prostheses[J]. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants, 2014,29(Suppl):99-116.
[2] Velzen FJ, Ofec R, Schulten EA , et al. 10-year survival rate and the incidence of peri-implant disease of 374 titanium dental implants with a SLA surface: a prospective cohort study in 177 fully and partially edentulous patients[J]. Clin Oral Implants Res, 2015,26(10):1121-1128.
[3] Jung RE, Zembic A, Pjetursson BE , et al. Systematic review of the survival rate and the incidence of biological, technical, and aesthetic complications of single crowns on implants reported in longitudinal studies with a mean follow-up of 5 years[J]. Clin Oral Implants Res, 2012,23(Suppl 6):2-21.
[4] Lee JH, Lee JB, Park JI , et al. Mechanical complication rates and optimal horizontal distance of the most distally positioned implant-supported single crowns in the posterior region: a study with a mean follow-up of 3 years[J]. J Prosthodont, 2015,24(7):517-524.
[5] Anner R, Grossmann Y, Anner Y , et al. Smoking, diabetes mellitus, periodontitis, and supportive periodontal treatment as factors associated with dental implant survival: a long-term retrospective evaluation of patients followed for up to 10 years[J]. Implant Dent, 2010,19(1):57-64.
[6] Kim Y, Oh TJ, Misch CE , et al. Occlusal considerations in implant therapy: clinical guidelines with biomechanical rationale[J]. Clin Oral Implants Res, 2005,16(1):26-35.
[7] Goodacre CJ, Bernal G, Rungcharassaeng K , et al. Clinical complications with implants and implant prostheses[J]. J Prosthet Dent, 2003,90(2):121-132.
[8] Yuan JC, Sukotjo C . Occlusion for implant-supported fixed dental prostheses in partially edentulous patients: a literature review and current concepts[J]. J Periodontal Implant Sci, 2013,43(2):51-57.
[9] Bocklage R . Biomechanical aspects of monoblock implant bridges for the edentulous maxilla and mandible: concepts of occlusion and articulation[J]. Implant Dent, 2004,13(1):49-53.
[10] Kerstein RB . Nonsimultaneous tooth contact in combined implant and natural tooth occlusal schemes[J]. Pract Proced Aesthet Dent, 2001,13(9):751-755.
[11] Stevens CJ . Computerized occlusal implant management with the T-Scan II System: a case report[J]. Dent Today, 2006,25(2):88-91.
[12] Lewis MB, Klineberg I . Prosthodontic considerations designed to optimize outcomes for single-tooth implants. A review of the literature[J]. Aust Dent J, 2011,56(2):181-192.
[13] Roberts SD, Kapadia H, Greenlee G , et al. Midfacial and dental changes associated with nasal positive airway pressure in children with obstructive sleep apnea and craniofacial conditions[J]. J Clin Sleep Med, 2016,12(4):469-475.
[14] D’Incau E, Couture C, Maureille B . Human tooth wear in the past and the present: tribological mechanisms, scoring systems, dental and skeletal compensations[J]. Arch Oral Biol, 2012,57(3):214-229.
[15] Mundhe K, Jain V, Pruthi G , et al. Clinical study to evaluate the wear of natural enamel antagonist to zirconia and metal ceramic crowns[J]. J Prosthet Dent, 2015,114(3):358-365.
[16] Palaniappan S, Elsen L, Lijnen I , et al. Nanohybrid and microfilled hybrid versus conventional hybrid composite restorations: 5-year clinical wear performance[J]. Clinl Oral Investig, 2012,16(1):181-190.
[17] Heij DG, Opdebeeck H, van Steenberghe D, et al. Facial deve-lopment, continuous tooth eruption, and mesial drift as compromising factors for implant placement[J]. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants, 2006,21(6):867-878.
[18] Schulte W . Implants and the periodontium[J]. Int Dent J, 1995,45(1):16-26.
[19] Kerstein RB, Radke J . Clinician accuracy when subjectively interpreting articulating paper markings[J]. Cranio, 2014,32(1):13-23.
[20] Koos B, Godt A, Schille C , et al. Precision of an instrumentation-based method of analyzing occlusion and its resulting distribution of forces in the dental arch[J]. J Orofac Orthop, 2010,71(6):403-410.
[1] 王鹃,尉华杰,孙井德,邱立新. 预成刚性连接杆用于无牙颌种植即刻印模制取的应用评价[J]. 北京大学学报（医学版）, 2022, 54(1): 187-192.
[2] 梁峰,吴敏节,邹立东. 后牙区单牙种植修复5年后的临床修复疗效观察[J]. 北京大学学报（医学版）, 2021, 53(5): 970-976.
[3] 刘晓强,杨洋,周建锋,刘建彰,谭建国. 640例单牙种植术对血压和心率影响的队列研究[J]. 北京大学学报（医学版）, 2021, 53(2): 390-395.
[4] 周培茹, 蒋析, 华红. 口腔黏膜病患者口腔种植的时机及注意事项[J]. 北京大学学报（医学版）, 2021, 53(1): 5-8.
[5] 李蓬,朴牧子,胡洪成,王勇,赵一姣,申晓婧. 经嵴顶上颌窦底提升术后不植骨同期种植的影像研究[J]. 北京大学学报（医学版）, 2021, 53(1): 95-101.
[6] 郝柯屹,罗佳,邸萍,郭厚佐,沈惠丹,刘焱萍,张宇,林野. 三维图像融合技术评价上颌全牙列种植固定修复前后的鼻唇软组织形态变化[J]. 北京大学学报（医学版）, 2020, 52(5): 924-930.
[7] 李维婷,李蓬,朴牧子,张芳,邸杰. 不同备洞方法收集自体骨骨量[J]. 北京大学学报（医学版）, 2020, 52(1): 103-106.
[8] 李琳琳,赵一姣,陈虎,王勇,孙玉春. 转移牙合架固定法三维重建牙尖交错牙合的精度评价[J]. 北京大学学报（医学版）, 2020, 52(1): 138-143.
[9] 萧宁,孙玉春,赵一姣,王勇. 三种数字化分析算法测量咬合接触分布及面积的对比研究[J]. 北京大学学报（医学版）, 2020, 52(1): 144-151.
[10] 释栋,曹婕,戴世爱,孟焕新. 植体周炎再生治疗短期疗效观察[J]. 北京大学学报（医学版）, 2020, 52(1): 58-63.
[11] 林春平,卢松鹤,朱浚鑫,胡洪成,岳兆国,唐志辉. 个性化根形种植体的螺纹形态对周围牙槽骨应力分布影响的三维有限元分析[J]. 北京大学学报（医学版）, 2019, 51(6): 1130-1137.
[12] 刘潇倩,陈秋雯,冯海兰,王兵,屈健,孙振,衡墨迪,潘韶霞. 无牙颌患者locator附着体种植覆盖义齿修复后口腔卫生维护的纵向研究[J]. 北京大学学报（医学版）, 2019, 51(1): 136-144.
[13] 柴金友，刘建彰，王兵，屈健，孙振，高文慧，郭天晧，冯海兰，潘韶霞. 一种切削法制作的数字化种植手术导板加工精度评价[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2018, 50(5): 892-898.
[14] 吴敏节，邹立东，梁峰. 上前牙即刻种植即刻修复负载3年后软、硬组织变化的临床观察[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2018, 50(4): 694-699.
[15] 张海东，张立，释栋，韩劼，闫夏，谢也斯，孟焕新. 锥形锁柱种植体用于因牙周炎缺牙患者修复的临床观察[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2018, 50(2): 300-307.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited
  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] 赵磊, 王天龙 . 右心室舒张末期容量监测用于肝移植术中容量管理的临床研究[J]. 北京大学学报（医学版）, 2009, 41(2): 188 -191 .
[2] 万有, , 韩济生, John E. Pintar. 孤啡肽基因敲除小鼠电针镇痛作用增强[J]. 北京大学学报（医学版）, 2009, 41(3): 376 -379 .
[3] 张燕, 韩志慧, 钟延丰, 王盛兰, 李玲玲, 郑丹枫. 骨骼肌活组织检查病理诊断技术的改进及应用[J]. 北京大学学报（医学版）, 2009, 41(4): 459 -462 .
[4] 林红, 王玉凤, 吴野平. 学校生活技能教育对小学三年级学生行为问题影响的对照研究[J]. 北京大学学报（医学版）, 2007, 39(3): 319 -322 .
[5] 丰雷, 程嘉, 王玉凤. 注意缺陷多动障碍儿童的运动协调功能[J]. 北京大学学报（医学版）, 2007, 39(3): 333 -336 .
[6] 李岳玲, 钱秋瑾, 王玉凤. 儿童注意缺陷多动障碍成人期预后及其预测因素[J]. 北京大学学报（医学版）, 2007, 39(3): 337 -340 .
[7] 牟向东, 王广发, 刁小莉, 阙呈立. 肺黏膜相关淋巴组织型边缘区B细胞淋巴瘤一例[J]. 北京大学学报（医学版）, 2007, 39(4): 346 -350 .
[8] 韩金涛, 赵军, 栾景源, 张龙. 多发结核性腹主动脉瘤一例[J]. 北京大学学报（医学版）, 2007, 39(4): 361 -364 .
[9] 常杏芝, 卢红梅, 张月华, 秦炯. 以高血压与红斑肢痛为主要表现的汞中毒一例[J]. 北京大学学报（医学版）, 2007, 39(4): 377 -380 .
[10] 李西慧, 肖锋, 李岩, 杜迎利, 宋乃庆, 张明礼. 川崎病合并心肌梗死临床治疗一例[J]. 北京大学学报（医学版）, 2007, 39(4): 381 -384 .
ISSN 1671-167X
CN 11-4691/R
主管单位：中华人民共和国教育部
主办单位：北京大学
地址： 北京市海淀区学院路38号 北京大学医学部 《北京大学学报（医学版）》
邮编：100191
电话：010-82801551
Email： xbbjb2@bjmu.edu.cn

《北京大学学报（医学版）》
微信公众号
版权所有 © 2018 《北京大学学报（医学版）》编辑部