不同pH值对脱细胞小肠黏膜下层海绵支架螯合锶离子的影响

doi:10.19723/j.issn.1671-167X.2023.01.007

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

目的: 设计不同pH值下螯合锶(strontium, Sr)的脱细胞小肠黏膜下层(decellularized small intestinal submucosa, dSIS)海绵支架(Sr/dSIS), 以该支架的理化性能和生物相容性为评价指标, 为制备Sr/dSIS选择合适的pH值。方法: (1) Sr/dSIS制备及分组: 将dSIS溶液与氯化锶溶液等体积混合, 调节溶液pH分别为3、5、7、9, 于37℃下充分反应后经冷冻干燥制得多孔支架, 分别命名为Sr/dSIS-3、-5、-7、-9, 以dSIS支架为对照; (2)理化性能评价: 观察支架大体形貌, 采用扫描电镜分析微观形貌并测定孔隙率和孔径, 能谱分析表面元素, 红外光谱分析官能团结构, 原子吸收分光光度法测定螯合率, 比重法检测吸水率, 万能力学测试机评价压缩强度; (3)生物相容性评价: 采用Calcein-AM/PI活细胞/死细胞染色法评价各组支架的毒性和促骨髓间充质干细胞(bone mesenchymal stem cells, BMSCs)增殖效果。结果: 扫描电镜下各组支架具有三维多孔网络结构, 孔径和孔隙率差异无统计学意义; 能谱分析中Sr/dSIS-5、-7、-9组检测出锶元素的特征峰, 且锶元素均匀分布于支架; 官能团分析验证了Sr/dSIS-5、-7、-9组有螯合物形成; 螯合率分析显示Sr/dSIS-7组锶离子螯合率最高, 与其他组的差异有统计学意义(P < 0.05);各组支架吸水性良好; Sr/dSIS-5、-7、-9组的压缩强度显著高于对照组(P < 0.05);各组支架的生物相容性良好, Sr/dSIS-7组展现出最佳的促细胞增殖能力。结论: pH为7时, Sr/dSIS支架具有高锶离子螯合率以及更好的促BMSCs增殖效果, 是制备Sr/dSIS支架的理想pH值。

关键词: 脱细胞小肠黏膜下层, 锶, 骨, 组织工程, 支架

Abstract:

Objective: To investigate the preparation of decellularized small intestinal submucosa (dSIS) sponge scaffolds with chelated strontium (Sr) ions at different pH values, and to select the appropriate pH values for synthesizing Sr/dSIS scaffolds using the physicochemical properties and biocompatibility of the scaffolds as evaluation indexes. Methods: (1) Sr/dSIS scaffolds preparation and grouping: After mixing dSIS solution and strontium chloride solution in equal volumes, adjusting pH of the solution to 3, 5, 7, and 9 respectively, porous scaffolds were prepared by freeze-drying method after full reaction at 37℃, which were named Sr/dSIS-3, -5, -7, and -9 respectively, and the dSIS scaffolds were used as the control group. (2) Physicochemical property evaluation: The bulk morphology of the scaffolds was observed in each group, the microscopic morphology analyzed by scanning electron microscopy, and the porosity and pore size determined, the surface elements analyzed by energy spectroscopy, the structure of functional groups analyzed by infrared spectroscopy, the chelation rate determined by atomic spectrophotometry, the water absorption rate detected by using specific gravity method, and the compression strength evaluated by universal mechanical testing machine.(3) Biocompatibility evaluation: The cytotoxicity and proliferative effect to bone mesenchymal stem cells (BMSCs) of each group were evaluated by Calcein-AM/PI double staining method. Results: Scanning electron microscopy showed that the scaffolds of each group had an interconnected three-dimensional porous structure with no statistical difference in pore size and porosity. Energy spectrum analysis showed that strontium could be detected in Sr/dSIS-5, -7 and -9 groups, and strontium was uniformly distributed in the scaffolds. Functional group analysis further supported the formation of chelates in the Sr/dSIS-5, -7 and -9 groups. Chelation rate analysis showed that the Sr/dSIS-7 group had the highest strontium chelation rate, which was statistically different from the other groups (P < 0.05). The scaffolds in all the groups had good water absorption. The scaffolds in Sr/dSIS-5, -7 and -9 groups showed significantly improved mechanical properties compared with the control group (P < 0.05). The scaffolds in all the groups had good biocompatibility, and the Sr/dSIS-7 group showed the best proliferation of BMSCs. Conclusion: When pH was 7, the Sr/dSIS scaffolds showed the highest strontium chelation rate and the best proliferation effect of BMSCs, which was the ideal pH value for the preparation of the Sr/dSIS scaffolds.

Key words: Decellularized small intestinal submucosa, Strontium, Bone, Tissue engineering, Scaffolds

中图分类号:

R318.08

李雨柯,王梅,唐琳,刘玉华,陈晓颖. 不同pH值对脱细胞小肠黏膜下层海绵支架螯合锶离子的影响[J]. 北京大学学报（医学版）, 2023, 55(1): 44-51.

Yu-ke LI,Mei WANG,Lin TANG,Yu-hua LIU,Xiao-ying CHEN. Effect of pH on the chelation between strontium ions and decellularized small intestinal submucosal sponge scaffolds[J]. Journal of Peking University (Health Sciences), 2023, 55(1): 44-51.

图/表 10

图1

图2

图3

图4

图5

图6

图7

图8

图9

图10

参考文献 21

1	Andrée B , Bär A , Haverich A , et al. Small intestinal submucosa segments as matrix for tissue engineering: review[J]. Tissue Eng Part B Rev, 2013, 19 (4): 279- 291. doi: 10.1089/ten.teb.2012.0583
2	Tian Q , Fan Y , Hao L , et al. A comprehensive review of calcium and ferrous ions chelating peptides: Preparation, structure and transport pathways[J]. Crit Rev Food Sci Nutr, 2021, 61 (11): 1- 13.
3	O'Neill E , Awale G , Daneshmandi L , et al. The roles of ions on bone regeneration[J]. Drug Discov Today, 2018, 23 (4): 879- 890. doi: 10.1016/j.drudis.2018.01.049
4	Wu W , He L , Liang Y , et al. Preparation process optimization of pig bone collagen peptide-calcium chelate using response surface methodology and its structural characterization and stability analysis[J]. Food Chem, 2019, 284 (30): 80- 89.
5	蔡冰娜, 陈忻, 潘剑宇, 等. 响应面法优化鳕鱼皮胶原蛋白肽螯合铁工艺[J]. 食品科学, 2012, 33 (2): 48- 52. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1671-1513.2012.02.010
6	Bi J , Wang X , Zhou Y , et al. Preparation and characterization for peptide-chelated calcium of deer bone[J]. Food Sci Technol Res, 2018, 24 (4): 717- 728. doi: 10.3136/fstr.24.717
7	韩克光, 甄守艳, 范华, 等. 钙螯合羊骨胶原多肽的制备及表征分析[J]. 农业工程学报, 2015, 31 (21): 301- 307. doi: 10.11975/j.issn.1002-6819.2015.21.040
8	Zhang H , Zhao L , Shen Q , et al. Preparation of cattle bone collagen peptides-calcium chelate and its structural characterization and stability[J]. LWT-Food Sci Technol, 2021, 144 (12): 111264.
9	陆剑锋, 孟昌伟, 李进, 等. 斑点叉尾鱼骨胶原多肽螯合钙的制备及其特征[J]. 水产学报, 2012, 36 (2): 314- 320.
10	Crapo PM , Gilbert TW , Badylak SF . An overview of tissue and whole organ decellularization processes[J]. Biomaterials, 2011, 32 (12): 3233- 3243. doi: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2011.01.057
11	Li B , Wang M , Liu Y , et al. Independent effects of structural optimization and resveratrol functionalization on extracellular matrix scaffolds for bone regeneration[J]. Colloids Surf B Biointerfaces, 2022, 212, 112370. doi: 10.1016/j.colsurfb.2022.112370
12	Reing JE , Brown BN , Daly KA , et al. The effects of processing methods upon mechanical and biologic properties of porcine dermal extracellular matrix scaffolds[J]. Biomaterials, 2010, 31 (33): 8626- 8633. doi: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2010.07.083
13	Ji Y , Zhou J , Sun T , et al. Diverse preparation methods for small intestinal submucosa (SIS): Decellularization, components, and structure[J]. J Biomed Mater Res A, 2019, 107 (3): 689- 697.
14	Cowles EA , Brailey LL , Gronowicz GA . Integrin-mediated signaling regulates AP-1 transcription factors and proliferation in osteoblasts[J]. J Biomed Mater Res, 2000, 52 (4): 725- 737. doi: 10.1002/1097-4636(20001215)52:4<725::AID-JBM18>3.0.CO;2-O
15	Yi S , Ding F , Gong L , et al. Extracellular matrix scaffolds for tissue engineering and regenerative medicine[J]. Curr Stem Cell Res Ther, 2017, 12 (3): 233- 246. doi: 10.2174/1574888X11666160905092513
16	Liao J , Xu B , Zhang R , et al. Applications of decellularized materials in tissue engineering: Advantages, drawbacks and current improvements, and future perspectives[J]. J Mater Chem B, 2020, 8 (44): 10023- 10049.
17	Gorschewsky O , Puetz A , Riechert K , et al. Quantitative analysis of biochemical characteristics of bone-patellar tendon-bone allografts[J]. Biomed Mater Eng, 2005, 15 (6): 403- 411.
18	Bharadwaz A , Jayasuriya AC . Recent trends in the application of widely used natural and synthetic polymer nanocomposites in bone tissue regeneration[J]. Mater Sci Eng C Mater Biol Appl, 2020, 110, 110698.
19	Chandika P , Ko SC , Oh GW , et al. Fish collagen/alginate/chitooligosaccharides integrated scaffold for skin tissue regeneration application[J]. Int J Biol Macromol, 2015, 81 (8): 504- 513.
20	Castilla Bolaños MA , Buttigieg J , Briceño Triana JC . Development and characterization of a novel porous small intestine submucosa-hydroxyapatite scaffold for bone regeneration[J]. Mater Sci Eng C Mater Biol Appl, 2017, 72, 519- 525.
21	Liu J , Zeng H , Xiao P , et al. Sustained release of magnesium ions mediated by a dynamic mechanical hydrogel to enhance BMSC proliferation and differentiation[J]. ACS Omega, 2020, 5 (38): 24477- 24486.

相关文章 15

[1]	李峥, 吕珑薇, 张晓, 夏丹丹, 张萍, 刘云松, 周永胜. 基于干细胞和生物材料调控的口腔颅颌面骨再生的研究进展[J]. 北京大学学报（医学版）, 2026, 58(2): 272-277.
[2]	张晗, 杨馥嘉, 杨瑞莉. 干细胞功能调控在颅颌面组织再生修复中的研究进展[J]. 北京大学学报（医学版）, 2026, 58(2): 285-289.
[3]	宋晓欢, 罗桂英, 王婕妤, 贾月迪, 江飞, 朱梦黎, 王丹妮. 辅助生殖人群体脂率和体骨骼肌率与抑郁的相关性研究[J]. 北京大学学报（医学版）, 2026, 58(2): 319-326.
[4]	刘嘉昱, 祝宁, 张育祯, 高贤明, 张宇. 动态导航辅助环钻取骨的准确性[J]. 北京大学学报（医学版）, 2026, 58(2): 365-371.
[5]	王昕莹, 程雪原, 张孟钧, 李菲, 段晋瑜, 乔静. 浓缩生长因子联合引导性组织再生术治疗下颌磨牙根分叉病变的疗效[J]. 北京大学学报（医学版）, 2026, 58(2): 372-379.
[6]	曾立婷, 程凯远, 刘中宁, 李健, 杨静文, 姜婷. miR-488-5p促进大鼠骨髓间充质干细胞成神经、成骨分化及神经化骨再生[J]. 北京大学学报（医学版）, 2026, 58(1): 10-21.
[7]	FarinEbrahimi, 冯志强, FarazEbrahimi, 韩玮华, 于子杨, 贾宽宽, 安金刚. 上颌药物相关性颌骨坏死的不同分期手术治疗效果[J]. 北京大学学报（医学版）, 2026, 58(1): 107-114.
[8]	王月, 梁宇红. 繁茂型牙骨质-骨结构不良1例[J]. 北京大学学报（医学版）, 2026, 58(1): 220-224.
[9]	张斯巧, 刘建, 徐涛, 胡文杰, 张浩筠, 危伊萍. 异种骨与人工合成骨在磨牙拔牙同期微翻瓣牙槽嵴保存术中的临床效果比较[J]. 北京大学学报（医学版）, 2026, 58(1): 74-83.
[10]	王晓林, 郭邵逸, 陈大召, 温锡杰, 华勇, 张亮, 张秦. 全髋关节置换术治疗系统性红斑狼疮继发股骨头缺血性坏死的随访研究[J]. 北京大学学报（医学版）, 2025, 57(6): 1081-1088.
[11]	王翠萍, 陈哲, 程永静. 超微血流成像评估与膝骨关节炎临床症状的关联研究[J]. 北京大学学报（医学版）, 2025, 57(6): 1096-1100.
[12]	董琪, 何菁, 贾园, 姚海红, 张霞. 模拟复发性多软骨炎的VEXAS综合征1例[J]. 北京大学学报（医学版）, 2025, 57(6): 1180-1183.
[13]	王宇蓝, 曾浩, 张玉峰. 口腔种植中血浆基质的临床转化现状与前沿探索[J]. 北京大学学报（医学版）, 2025, 57(5): 836-840.
[14]	胡枫艺, 孟庆阳, 陈拿云, 王佳宁, 刘振龙, 马勇, 杨渝平, 龚熹, 王成, 刘平, 史尉利. 镜下内侧髌股复合体重建治疗伴高级别滑车发育不良复发性髌骨脱位的临床疗效[J]. 北京大学学报（医学版）, 2025, 57(5): 947-955.
[15]	于子杨, 郭厚佐, 蒋析, 韩玮华, 林野. 穿颧种植体上颌窦段成骨的影像学研究[J]. 北京大学学报（医学版）, 2025, 57(5): 967-974.

Metrics

Viewed

Full text

Abstract

Cited

Shared

Discussed