不同浓度的碳二亚胺乙醇溶液处理对牙本质自酸蚀粘接剂粘接强度的影响

doi:10.3969/j.issn.1671-167X.2017.06.021

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 目的：采用微剪切方法分析不同浓度碳二亚胺［1-ethyl-3-（3-dimethylaminopropyl）carbodiimide，EDC］乙醇溶液处理牙本质表面对自酸蚀粘接剂粘接强度和断裂模式的影响。方法：收集离体健康智齿80颗，随机分为5组，每组16颗。低速切割机暴露牙合面中层牙本质后使用两步法自酸蚀粘接剂（Clearfil SE Bond）进行牙本质粘接,所有试件设计为粘接半径1 mm、高3 mm的树脂柱试件。粘接时除空白组按常规步骤完成粘接外, 其余4组在Ⅰ液（底涂剂）处理后，分别采用3种浓度（0.01 mol/L、0.3 mol/L、0.5 mol/L）的EDC乙醇溶液和乙醇溶剂对牙本质表面处理1 min 后涂布Ⅱ液（粘接剂）完成粘接。将所有试件放入含0.5%（质量分数）氯胺T生理盐水浸泡24 h后进行微剪切实验，并在体式显微镜下观察试件断裂模式。结果： 0.01 mol/L、0.3 mol/L、0.5 mol/L EDC处理组、乙醇溶剂处理组的即刻微剪切粘接强度分别为（35.29±8.97） MPa、（40.24±9.68） MPa、（37.38±9.66） MPa、（37.49±7.76） MPa，高于空白组（33.81±7.98） MPa，各组差异均无统计学意义（P>0.05）；断裂模式在各组间差异也无统计学意义（P>0.05）。结论：不同浓度的EDC乙醇溶液处理对牙本质自酸蚀粘接剂的即刻粘接强度、断裂模式没有影响。

关键词: 酸蚀, 牙, 剪切强度, 牙粘接, 1-乙基-(3-二甲基氨基丙基)碳酰二亚胺

Abstract: Objective：To evaluate the bonding ability of one representative self-etch adhesive system by applying the micro-shear bond strength test method with different concentrations of carbodiimide ［1-ethyl-3-(3-dimethylaminopropyl) carbodiimide, EDC］ ethanol solution pretreatment. Methods:Extracted sound human third molars were collected from patients ranging 18 to 40 years. In the study, 80 molars were first sectioned to prepare a flat middle coronal dentin surface and then were randomly divided into 5 groups (n=16) according to without/with different surface treatments ［blank control; 80% (volume fraction) ethanol control; EDC ethanol solution of three concentrations (0.01 mol/L, 0.3 mol/L and 0.5 mol/L）］. Each specimen underwent a micro-shear bond strength test and failure mode observation. The data collected were subjected to statistical analysis using one-way ANOVA and post hoc Tukey’s test to analyze the difference of the microshear bond strength, and chi-square test/Fisher’s exact test for the failure mode frequency of the micro-shear bond strength test specimens at a significance level of P=0.05. Results: The micro-shear bond strength of the three concentration EDC treatments were (35.29±8.97) MPa (0.01 mol/L EDC treatment group), (40.24±9.68) MPa (0.3 mol/L EDC treatment group), (37.38±9.66) MPa (0.5 mol/L EDC treatment group) separately; and that of the 80% ethanol group was (37.49±7.76) MPa. All micro-shear bond strength value of the above four groups was statistically higher than that of the blank control group ［(33.81±7.98) MPa］. The immediate micro-shear bond strength and failure mode was of no statistically significant difference among all the groups. It was noticed that the immediate micro-shear bond strength of 0.3 mol/L was higher than that of all the other groups, especially higher than that of the 80% ethanol pretreatment group despite that there was no significant difference among all the groups. And the test of failure mode indicated that the cohesive failure was more common, while the frequency of adhesive failure was rare in each experimental group. Conclusion:EDC pretreatment had no adverse effect on the immediate microshear bond strengths of Clearfil SE Bond. Meanwhile, EDC treatment did not cause more adhesive failure in immediate micro-shear test, which had further denoted what was said above. However, it needs more research to illustrate the anti-enzymatic role of EDC in dentin bonding.

Key words: Acid etching, dental, Shear strength, Dental bonding, 1-ethyl-3-(3-dimethylaminopro-pyl) carbodiimide

中图分类号:

R781.05

唐琳，张一，李皓，刘玉华，周永胜，李博文，吴唯伊，王思雯. 不同浓度的碳二亚胺乙醇溶液处理对牙本质自酸蚀粘接剂粘接强度的影响[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2017, 49(6): 1055-1059.

TANG Lin, ZHANG Yi, LI Hao, LIU Yu-hua, ZHOU Yong-sheng, LI Bo-wen, WU Wei-yi, WANG Si-wen. Influence of EDC ethanol solution on dentin shear bond strength with a self-etch adhesive system[J]. Journal of Peking University(Health Sciences), 2017, 49(6): 1055-1059.

参考文献

相关文章 15

[1]	刘云松,周倜,叶红强. 前牙美学修复的整体策略及细节剖析[J]. 北京大学学报（医学版）, 2022, 54(1): 1-6.
[2]	陈震,谷宝鑫,汤玉芳,闫子玉,倪方端,崔念晖. 应用Delphi法构建下颌阻生第三磨牙拔除难度评分量表[J]. 北京大学学报（医学版）, 2022, 54(1): 100-104.
[3]	钱锟,潘洁,朱文昊,赵晓一,刘畅,雍颹. 两种硅酸钙类材料用于成熟恒牙牙髓切断术的临床效果[J]. 北京大学学报（医学版）, 2022, 54(1): 113-118.
[4]	孙菲,李思琪,危伊萍,钟金晟,王翠,胡文杰. 种植体周病非手术治疗中联合应用甘氨酸粉喷砂的临床效果评价[J]. 北京大学学报（医学版）, 2022, 54(1): 119-125.
[5]	刘思民,赵一姣,王晓燕,王祖华. 动态导航下不同深度环钻定位精确度的体外评价[J]. 北京大学学报（医学版）, 2022, 54(1): 146-152.
[6]	李怡,王丽瑜,刘晓强,周倜,吕季喆,谭建国. 不同材料及厚度椅旁CAD/CAM瓷贴面的边缘特征[J]. 北京大学学报（医学版）, 2022, 54(1): 140-145.
[7]	邱淑婷,朱玉佳,王时敏,王飞龙,叶红强,赵一姣,刘云松,王勇,周永胜. 姿势微笑位口唇对称参考平面的数字化构建及初步应用验证[J]. 北京大学学报（医学版）, 2022, 54(1): 193-199.
[8]	袁临天,马利沙,刘润园,齐伟,张栌丹,王贵燕,王宇光. 计算机模拟亚甲基蓝与牙龈卟啉单胞菌部分蛋白的分子对接[J]. 北京大学学报（医学版）, 2022, 54(1): 23-30.
[9]	朱小玲,李文静,王宪娥,宋文莉,徐莉,张立,冯向辉,路瑞芳,释栋,孟焕新. 细胞色素B-245α链及胆固醇酯转运蛋白基因多态性与广泛型侵袭性牙周炎易感性的关系[J]. 北京大学学报（医学版）, 2022, 54(1): 18-22.
[10]	徐欣然,霍芃呈,和璐,孟焕新,朱筠轩,靳东思奇. 伴与不伴糖尿病的牙周炎患者牙周基础治疗的疗效比较及其与白细胞水平的相关分析[J]. 北京大学学报（医学版）, 2022, 54(1): 48-53.
[11]	王鹃,尉华杰,孙井德,邱立新. 预成刚性连接杆用于无牙颌种植即刻印模制取的应用评价[J]. 北京大学学报（医学版）, 2022, 54(1): 187-192.
[12]	闫文娟,钟洁,林碧琛,丁美丽,陈小贤. 常温流动牙胶应用于根尖诱导成形术后根管充填[J]. 北京大学学报（医学版）, 2022, 54(1): 77-82.
[13]	马欣蓉,朱晓鸣,李静,李德利,李和平,谭建国. 新型大气压冷等离子体射流处理对牙本质胶原纤维交联化的影响[J]. 北京大学学报（医学版）, 2022, 54(1): 83-88.
[14]	杨刚,胡文杰,曹洁,柳登高. 牙周健康的上颌前牙唇侧嵴顶上牙龈的三维形态分析[J]. 北京大学学报（医学版）, 2021, 53(5): 990-994.
[15]	杨洋,浦婷婷,陈立,谭建国. 比较两种改良式印章法辅助后牙树脂牙合贴面修复的形态准确性[J]. 北京大学学报（医学版）, 2021, 53(5): 977-982.

Metrics

Viewed

Full text

Abstract

Cited

Shared

Discussed